HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 38 no. 7 (2025)

Digital Competence and Instructional Practices of Araling Panlipunan Teachers in Tantangan District: Input for Program Development

Mary Jean Miran | Cris John Bryan Dela Cruz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Integrating technology into education is essential in today’s digital world. This study examines the digital competence and instructional practices of Araling Panlipunan teachers in the Tantangan District to inform program development. Using a descriptive and correlational research design, the study compares digital competence with instructional practices. The total sample consisted of seventy-nine elementary school teachers, sixteen school heads, and sixteen school ICT coordinators. Statistical tools such as mean, standard deviation, Pearson-r, and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings indicate that teachers generally possess high digital proficiency but face challenges in creating original content and customizing instructional materials. Regression analysis showed that length of service had a significant negative relationship with digital competence, suggesting that teachers with longer service years tend to have lower digital skills. However, factors such as age, gender, and educational attainment did not significantly impact digital competence, implying that digital literacy training is accessible to all teachers regardless of background. A strong positive correlation was found between digital competence and instructional practices, meaning teachers with higher digital skills implement more effective teaching strategies. This underscores the importance of professional development programs to enhance digital literacy and pedagogical skills. To support teachers, capacity-building initiatives should be prioritized to improve instructional strategies, student engagement, and learning outcomes. Schools and policymakers must implement structured digital literacy programs to equip teachers with the necessary skills for 21st-century education. Strengthening digital competence will ultimately enhance the quality of teaching and learning in Araling Panlipunan and other subjects.



References:

  1. Aarsand, P. (2019). Categorization activities in Norwegian preschools: digital in identifying, articulating, and assessing. Front. Psychol. 10, 973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00973
  2. Abdul Karim, A., Khalid, F., Daud, M.Y. Din, R., & Zulkefle, D. F. (2016). The application of 21st Century ICT literacy model among teacher trainees. Turkish    Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15 (3), 151-161.
  3. Acedo, C., & Rojas, E. (2020). Global standards and local practices: integrating international leadership principles in philippine schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, 15(2), 85-99.
  4. Agsalud, P. L. (2017). Teaching effectiveness of the teacher education faculty members in Pangasinan State University Asingan Campus, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 16-22.
  5. Aguila, E. & Garces-Bacsal, R. (2021). Community involvement in Philippine education: a study of rural schools. Philippine Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 152-169.
  6. Ahmad, M., & Hassan, N. (2022). The role of leadership in enhancing school performance: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 243-259. DOI: 10.1108/JEA-06-2021-0153
  7. Ahmad, S. F. S., & Ismail, I. (2020). Leadership practices of elementary school Heads in Johor, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and       Instruction,   17(2), 237-260.
  8. Aldan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2 (1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.    2020261309
  9.  Alea, L., Fabrea, M., Roldan, R., & Farooqi, A. (2020). Teachers’ COVID-19 awareness, distance learning education experiences and perceptions institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and        Educational Research, 19(6), 127-144. https://doi.org/10. 26803/ijlter.19.6.8.
  10. Alegre, A., & Diaz, L. (2018). Perceived challenges and professiona  Development needs of public elementary school principals in the  Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(6), 1111-1126
  11. Ali, G., & Khalid, M. A. (2018). Leadership practices of public-school heads inPunjab, Pakistan. Journal of Educational Research, 21(3), 67-80.
  12. Al-Lily, A.E., Ismail, A.F., Abunasser, F.M., & Alqahtani, R.H.A. (2020). Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. Technology in Society, 63, 101317.    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101317
  13.  Ally, M. (2019). Transforming education in the digital age. Springer
  14. Almazan, A. S., Baniqued, R. P., & Gonzalez, J. M. (2017). Teacher competence in the digital age: A study on the integration of digital tools in Filipino classrooms. Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 13.
  15. Alvarez, A.J. (2020). The phenomenon of learning at a distance through emergency remote teaching amidst the pandemic crisis.
  16. Amhag, L., Hellstrom, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators’ use of    digital   tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 1-18.
  17. Anderson, T. (2016). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.
  18. Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge.
  19. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 127-143. Apelgren, Å. R., & Olsson, T. (ed) (2010). A Swedish perspective on pedagogical competence. Sweden: Uppsala University.
  20. Asio, J. M., Gadia, E. D., Abarintos, E. C., Paguio, D.P., & Balce, M. (2021). Internet connection and learning device availability of college    students: Basis for institutionalizing flexible learning in the new normal. Studies in Humanities and Education 2 (1), 56-69. https://doi.org/     10.48185/she.v2i1.224.
  21. Babbie, E. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning
  22. Baker, D., Hsu, P., & Chen, W. (2017). The digital divide in education: Age and technology adoption among educators. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 101-113.
  23. Barak, M. (2017). Cloud pedagogy: Utilizing web-based technologies for the promotion of social constructivist learning in science teacher preparation courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9691-3.
  24. Barker, R. (2018). Informed consent in social research: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
  25. Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.
  26. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.  Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
  27. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C.
  28. Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2012). Introduction to Information Science. Facet Publishing.
  29. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  30. Benson, V., Anderson, D., & Ooms, A. (2011). Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: Blended learning in business and management education. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.586676
  31. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. GL Assessment.
  32. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2014). Designing for teachers’ learning: A framework for improving professional development in digital literacy. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 113(1), 25–45.
  33. Breivik, P. S. (2016). Information literacy and lifelong learning: The workplace perspective. Routledge.
  34. Bruce, C. (2016). Informed learning. Association of College and Research Libraries.
  35. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 223–253)
  36. Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy: What young people need to know about digital media. In B. Bachmair (Ed.), Media Literacy in the Digital Age (pp. 59–71). Springer.
  37. Buckingham, D. (2015). The media education manifesto. Polity Press.
  38. Buckley, E., & Cowap, L. (2013). An evaluation of the use of Turnitin for       electronic submission and marking and as a formative learning     tool. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 562-570
  39. Burleson, B. R. (2011). A constructivist approach to listening. International Journal of Listening, 25(1-2), 27-46.
  40. Cabauatan, R. R., Uy, C., Manalo, R. A., & De Castro, B. (2021) Factors affecting intention to use blended learning approach in the tertiary level: A quantitative approach. Higher Education for the Future 8 (2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311211011934.
  41. Cabero-Almenara, J., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2016). The educational possibilities of Augmented Reality. Journal of New Approaches  in Educational Research, 5(1), 44-50.
  42. Callo, E. C., & Yazon, A. D. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing the readiness of faculty and students on online teaching and learning as an alternative delivery mode for the new normal. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8 (8), 3509-3518. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080826.
  43. Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2019). Assessing digital competence in secondary education. Issues, models and instruments. Issues In Information and Media Literacy:  Education, Practice And Pedagogy, 153-172.
  44. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. EUR 28558  EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  45. Carter, P., & Davidson, S. (2022). Stakeholder engagement in education management: a review of recent developments. International Journal     of Educational Management, 36(1), 58-72. DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-08-
  46. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press
  47. Castro Sánchez, J. J. and Alemán, E. C., (2019). Teachers’ opinion survey on the use of ICT tools to support attendance-based teaching. Journal Computers and Education, vol. 56, pp.911-915.
  48. CHED [Commission on Higher Education (2020). CHED Memorandum Order No. 4, Series of 2020. https://ched.gov.ph/2020-ched-memorandum-orders/.
  49. Coccoli, M., Guercio, A., Maresca, P. and Stanganelli. L. (2016) Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, Vol. 25, pp. 1003‐1011.
  50. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
  51. Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior   knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352-392.
  52. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
  53. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  54. Covello, S. (2010). A review of digital literacy assessment instruments. New             York, NY: Syracuse University, School of Education.
  55.  Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. Tech Trends 53(5). 10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1.
  56. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
  57. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2017). Implications for educational practice of the scienc learning and development. Applied Developmental Science 21(3), 97-140.
  58. Day, C. (2012). The new lives of teachers. Routledge
  59.  De la Pena-Bandalaria, M. (2007). Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a developing country setting: The Philippine experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.334.
  60. De La Salle University (2020). Coping with challenges and learning during the enhanced community quarantine period.          https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/2nd-term-faqs/.
  61. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  62. Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). National Digital Education Program. Manila: DepEd Publishing.
  63. Djawad, Y., Suhaeb, S., & Jaya, H. (2018, July). Innovation In Learning Through Digital Literacy at Vocational School of Health. In International Conference on Indonesian Technical Vocational Education and Association (APTEKINDO 2018) (pp. 239-245). Atlantis Press.
  64. Dotong, C. I., De Castro, E. L., Dolot, J. A., & Prenda, M. (2016). Barriers for educational technology integration in contemporary classroom environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(2), 13-20. http://oaji.net/articles/2016/17101465285680.pdf.
  65. Doyle, C. S. (2017). Information Literacy in an Information Society: A Concept for the Information Age. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and          Technology.
  66. Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (2016). Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. Library Unlimited.
  67. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
  68. Erstad, O. (2010). Educating the digital generation. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1, 56-70.
  69. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research           and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  70. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology changeHow knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284
  71. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to th  integration of technology in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 199-210.
  72. Eshet, Y. (2015). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13 (1), 93-106.
  73. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and  Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  74. Eshet-Alkali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital      literacy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 421–429.
  75. Estella, P., & Löffelholz, M. (2019). Media landscapes-Philippines. https://www.dbthueringen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbt_derivate_00046035ilm1- 2019200503.pdf.
  76. Esteve-Mon, F., Cela-Ranilla, J. M., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2016).            ETeach3D: Designing a 3D virtual environment for evaluating the digital competence of preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(6), 816–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116637191.
  77. European Commission (Ed) (2018). Proposal for a council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. New York: European Commission.
  78. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Luxemberg: Publications Office of The European Union.
  79. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
  80. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. JRC-IPTS.
  81. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
  82. Fitzgerald, M. A. (2017). Evaluating Information: Teaching Digital Literacy Skills. ALA Editions.
  83. Floridi, L. (2015). The online manifesto: being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer.
  84. From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence-between values, knowledge,         and skills. Higher Education Studies, 2017, 7(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43.
  85. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  86. Garzón-Artacho, E., Sola-Martínez, T., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage. Heliyon, 7(7), e07513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07513
  87. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  88. Gibson, R., Williams, K., & Wilkes, M. (2020). Ethical research in the digital age: A review of privacy concerns. Research Ethics Review, 15(4), 213-228.
  89. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley & Sons.
  90. Gilster, P. (2015). Digital literacy: navigating the internet and using    information wisely. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 48, 83-107.
  91. Gisbert, M., González, J., & Esteve, F. (2016). Competencia digital y competencia digital docente: Una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Educativa, 0, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/257631
  92. Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. McGraw-Hill Education.
  93. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., Bravo-Agapito, J., & Escribano-Ortiz, D. (2020). Analysis of teachers’ pedagogical digital competence: Identification of factors predicting their acquisition. Tech Know Learn, 26, 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09432-7
  94. Hagel, P. (2012). Establishing what is good practice in digital literacy development, assessment and evaluation for graduate employability (Unpublished report). Deakin University Library.
  95. Hague, C., & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum: A Futurelab handbook. Futurelab.
  96. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
  97. Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2015). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 81, 345–358.
  98. Hattie, J. (2015). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  99. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2015). How college students use the Web to conduct everyday life research. First Monday, 16(4).
  100. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2015). How today’s students use information. Project Information Literacy.
  101. Hine, C. (2016). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  102. Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Wiley.
  103. Howard, S. K., & Mozejko, A. (2015). Gender and technology in education: Issues and trends. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 101–109.
  104. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Teachers’ beliefs and technology integration practices: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 1–23.
  105. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. ICMJE.
  106. International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE standards for educators. ISTE.
  107. Jansen, B. J., & Rieh, S. Y. (2015). The seventeen theoretical constructs of information searching and information retrieval. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 240–267.
  108. Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473–481.
  109. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robinson, A. J. (2016). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press.
  110. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press.
  111. Jewitt, C. (2013). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
  112. Jisc. (2018). Developing digital literacies. https://jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing‐digital‐literacies
  113. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.
  114. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the “Battle of Seattle” to blogging. New Media & Society, 6(1), 87–95.
  115. Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Marttunen, M., & Hautala, J. (2018). Students’ online research and comprehension performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 321–334.
  116. Kimmel, D. C. (2017). Ethical issues in research: A global perspective. Academic Press.
  117. Kimmons, R. (2020). Technology integration and learning theory: Digital tools and student-centered learning. EdTech Books.
  118. Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2015). Education technology as a sociocultural and ideological practice. TechTrends, 59(2), 10–15.
  119. Kivunja, C. (2014). Theoretical perspectives of how digital natives learn. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 94–109.
  120. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
  121. Korte, W. B., & Hüsing, T. (2019). ICT in education: Digital competence and technology adoption among teachers. European Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 142–156.
  122. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 241–251.
  123. Koyunco, M. (2011). The impact of digital competence on academic performance of students. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM. https://search.proquest.com/openview/03bfc8bcf53b17b71b719b366ab1e6e8/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1536338
  124. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
  125. Kuhlthau, C. C. (2015). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
  126. Kupiainen, R., Sintonen, S., & Suoranta, J. (2016). Media literacy education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Peter Lang.
  127. Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  128. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  129. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 17–32). Peter Lang.
  130. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  131. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.
  132. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2015). Ethical issues in social research: An overview. Social Research Ethics, 22(2), 45–60.
  133. Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Polity Press.
  134. Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2021). Linking leadership to student learning: How and why leadership makes a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319872061
  135. Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.
  136. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2015). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. Alvermann et al. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of literacy (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). International Reading Association.
  137. Lieberman, A., & Mace, D. H. P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 77–88.
  138. Limberg, L., & Sundin, O. (2006). Teaching information seeking: Relating information literacy education to theories of information behavior. Information Research, 12(1).
  139. Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2014). Technology-enhanced professional learning: Processes, practices and tools. Routledge.
  140. Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.
  141. Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 39(3), 283–303.
  142. Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2019). Children’s data and privacy online: Growing up in a digital age. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  143. Lloyd, A. (2017). Information literacy and literacies of information: A mid-range theory and model. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 91–105.
  144. Manlangit, P., et al. (2020). Teacher motivation in the Philippines: Factors and implications. Journal of Education and Teaching Research, 13(3), 74–89.
  145. Martin, A. (2015). Digital literacy and digital skills for the 21st century. Journal of E-learning and Digital Media, 12(4), 481–490.
  146. Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2019). Budding scholars: Examining instructional design practices for online learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 1–9.
  147. Martin, M., & Grudziecki, S. (2016). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143.
  148. Martinez, H., et al. (2018). Teacher motivation and school performance: The role of quality education management. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 202–218.
  149. Martinez, P., & Gonzalez, L. (2020). Creating effective partnerships: The impact of external connections on school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 329–345.
  150. Martinez, R., & Lee, A. (2021). Resource allocation and its impact on school performance: A review of recent evidence. Journal of Education.
  151. Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching: More than fifty new instructional strategies for academic success. Solution Tree.
  152. Mateo, J. (2019). Challenges in digital education in rural Philippines. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 123–134.
  153. McNutt, M. K., et al. (2018). Defining authorship in scientific research. Accountability in Research, 25(4), 231-246.
  154.  Mendoza, A., & Cruz, R. (2020). Collaborative approaches to resource        management in schools: enhancing trust and engagement.         International Journal of School Leadership, 29(4), 413-429.
  155. Mendoza, C. R., & Ramirez, E. J. (2022). Educational leadership and school performance in SOCSKSARGEN: A quantitative analysis. Asian         Journal of Education and Social Studies, 14(1), 78-92. DOI: 10.9734/ajes/2022/v14i130267
  156. Mert, A. (2022). Parent attitudes and submissive behaviors in adolescents as social anxiety predictors, Educ. Res. Rev. Full, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 46–52, 2022, doi: 10.5897/ERR2021.4196
  157. Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220.
