Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 41 no. 3 (2025)

Students’ Motivation, Attitude, Self-Efficacy, and Proficiency Level in Science

Edzelle Digo | Berlita Y. Disca

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

Students’ motivation, attitude, and self-belief play a contributory role in shaping how well they understand and perform in science. This study examined the relationship between students’ attitude, motivation, and self-efficacy, and their science proficiency at a Public Secondary School in the Division of South Cotabato during the 2024–2025 academic year. A total of 206 junior high school students from Grades 7 to 10 participated in the study. A descriptivecorrelational research design was employed, utilizing a validated Likert-scale questionnaire to measure the affective variables and academic records to determine science proficiency. Descriptive statistics showed that students had a positive attitude (M = 3.77), a high level of motivation (M = 4.01), and a moderate level of self-efficacy (M = 3.45). More than half of the respondents (52.4%) were classified under the developing level of science proficiency. Spearman Rank Correlation revealed significant positive relationships among the three affective variables: attitude and motivation (r = .597, p < .01), motivation and self-efficacy (r = .531, p < .01), and attitude and self-efficacy (r = .487, p < .01). Furthermore, both motivation (r = .531, p < .01) and self-efficacy (r = .487, p < .01) showed significant correlations with students’ science proficiency. Results indicated significant differences in affective traits based on sex and grade level. These findings affirm the integral role of affective factors in science learning and underscore the need for pedagogical strategies that enhance students’ emotional engagement and confidence, particularly in public secondary school settings.



References:

