Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 38 no. 3 (2025)

Enhancing Science 10 Learning Through Photo Elicitation-Based Interactive Activities on Biodiversity

Arlyn Camandero | Christine P. Abo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Understanding biodiversity goes beyond memorizing facts; it also requires seeing, experiencing, and making connections to the world around us. However, traditional teaching methods often fail to capture students’ interest and deepen their appreciation for biodiversity. Hence, this qualitative study employing an action research approach explored how photo-elicitation-based interactive activities can enhance Science 10 students’ learning experiences at San Jose National High School- Lapuz National High School Annex. By using real-life images of biodiversity, the study aimed to make learning more engaging and meaningful. The study was conducted among 48 students who participated in classroom observations, student reflection journals, and focused group discussions. Thematic analysis was applied to identify patterns in students’ understanding, experiences, and challenges. Findings revealed that photo-elicitation helped students develop a deeper understanding of biodiversity concepts, making learning more relatable and interactive. The visual approach made learning more engaging, sparking curiosity and encouraging active discussions. Many students found the approach enjoyable and thought-provoking, though some initially struggled with interpreting images. Over time, guided discussions helped them improve their analytical thinking and environmental awareness. More importantly, the study revealed a positive shift in students’ attitudes toward biodiversity conservation. Thus, it reinforced that photo-elicitation is a powerful tool for making biodiversity education more engaging and thought-provoking. It goes beyond memorization, allowing students to see biodiversity as something real and relevant.



References:

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change In undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
  2. Bagnara, S. & Ranchetti, A. (2020). Enhancing Learning through Photo-elicitation: A Study in the Context of Biology Education. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2).
  3. Baker, J., Thomas, S., & Larkin, K. (2020). Enhancing student engagement through visual inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Education,34 (3). 215-229.
  4. Barraquio. W., Barroga, C., & Abulencia, A. (2019). Teaching environmental science through contextual learning activities. Journal of Environmental Education Research,25(2)112-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1602336
  5. Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3). 265-278.
  6. Bell, R. L, Smetana, L, & Binns, I. (2018). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing inquiry-based science learning. NSTA Press.
  7. Bohnsack, R. (2020). Teaching environment values through biodiversity education. Ecological Education Quarterly, 9(1), 56-70.
  8. Bourke, B. (2019). Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2098-2116.
  9. Bowers, J., Powers, L., & Wilson, T. (2018). Virtual biodiversity: Bridging access gaps in ecological education. Journal of Digital Learning,12(2), 101-115.
  10. Braun., V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa      (Repository)
  11. Brusia, K. (2020). Constructivist approaches in education: Principles and practices. Routledge.
  12. Buchanan, K., Lee, H., & Renner, M. (2020). The impact of visual media on species recognition and conservation concern. Conservation Psychology,15(1),12-22.
  13. Carspecken P. F. (19196). Critical ethnography in educational research. Routledge.
  14. Cayuela Ferrero, L. (2023). Photo -elicitation in virtual environments as a tool for teachers in service-training. In A. Baustista Garcia-Vera (Ed.,)., Photographic elicitation and   development (pp.95-108). Springe. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20164_8 (Springer Link).
  15. Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. University of New Mexico Press.
  16. Cox, D., & Degnan, J. (2016). Images as inquiry tools in environmental science classrooms. Environmental Education Review, 11(1), 33-47.
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  18. David, R. G., Dela Cruz, M.A., & Mendoza, P. R. (2021). Integrating photo-elicitation in secondary science classes: Engaging students in biodiversity conservation. Philippine Journal of Science Education ,12(1), 23-38. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. * Science *., 345(6195), 401-406.
  19. Delos Reyes, A. C., Santos, J.M., & Ramos, T. C. (2022). Environmental awareness and student engagement through localized visual instruction. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 10(4),45-59’
  20. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). (2022). * State of the Philippine environment report*. https://www.denr.gov.ph
  21. DeWalt, K. M. (2015). Connecting students with biodiversity through photo narratives. Environmental Education Journal, 19(4), 244-258.
  22. Dirzo., R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N.J., & Collen, B. (2014).
  23. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Constructivism and science teaching. Science Education, 62 (1), 93-106.
  24. Fischer, M., Huttner, J., & Alvarez, B. (2022). Interactive visual learning and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 205-219.
  25. IPBES. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Intergovernmental Science -Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://ipbes.net
  26. Flick, L. B. (2018). Teaching science through inquiry-based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 118(4), 179-190.
  27. Flicker, S., & Guta, A. (2008). The role of photo-elicitation in community-based research. Journal of Community Health, 33(2), 120-128.
  28. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  29. Garcia, M. P., Cruz, C. A., & Andres, R.P. (2022). Visual methods in education: The promise of photo-elicitation in biodiversity instruction. Journal of Science Learning,7(2),91-104.
  30. Gibson, M., Robinson, R., & Tindle., R. (2021), Visual learning strategies in science. International Journal of Educational Psychology,10(2), 158-172.
  31. Gonzalez, C., & Fuchs, L. (2016), Engaging learners in scientific inquiry through visual methods. Teaching Science, 62(1), 45-52.
  32. Gubrium, J. F., & Harper, K. D. (2016). Participatory Visual and Digital Methods Routledge.
  33. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13-   26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
  34. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13-26.
  35. Harper, T., & Smith, L. (2020). Emotional Learning in environmental science classrooms. Journal of Learning and Teaching, 26(1), 98-114.
  36. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  37. Hawkes, J. (2018). Systems thinking in biodiversity education. Biology Education Review,12(2). 155-172.
  38. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?   of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 235-245.
  39. Hsu, P., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Understanding students’ conceptual knowledge in biodiversity: A focus on student learning and engagement. Science Education International, 29(4), 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817.
  40. Huang, Y., Chen, J., & Wang, S. (2018). The significance of biodiversity education: A review of research in the field of science education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 765-785.
  41. International Journal of Science Pedagogy, 27(2),78-95.
  42. Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2009). Nature and the human spirit. In R. B. Bechtel & P. J. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1139-1153). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic