Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 38 no. 2 (2025)

Drivers of Laboratory Instruction in Science Education

Lovely Dyserie Yoldan | Christian Cuizon | Chester Biñas | Apple Nemeño | Joseph Blair Deloria | Flordelis j. Ejercito | John Mark N. Saldivar

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Laboratory instruction is crucial for promoting experiential learning, analytical reasoning, and scientific investigation, which are fundamental for academic achievement in fields such as General Chemistry. Anchored on SDG 5 (Quality Education) and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), this study sought to determine the principal determinants affecting laboratory instruction in one of the private higher education institutions in Misamis Occidental, specifically investigating the correlation among institutional, educator, and student-related variables and the academic achievement of first-year Criminology students. The study utilized a descriptive-correlational research approach, including researcher-developed questionnaires and regression analysis for data collection and analysis. The results indicated that school-related factors, including laboratory facilities, material availability, and technician support, as well as teacher-related factors such as content understanding and pedagogical competency, did not substantially correlate with students' academic achievement. In contrast, among the elements related to students, motivation had a weak yet substantial positive correlation with academic performance. Although there are no significant predictors for the quality of laboratory instruction, the study emphasizes the necessity for ongoing enhancement of laboratory supplies, teacher professional development, and techniques to engage students. Academic institutions are advised to invest in programs that foster student enthusiasm and curiosity, thus advancing the overarching objectives of equitable, quality, and creative education.



References:

  1. Akanbi, A. O., & Omosewo, E. O. (2018). Teachers characteristics and availability of laboratories as predictors of senior school students’ performance in physics in Ilorin, Nigeria https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207305.pdf
  2. Alampay, L. P., & Garcia, A. S. (2019). Education and parenting in the Philippines. https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/97/
  3. Bailey, C. A., White, A. J., & Pain, R. H. (2010). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis, (2nd ed.). Routledge.\
  4. Caballes, M. E. J., Pedrita, N. J. C., Villaren, J. M., & Diquito, T. J. A. (2023). Status of science laboratories in secondary basic education public schools in the division of Davao del Sur, Philippines. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v3i1.2495
  5. Cambridge Dictionary. (2024). Motivation. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/motivation
  6. Cambridge Dictionary. (2024). Profile. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/profile
  7. Cano, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663755
  8. Chislett, V., & Chapman, A. (2005). VAK learning styles self-assessment questionnaire. https://www.businessballs.com/freetestsquizzes/vaklearningstyles
  9. Collins       English            Dictionary. (2024). Laboratory materials.
  10. De Borja, M. J., & Marasigan, R. L. (2020). The heart of science: Laboratory instruction and its role in education. Philippine Science Journal, 12(2), 56-67.
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  12. Dela Cruz, M. (2020). The impact of visual aids on understanding complex concepts in Filipino classrooms. Philippine Journal of Education, 43(1), 78-91.
  13. Dohn, N. B., Dohn, N. A., & Madsen, L. M. (2016). Students’ engagement in learning: perceptions and practices in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1373-1390.
  14. Dohn, N. B., Fago, A., Overgaard, J., Madsen, P. T., & Malte, H. (2016). Students’ motivation toward laboratory work in physiology teaching. Journal of Experimental Physiology Education
  15. Hamedu, M. Y., Ibrahim, A. I., & Mohammed, A. (2014). The use of laboratory method in teaching secondary school students: A key to improving the quality of education. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(9), 81. https://www.ijser.org
  16. Hammond, L. D., & Grossman, P. (2019). Preparing teachers for a changing world.https://www.highered.nysed.gov/pdf/lindadarlinghammond.pdf
  17. Hammond, L. D. (2000). Education policy analysis archives. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED449163.pdf
  18. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. W. H. Freeman.
  19. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta- analysis relating to achievement https://inspirasifoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/John- Hattie-Visible-Learning_-A-synthesis-of-over-800-meta-analyses-relating-to- achievement-2008.pdf
  20. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  21. Hermitt, D. A. (1996). The role and management of school laboratory technicians. Division of Education, University of Sheffield. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=qE1PSX0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=qE1PSX0AAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC
  22. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schiling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-09378-004
  23. Hill, H. C., & Chin, M. (2018). Connections between teachers’ knowledge of students, instruction, and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1076–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218769614
  24. Hofstein, A., & Naaman, R. M. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105-107.
  25. Holvio, A. (2022). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives,8(1). https://epaa.asu.edu/article/view/392/515
  26. Huda, N., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). Student motivation in the context of learning chemistry: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Education Research and Practice, 25(3), 389-401.
  27. Isa, N. S. M., Omar, N., Fatzela, F. H. M., Ghazali, Z. M., & Anas, N. (2021). The relationship between students’ learning styles and academic performance: Final year accounting students. EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 1–9.
  28. Khan Niazi, S., Khan, R., & Yasmeen, S. (2018). The importance of laboratory instructions in science education: A case study of Chemistry. Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 24-35
  29. Magulod, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits, and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198.
  30. Meydan, H. (2021). Measuring student motivation: Development and validation of a questionnaire. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(2), 145-163.
  31. Mohammadpour, E. (2013). Investigating the effect of school factors on students’ academic achievement in Iran: A multilevel analysis. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(21), 2189-2200.
  32. Okebukola E. U.   (1997). Science           Teachers Handbook. Inyman. https://globalacademicgroup.com/journals/teacher%20perspective/AVAILABILITY%20OF%20SCIENTIFIC%20EQUIPMENTS%20IN%20THE.pdf
  33. Okeke, P. N. (1995). The adequacy of laboratory facilities and academic performance in basic sciences. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1209309.pdf
  34. Olaniyan, O. (2017). The importance of laboratory materials in secondary school science education: A review. Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 47-55.
  35. Olubu, J. (2016). The impact of laboratory resources on students’ performance in science subjects: A case study of Nigerian secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 801-812.
  36. Pareek, A. (2019). The importance of laboratory instruction in science education: Challenges in India. Indian Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 154-161.
  37. Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges, and Universities (PAASCU). (2018). School evaluation criteria. PAASCU Publications.
  38. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  39. Rossette, C. A., Teixeira, R. A., & Lopes, F. C. (2021). Laboratory Technicians’ Use and Interpretation of
  40. Hazard Communication Elements on Chemical Labels. ACS Publications Division. (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.chas.0c00125)
  41. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
  42. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Teachers’ integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments. NARST. https://narst.org/research-matters/pedagogical-content-knowledge
  43. Simpson, E. S. (1966). The classification of educational objectives, psychomotor domain. Illinois Journal of Education, 7(3), 75-85.
  44. Strauss, A., Corbin, J., & Fagerhaugh, S. (2001). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  45. Turner, S., Keegan, K., & Davidson, C. (2009). Pedagogical strategies to engage students in laboratory-based learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(1), 54-59.
  46. University of Mexico. (2017). Role of laboratory technicians in educational institutions. University of Mexico Press.
  47. Wekwe, E., Etuk, N., & Udo, U. (2024). Factors affecting science education in Nigerian secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 89-102.
  48. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
  49. Wiltronics. (2022). Lab     consumables   and      their     uses:    A       handy      guide. https://www.wiltronics.com.au/wiltronics-knowledge-base/laboratory- consumables-hardware-and-equipment/
  50. Yara P. O. (2010). Adequacy of Resource Materials and Mathematics Achievement of Senior Secondary Schools in Southwestern. Nigeria Journal of Social Sciences. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdb25be44338868b8111a50fe29a490a916f2bcc 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic