Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 38 no. 5 (2025)

Exploring Marine Resources: A Photo-Elicitation Approach by Science 10 Students

Friezenith Calamay | Christine P. Abo

Discipline: agricultural sciences

 

Abstract:

The rapid degradation of marine ecosystems is a global environmental crisis. Climate change, overfishing, pollution, and habitat destruction have led to declining fish populations, coral bleaching, and the loss of biodiversity. According to the United Nations, over 3 billion people rely on marine and coastal biodiversity for their livelihoods, yet many of these ecosystems are under threat due to unsustainable human activities. In the Philippines—an archipelagic country rich in marine biodiversity—coastal communities like Kalamansig face significant challenges in protecting their marine resources. This situation reflects a global issue: the disconnect between environmental awareness and meaningful action. I was motivated to conduct this study to understand how young people, particularly students, perceive their role in marine conservation within their local setting. Using photo-elicitation as a participatory tool, this research aimed to empower Grade 10 students from Kalamansig National High School to document marine resources and reflect on their significance. By capturing and discussing their own images, students developed insights into both the ecological and economic value of marine life. This approach aligns with the global call for environmental education and community-based action, especially among youth, to address the growing threats facing our oceans and coastal ecosystems.



References:

  1. Allen, S. (2019). Visual narratives in environmental education: The value of photo-elicitation methods. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 25(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1588903
  2. Altintzoglou, T., & Heide, M. (2016). Fish quality and consumers: How do consumers’ knowledge, attitudes and expectations influence buying behavior? Food Control, 60, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.043
  3. Altintzoglou, T., Honkanen, P., & Heide, M. (2016). Food quality and safety perception in the Norwegian seafood industry: A case study. Food Control, 59, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.030
  4. Anderson, M., Chen, J., & Cooper, A. (2019). Learning in the deep blue: Experiential marine education for secondary school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1600480
  5. Andrews, S., Stocker, L., & Oechel, W. (2018). Underwater photo-elicitation: A new experiential marine education technique. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 1–15. ERIC+3ResearchGate+3Science.gov+3
  6. Anticamara, J. A., Agduma, A. R., & Campos, W. L. (2021). Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing in the Philippines: Policy and governance challenges and recommendations. Marine Policy, 130, 104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104573
  7. Ballesteros, E., et al. (2021). The role of experiential learning in promoting environmental awareness among young learners. *Environmental Education Research, 27*(3), 459–475.
  8. Bazzani, C., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R. M., & Canavari, M. (2018). Revisiting consumers’ valuation for local and organic food using a non-hypothetical choice experiment: Does personality matter? Food Quality and Preference, 64, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.020
  9. Blanco, A. C., Nadaoka, K., & Tanaka, K. (2019). Sustainable coastal and marine resource management in the Philippines: A review. Ocean & Coastal Management, 168, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.019
  10. Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. *Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3*(2), 77–101.
  12. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2021). Multimodal methods for engaging youth in climate change: Visual narratives and participation. Youth & Society, 53(5), 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X20917427
  13. Caballero-Guzmán, A., Nowack, B., & Wick, P. (2021). Marine education and science identity: Enhancing student engagement through citizen science projects. Environmental Education Research, 27(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1842015
  14. Carfora, V., Caso, D., Sparks, P., & Conner, M. (2019). Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.011
  15. Cava, F., et al. (2022). Exploring ocean literacy in school curricula: Gaps and opportunities. *Journal of Environmental Education, 43*(1), 60–75.
  16. Chrysochou, P., Krystallis, A., & Rungie, C. (2016). The role of experience in sustainability labeling. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3140–3145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.020
  17. Cinner, J. E., Huchery, C., & MacNeil, M. A. (2018). Evaluating social and ecological systems to inform marine resource management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 33(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.003
  18. Cinner, J. E., Huchery, C., MacNeil, M. A., Graham, N. A. J., McClanahan, T. R., Maina, J., ... & Mouillot, D. (2018). Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(27), E6116–E6125. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708001115
  19. Collier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. *American Anthropologist, 59*(4), 843–859.
  20. David, C. P. C., Uy, K. H., & Soriano, S. R. (2022). Marine pollution in the Philippines: An assessment of current threats and proposed solutions. Environmental Challenges, 7, 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100524
  21. David, L., Miller, K., & Marquez, D. (2022). The impact of plastic pollution on marine biodiversity: Assessing the response of coastal communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 183, 113833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113833
  22. Davis, K., & Young, R. (2020). Using visual methods to explore student engagement in science education: A case study of marine conservation. *Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29*(2), 189–200.
  23. De Lara, R. L., & Lumibao, F. S. (2017). Integrating local marine biodiversity education in junior high school curriculum in coastal Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science, 146(1), 29–38.
  24. Demarest, A. (2015). Place-based curriculum design: Exceeding standards through local investigations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315818592
  25. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). (2020). State of the Philippine Environment 2020. Manila, Philippines: DENR.
  26. Doney, S. C., Busch, D. S., Cooley, S. R., & Kroeker, K. J. (2020). The impacts of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems and reliant human communities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45, 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083019
  27. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
  28. FAO. (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  29. Fauville, G., McHugh, M., Domegan, C., Mäkitalo, Å., & Sprain, L. (2018). Ocean literacy in education: A review of the effects of ocean-based education programs on student knowledge and attitudes. Marine Policy, 87, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.020
  30. Fauville, G., McHugh, M., Domegan, C., Mäkitalo, Å., & Sprain, L. (2018). Ocean literacy in education: A review of the effects of ocean-based education programs on student knowledge and attitudes. Marine Policy, 87, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.020
  31. Fenech, R., & Zonca, M. (2021). Visual food cues and adolescent decision-making: Insights for nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2020.12.005
  32. Fletcher, R., & Potts, A. (2019). Integrating marine education into the secondary school curriculum. *Marine Education Journal, 34*(2), 121–134.
  33. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
  34. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2020). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
  35. Garcia, J. D., & Lorenzo, A. C. (2023). Engaging students in climate and ocean literacy through visual storytelling. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 29(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2145578
  36. Garcia, M. R., & Lorenzo, J. R. (2023). Enhancing environmental education through photo-elicitation: An analysis of student engagement. Environmental Education Research, 29(2), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.1855345
  37. Garcia, M. R., & Lorenzo, M. C. (2023). Visual narratives and student engagement: Using photo-elicitation in environmental education. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(1), 45–56.
  38. Garcia, R. M., & Lorenzo, E. P. (2023). Photo-elicitation as a tool for environmental awareness among secondary students: A Philippine perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 45–59.
  39. Gough, A., Sharpley, B., & Thomas, K. (2020). Environmental education and the possibilities of online learning. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 36(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.35
  40. Greene, J. C. (2020). Using visual elicitation to examine students’ environmental awareness. *Environmental Research Letters, 15*(9), 094034.
  41. Guillemin, M. (2004). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a tool for research. *Qualitative Health Research, 14*(2), 272–283.
  42. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
  43. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. *Visual Studies, 17*(1), 13–26. Inter governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES Secretariat. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
  44. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (2020). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
  45. Lee, H., & Nam, Y. (2017). Cross-cultural perspectives on seafood quality attributes: A comparison between Korean and European consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12210
  46. Liu, S., & Lin, C. (2022). Community-based science learning and environmental stewardship among adolescents: A case from coastal regions. Environmental Education Research, 28(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1956600
  47. Liu, X., Lee, H., & Wu, H. (2014). The role of science education in fostering environmental awareness. *Journal of Environmental Education, 45*(3), 161–174.
  48. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, W. (2020). Sustainable seafood consumption in China: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived trust, and eco-labels. Marine Policy, 112, 103766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103766
  49. Lu, L., & Qiu, H. (2016). The influence of traceability and information technology on consumer trust in seafood products. British Food Journal, 118(2), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2015-0360
  50. Martínez, L., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, M. (2018). Intrinsic and extrinsic cues in seafood quality evaluation: Consumer perspectives. Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(3), 341–353.
  51. Martins, A. P., Silva, A. M., & Correia, C. (2021). Consumer perception of seafood freshness and safety: A review. Food Control, 121, 107635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107635
  52. Masson, L. F., Lawrie, M. S., & Macdiarmid, J. I. (2016). Labeling and consumer confidence in seafood: The role of extrinsic cues. Appetite, 105, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.015
  53. Mendoza, J. T., & Cruz, A. R. (2021). Developing environmental awareness through visual methods: A study among high school students in coastal communities. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 21–29.
  54. Mendoza, L. A., & Cruz, M. A. (2021). Enhancing environmental literacy through visual-based learning in science classrooms. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 47(2), 89–102.
  55. Mendoza, M. E., & Cruz, L. J. (2021). Visual learning strategies in science education: A review of recent practices. Science Education International, 32(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.20852/sei.2021.147
  56. Mendoza, M. G., & Cruz, R. C. (2021). Place-based marine education in Philippine public schools: Addressing biodiversity and sustainability in coastal curricula. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-021-00054-5
  57. Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Smith, A., & Stuart, J. (2019). Youth-engaged visual methods in environmental learning: Using photo-voice to promote sustainability among high school learners. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), 1144–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0186
  58. Morgan, D. L. (2012). Succeeding with qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
  59. Navarro-Perez, M., & Tidball, K. G. (2018). Challenges of biodiversity education: A review of education strategies for biodiversity education. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18497/iejee-greenjournal.466749
  60. Nguyen, A. T., & Cruz, M. R. (2022). Empowering youth in rural communities through photo-elicitation: A participatory environmental approach. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 23(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09712-z
  61. Nguyen, T. H., Vo, D. Q., & Le, P. T. (2022). Green packaging and seafood marketing: The role of environmental cues in shaping consumer perception. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102999
  62. Pauly, D., & Zeller, D. (2016). Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nature Communications, 7, 10244.
  63. Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., & Vanhonacker, F. (2016). Fish consumption and consumer perception: Quality, health, and freshness. Appetite, 96, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.020
  64. Power, E. M., Norman, M. E., & Dupuis, S. (2020). Participatory visual methods in youth environmental education: Photovoice as a tool for reflection. Children’s Geographies, 18(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1655142
  65. Rahman, L., Santos, E., & Yulo, M. (2021). Photo-elicitation as a tool for promoting marine environmental awareness among high school students in coastal regions. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9420
  66. Ramkissoon, H. (2020). Place affect interventions during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A framework for promoting sustainable behavior. Sustainability, 12(9), 3615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093615
  67. Ramos, J. M., & Dizon, E. I. (2021). Youth and marine stewardship: Perspectives from coastal communities in Mindanao. Philippine Journal of Environmental Studies, 16(2), 22–35.
  68. Roberts, J. (2018). Coastal education and its impact on local marine awareness.
  69. Santos, M. & Javier, D. (2020). Engaging Filipino youth in conservation education through participatory photography. Philippine Journal of Environmental Education, 12(1), 65–78.
  70. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (2021). Promoting conservation behaviors: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101508.
  71. Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data: A guide to the principles of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  72. Smith, M. K., & Basiliio, R. (2019). Community-based marine biodiversity monitoring: Involving youth in coastal conservation through education. *Philippine Journal of Science Education, 45*(2), 67–78.
  73. Sofija, E., Cleary, A., Sav, A., Sebar, B., & Harris, N. (2022). How emerging adults perceive elements of nature as resources for wellbeing: A qualitative photo-elicitation study. Youth, 2(3), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030027​:contentReference[oaicite:24]{index=24}
  74. Srivastava, A., & Kumar, R. (2019). Promoting marine environmental awareness among youth through visual-based learning approaches. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2019.100004
  75. Taylor, C. W., & Fraser, D. J. (2019). Visual-based learning and environmental literacy in high school science education. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 904-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1594539
  76. Taylor, P. C., & Fraser, B. J. (2019). Contemporary science learning environments: Towards an integrated pedagogy for sustainability. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1554602
  77. Taylor, P. C., & Fraser, B. J. (2019). Culturally inclusive science education: A focus on student voice and visual methods. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1076–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1591269
  78. Thakur, S., & Shekhawat, P. S. (2022). Impact of participatory learning on students’ knowledge of biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Education and Research, 8(2), 45–58.
  79. Thompson, R. J., et al. (2019). Photo-elicitation as a method for engaging students in marine education.
  80. United Nations. (2017). The oceans and the law of the sea. United Nations Publication.
  81. Vanhonacker, F., & Verbeke, W. (2016). Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9590-x
  82. Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Sioen, I., Van Camp, J., & De Henauw, S. (2015). Perceived importance of sustainability and ethics related to fish: A consumer behavior perspective. Appetite, 91, 61–72.
  83. Vierros, M., Harden-Davies, H., Escobar-Pemberthy, N., Satterthwaite, E., & Nielsen, H. (2021). Biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction: Marine genetic resources and benefit-sharing. Marine Policy, 132, 104634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104634
  84. Villanueva, A. L., & Torres, J. M. (2018). Community-based learning and photo documentation in Philippine science education. Asia Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0023-2
  85. Wang, C. C. (2002). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 11(6), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1089/15246090260325850
  86. Wang, C. C., & Burris, V. (2006). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to environmental health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(9), 1464–1468. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8438
  87. Wee, B., Harbor, J., & Shepardson, D. P. (2021). Visualizing climate change: Exploring the potential of photo-elicitation in climate education. Journal of Environmental Education, 52(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2021.1903285
  88. Wee, L. L., Tan, K. H., & Ang, S. Y. (2021). Empowering student voice through photo-elicitation: An inquiry into marine ecosystems. International Journal of Environmental Education, 17(4), 83–94.
  89. Wee, T. T., Goh, P. S. C., & Chia, K. K. (2021). Visual methods in environmental education: Empowering learners through photo-elicitation. Environmental Education Research, 27(4), 548–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1857334
  90. Wyles, K. J., et al. (2019). Fostering marine conservation awareness through school-based educational programs. Journal of Marine Education, 48(2), 94–108.
  91. Yore, L. D., & Chartier, T. (2016). Students’ scientific literacy and multimodal approaches in environmental science learning. Science Education International, 27(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v27.i3.6
  92. Young, J. A., Cowan, J., & Otter, S. (2016). Sensory evaluation and seafood quality: Implications for retail settings. Journal of Food Quality, 39(1), 58–67. 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic