HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 38 no. 4 (2025)

Risk Perception and Strategic Responses: Exploring the Relationship Between Institutional Characteristics and Business Performance in Private Higher Education Institutions

Xiaozhen Fang | Carmen Hernandez

Discipline: others in business and management

 

Abstract:

This study explores the interrelationship between institutional characteristics, risk perception, and business performance in private higher education institutions (PHEIs) in China. Against the backdrop of rapid sectoral expansion and increasing regulatory complexity, the research investigates how managerial perceptions of financial and non-financial risks are shaped by institutional type, size, accreditation status, and years of operation, and how these perceptions influence performance across financial, customer, internal process, and learning-growth dimensions. A survey-correlational design was employed, with data collected from 205 administrators representing 30 PHEIs. Statistical analyses revealed that institutional characteristics significantly affect both risk perception and business performance, with operational and human resource risks showing the strongest negative associations. Moreover, risk perception was found to mediate the relationship between institutional profiles and performance outcomes. The findings underscore the need for risk-informed strategic planning and offer a comprehensive framework for enhancing institutional resilience in China's evolving higher education sector.



References:

  1. Al-Filali, I. Y., Abdulaal, R. M., Alawi, S. M., & Makki, A. A. (2023). Modification of strategic planning tools for planning financial sustainability in higher education institutions. Journal of Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.14239
  2. Bai, L. (2022). Construction of a university financial performance evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process: A case study of S University. Research on Education Finance and Accounting, (03), 34–42. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JYCK.0.2022-03-006
  3. Chen, Y., & Fan, L. (2021). Financial risk early warning model of private colleges and universities based on logistic regression. Journal of Accounting and Economics Research, 9(4), 78–82.
  4. Chen, Y., & Yuan, T. (2022). Research on financial performance evaluation of higher education institutions based on DEA. Financial Management Studies, (12), 19–22.
  5. Dai, Q. (2023). An analysis of the application of the balanced scorecard in university financial performance management. Finance and Accounting Learning, (31), 26–28. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:CKXX.0.2023-31-009
  6. Fan, F. (2023). Research on the development strategy of university financial performance management in the new development stage. Modern Business Research, (04), 86–88. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:BDSP.0.2023-04-028
  7. Galindo-Illanes, M. K., Gallegos-Mardones, J. A., & Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z. (2021). Explaining loyalty in higher education: A model and comparative analysis from the policy of gratuity, a case applied to Chile. Sustainability, 13(19), 10781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910781
  8. Guo, S. (2022). Analysis of higher education resource allocation and financial economic efficiency in universities (Doctoral dissertation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFDLAST2023&filename=1022560078.nh
  9. Huang, F. (2020). The development and challenges of private higher education in China. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2019-0141
  10. Jamali, D., Dirani, A., & Harwood, I. A. (2022). The impact of leadership on organizational performance: Evidence from higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2020-0370
  11. Jayabalan, V., Bano, S., & Abdullah, A. (2021). Strategic management practices and university performance: A case study of Malaysian HEIs. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 53(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2020.1793837
  12. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
  13. Musico, S. E., Galagar, M. S., Villarin, M. D., Nunez, G. B., Aguilar, J. D., & Maravilla Jr, V. S. (2022). Transformational Leadership, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Crisis Management Practices among Selected Hotels in Iloilo, Philippines. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 4(3), 333-344.
  14. Li, W., & Zhang, H. (2022). Institutional governance, structure, and performance in Chinese private universities. Higher Education Policy, 35(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00256-0
  15. Lu, Q. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of university financial performance under the background of “Double First-Class” construction (Master’s thesis, Changzhou University). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202301&filename=1022699289
  16. Nguyen, H. T., Dao, T. L., & Truong, Q. T. (2022). Risk management in Vietnamese universities: A review of perceptions and practices. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.17893
  17. Ostojić, S., & Leko Šimić, M. (2021). Risk perception in higher education: An institutional perspective. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 26(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.26.1.3
  18. Sun, X. (2021). Mediating role of risk perception in the relationship between organizational characteristics and institutional performance. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(3), 45–52.