  1. Adya Winata, K., Hasanah, A., & Sunan, U. (2021). Implementasi model pembelajaran interaksi sosial untuk meningkatkan karakter peserta didik. https://doi.org/10.36232/pendidikan.v9i1.639.
  2. Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. International handbook of emotions in education https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148211.
  3. Alasim, K., & Paul, P. V. (2019). Understanding factors that affect teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion of students who are hard of hearing in Saudi Arabia. Deafness and Education International, 21(4), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1489950.
  4. Aprilisya, N., Kerti Yasa, N., & Giantari, I. (2017). Peran Sikap Memediasi Pengaruh Pemasaran Hijau Terhadap Niat Beli Produk Ramah Lingkungan. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 6(4), 254624. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Manajemen/article/download/27022/18218.
  5. Aurah, C. (2017). Investigating the relationship between science self-efficacy beliefs, gender, and academic achievement among high school students in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 146–153.
  6. Ayasrah, F. T. M., Alarabi, K., Al Mansouri, M., Fattah, H. A. A., & Al-Said, K. (2024). Enhancing secondary school students’ attitudes toward physics by using computer simulations.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
  8. BERA (British Educational Research Association). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.).
  9. Bernardo, A. B. I., Estrellado, A. F., & Tuazon, J. E. (2020). Socioeconomic status and academic performance: Findings from Philippine urban public schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 345–361.
  10. Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). Correlational Research | When & How to Use. Scribbr. Retrieved May 5, 2025, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/
  11. Britner, S.L. (2002). Science Self-Efficacy of African American Middle School Students: Relationship to Motivation Self-Beliefs, Achievement, Gender, and Gender Orientation. Ph.D. Thesis, Division of Educational Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  12. Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Oades, L. G., Morrish, L., & Scoular, C. (2019). The role of achievement emotions in the collaborative problem-solving performance of adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, pp. 70, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2019.02.005.
  13. Çetin-Dindar, A. (2016). Student motivation and learning in science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(6), 1345–1360.
  14. Chai CS, Lin P-Y, King RB, & Jong MS-Y (2021). Intrinsic Motivation and Sophisticated Epistemic Beliefs Are Promising Pathways to Science Achievement: Evidence from High Achieving Regions in the East and the West. Front. Psychol. 12:581193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581193
  15. Coros, J. D., & Madrigal, D. V. (2021). Self-directed learning, self-efficacy in learning, and academic motivation of public senior high school students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 21(2), 19-34.
  16. Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 4th ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  17. Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum Guide.
  18. Department of Education (DepEd). (2021). Basic Education Report.
  19. Derfler-Rozin, R., & Pitesa, M. (2021). Motivation purity bias: Expression of extrinsic motivation undermines perceived intrinsic motivation and engenders bias in selection decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 63(6), 1840–1864. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5465/ AMJ.2017.0617
  20. Du, Y., Wang, X., Brombal, D., Moriggi, A., Sharpley, A., & Pang, S. (2018). Changes in environmental awareness and its connection to local environmental management in water conservation zones: The case of Beijing, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062087.
  21. Galla, B. M., Amemiya, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2018). Using expectancy-value theory to understand academic self-control. Learning and Instruction, 58, 22–33. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.004.
  22. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146.
  23. Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146.
  24. Godec, S., King, H., Archer, L., Dawson, E., & Seakins, A. (2018). Examining student engagement with science through a Bourdieusian notion of field. Sci. Educ. 27, 501–521. doi: 10.1007/s11191-018-9988-5
  25. Grabau, L., & Ma, X. (2017). Science engagement and science achievement in the context of science instruction: A multilevel analysis of U.S. students and schools. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 1045–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1313468
  26. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Schulz, R. (2019). Engaging Students in Science: The Potential Role of “Narrative Thinking” and “Romantic Understanding.” Volume 4 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00038
  27. Harefa, D. (2020). English Learning Model Theory in Science. Solok, West Sumatra: CV. Independent Scholar.
  28. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2017). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1262786
  29. IEA. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Science and Mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  30. İnce, M. (2023). Examining the role of motivation, attitude, and self-efficacy beliefs in shaping secondary school students’ academic achievement in science courses. Sustainability, 15(15), 11612.
  31. Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. S. (2018). Warning! Increases in interest without enjoyment may not be trend predictive of genuine interest in learning science. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.03.005
  32. Jamil, H., & Mahmud, R. (2019). Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Students’ Academic Achievement. Creative Education, 10(13), 2947–2960. https://www.scirp.org/pdf/ce_2019112614300546.pdf
  33. Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students’ Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy in the Sciences: Differential Relations to Antecedents and Educational Outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13‒24. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002
  34. Juan, A.; Hannan, S.; Namome, C. (2018). I believe I can do science: Self-efficacy and science achievement of Grade 9 students in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci.,114, 48–54.
  35. Jumadi, J., Diani, R., & Bakar, M. (2023). Students’ Self-Efficacy in Science Learning Based on Gender. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371906024_Students%27_Self-Efficacy_in_Science_Learning_based_on_Gender
  36. Kahyao˘glu, M.; Pesen, A. (2013). Üstün Yetenekli Ö˘grencilerin Fen ve Teknolojiye Yönelik Tutumları, Ö˘grenme ve Motivasyon Stilleri Arasındaki ˙ Ili¸ski. Türk Üstün ZekâE ˘gitim Derg.,3, 38–49
  37. Karasar, N. (2017). Bilimsel Ara¸stırma Yöntemi: Kavramlar ˙Ilkeler Teknikler; Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık: Ankara, Türkiye.
  38. Kaya, H.; Böyük, U. (2011) ˙Ilkö˘gretim II. kademe ö˘grencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersine ve fen deneylerine kar¸sı tutumları. Türk Bilim Ara¸stırma Vakfı Bilim Derg.,4, 120–130.
  39. Kesan, C., & Kaya, D. (2018). Mathematics and science self-efficacy resources as the predictor of academic success. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 45-58.
  40. Keser, T. (2015). Conditions Supporting the Development of Scientific Argumentation in High School Chemistry Classrooms: The Role of Question Prompts and an Interactive Simulation. https://doi.org/10.7275/6955327.0
  41. Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (2016). Science Education in East Asia: Pedagogical Innovations and Research-Informed Practices. Springer.
  42. Krishan, I. Q., & Al-rsa’i, M. S. (2023). The Effect of Technology-Oriented Differentiated Instruction on Motivation to learn Science. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1).
  43. Kwon, H., Vela, K., Williams, A. M., & Barroso, L. R. (2023). Mathematics and science self-efficacy and STEM careers: A path analysis. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 74-89.
  44. Lehman, A. (2005). Jump for Basic Univariate and Multivariate Statistics: A Step-by-Step Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-1-59047-576-8.
  45. Lerner, M. (2024). What is Your Level of Proficiency? The 6 Different Levels of Proficiency to Reach Conversational Fluency. Copyright © 2024 Sololingual, All Rights Reserved. https://www.sololingual.com/blog/level-of-proficiency
  46. Lilian, K.Y. (2012). A Study of the Attitude, Self-efficacy, Effort and Academic Achievement of CityU Students towards Research Methods and Statistics. Discov.–SS Stud. E-J.,1, 154–183.
  47. Luki, N., & Kustijono, R. (2017). Pengembangan Laboratorium Virtual Berbasis Algodoo Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Gerak Parabola. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 06(03), 27–35. fisika/article/view/19846/18158.
  48. McClenaghan, E. (2022). Mann-Whitney U Test: Assumptions and Example. https://www.technologynetworks.com/informatics/articles/mann-whitney-u-test-assumptions-and-example-363425
  49. Narut, Y. F., & Nardi, M. (2019). Analisis Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Pada Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar di Kota Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i3.p259-266.
  50. Noori, A. (2024). Originality in Question: Plagiarism and Afghan English Major Students. https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v1i1.26
  51. OECD (2016). OECD Proposes Global Competence Assessment. International Educator, 25(4), 14.
  52. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing.
  53. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  54. Paños, E., Navarro, R. I., & Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R. (2020). Attitude and perception towards science. Comparing active vs traditional instruction in transition to adulthood students. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1703552.
  55. Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). (2021). Philippine Education Indicators. https://psa.gov.ph/
  56. Putri, Y. L., & Rifai, A. (2019). Pengaruh Sikap dan Minat Belajar terhadap Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik Paket C. Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment, 3(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.15294/pls.v2i1.23448.
  57. Rappler (2023). PH still among lowest in math, science, reading in global student assessment. https://www.rappler.com/nation/for-second-time-ph-ranks-among-lowest-pisa-2022/
  58. Rohmah. (2017). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap Perilaku Resistensi pada siswa-Siswi SMP Islam Al Hidayah Jember. Doctoral Dissertation, http://repository.unmuhjember.ac.id/8639/. Universitas Muhammadiyah
  59. Rustamovna, R. B., & Obloberdiyevna, D. S. (2023). Motivation as a Determining Factor in Promoting Student Independence. Best Journal of Innovation in Science, Research and Development, 2(2), 140-144.
  60. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA; p. 756.
  61. Surur, M. (2020). “Effect of Education Operational Cost On The Education Quality With The School Productivity As Moderating Variable, “Psychol. educ. J., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1196–1205.
  62. Uyanık, G. (2017). ˙Ilkokul Ö˘grencilerinin Fen Bilimleri Dersine Yönelik Tutumları ile Akademik Ba¸sarıları Arasındaki ˙Ili¸ski. TÜBAV Bilim Derg.,10, 86–93
  63. Webb-Williams, J. (2018). Science self-efficacy in the primary classroom: Using mixed methods to investigate sources of self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 939–961.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic