The Design of an Enhanced Supplier Evaluation System for the Rubber Chemicals Industry

Ke  Chen,; Reynaldo  Dusaran,

The Design of an Enhanced Supplier Evaluation System for the Rubber Chemicals Industry

Abstract:

This study presents the design and qualitative evaluation of an enhanced supplier evaluation system tailored to the rubber chemicals industry. In response to the limitations of traditional models that often overemphasize cost and delivery metrics, the study adopts the ADDIE instructional design framework to develop a context-specific, multidimensional assessment tool. Drawing from qualitative data collected through focus group discussions and expert interviews across 35 rubber chemical firms in China, the research identifies key evaluation dimensions including product quality standards, quality control systems, cost transparency, logistics performance, and on-time delivery. The findings emphasize the increasing importance of supplier responsiveness, environmental accountability, and strategic alignment in supplier selection processes. Thematic analysis reveals a strong preference for transparent pricing structures, collaborative quality management, and digital procurement integration. Compared to previous models, the proposed system offers a more holistic and adaptive approach to supplier evaluation, aligned with industry-specific operational demands and sustainability objectives. The study contributes a practical framework for supplier assessment that supports improved decision-making, long-term collaboration, and enhanced supply chain performance.

References:

BIN, H., & WANG, Y. (2014). Supplier evaluation and selection based on improved TOPSIS method in green supply chain. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 28(2), 81–86.
Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. International journal of management reviews, 14(3), 305-327.
Hatzius, J., Hooper, P., Mishkin, F. S., Schoenholtz, K. L., & Watson, M. W. (2010). Financial conditions indexes: A fresh look after the financial crisis (No. w16150). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lichtenstein, S., & Dade, M. (2020). Trust and transparency in procurement relationships: A supplier’s perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(4), 58–76.
Luo, X., & Peng, S. (2011). Research on supplier evaluation and selection based on AHP and TOPSIS in green supply chain. Soft Science, 25(2), 53–56.
Maravilla Jr, V. S., & Flores, G. (2025). Entrepreneurial competency, resilience, and financial literacy: Drivers of sustainable performance in SMEs for societal welfare. Journal of Sustainability, Society, and Eco-Welfare, 2(2), 159-176.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2002). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1228–1263.
Omurca, S. I. (2018). An intelligent supplier evaluation, selection and development system. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1), 690–697.
Wang, H., & Xing, Z. (2008). Research on supplier evaluation index system based on supply chain management. Modern Business, (3), 8.
Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2–18.
Wen, D., & Feng, Y. (2004). Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of supplier selection. World Standardization and Quality Management, (1), 17–19.
Wiśniewska, P., Movahedifar, E., Formela, K., Naser, M. Z., Vahabi, H., & Saeb, M. R. (2024). The chemistry, properties and performance of flame-retardant rubber composites: Collecting, analyzing, categorizing, machine learning modeling, and visualizing. Composites Science and Technology, 110517.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.