  158. Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367.
  159. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017-1054.
  160. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  161. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Educational Technology Publications..
  162. Montano, A. (2020). Building leadership capacity in schools: a focus on SOCSKSARGEN. Educational Leadership Journal, 42(1), 63-81.
  163. Mrvoljak-Theodoropoulou, I., Gari, A., & Mylonas, K. (2022). Young Adults’ Assertiveness in relation to parental acceptance-rejection in Greece and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120980967
  164. Munna, A. S. (2021). Instructional leadership and role of module leaders. International Journal of Educational Reform, 32(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879211042321
  165. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  166. Ng, W. (2012) why digital literacy is important for science [12] teaching and learning? Curriculum and Leadership Journal Vol. 19 Issue 10. 35 Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/why_digital_literacy_is_important_for_science_teac,34913.html?issueID=12610
  167. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers &  Education, 59(3), 1065-1078.
  168. Ng, W. (2015). New digital technology in education: conceptualizing professional learning for educators. Springer.
  169. Noura, M., Atiquzzaman, M., & Gaedke, M. (2019). Interoperability in internet of things: Taxonomies and open challenges. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(3), 796-809.
  170. Ozkan-Ozen, Y. D., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Analysing workforce development challenges in the Industry 4.0. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0167
  171. Pascua, C. P., & Alonzo, L. R. (2018). Challenges in developing digital competence among rural teachers in the Philippines. Journal of Education and Technology Research, 12(1), 45-56.
  172. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
  173. Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: what teachers need to know   (8th ed.). Pearson.
  174. Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2018). Psychology for the classroom: and social learning. Routledge.
  175. Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., & Perez-Maceira, J. J. (2021). “Fake News” or   Real Science? Critical thinking to assess information on COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 646909.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.646909
  176. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
  177. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. JRC Science for Policy Report.
  178. Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
  179. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
  180. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2015). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (4th ed.). Pearson.
  181. Resnik, D. B. (2018). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, and promoting justice. Springer.
  182.  Rheingold, H. (2012). Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. MIT Press.
  183.  Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
  184. Roblyer, M. D., & Hughes, J. E. (2015). Integrating educational technologyinto teaching (7th ed.). Pearson.
  185. Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Prepared to teach digitally? A mixed-methods study of teacher educators’ professional digital competence. Computers & Education, 97, 1-19.
  186. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness Guilford Press.
  187. Santos, M. (2021). Digital competence in rural schools: a case study of the Tantangan District. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 22(1), 45-59.
  188. Secker, J., & Morrison, C. (2016). Copyright and e-learning: a guide for  practitioners (2nd ed.). Facet Publishing.
  189. Sefton-Green, J., Nixon, H., & Erstad, O. (2009). The routledge international handbook of the learning sciences. Routledge.
  190. Selwyn, N. (2015). Education and technology: key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic.
  191. Selwyn, N. (2015). The digital age and digital practices: reconceptualizing the impact of technology on learning and society. Learning, Media, and Technology, 40(1), 22-36.
  192. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: key issues and debates.Bloomsbury Publishing.
  193. Shahbodin, F., Maria, M., Mohd, C. K. N. C. K., & Jaafar, N. A. (2019). Supporting future career of autistic learners via technology: Design and development of ibakery courseware. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(3).
  194. Shirky, C. (2011). Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. Penguin.
  195. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  196. Sieber, J. E. (2017). Planning ethically responsible research. SAGE Publications.
  197. Solomon, R. C. (2001). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3(2), 99-111.
  198. Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2018). Differentiation and the brain: how neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom (2nd ed.). Solution Tree.
  199. Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. CogentEducation, 5(1), 1519143.
  200. Spires, H. A., Lee, J. S., & Turner, K. L. (2019). Challenges faced by teachers in integrating technology in the classroom: A review of literature.   Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 215-230.
  201.  Spires, H. A., Lee, J. S., & Turner, K. L. (2019). Challenges faced by teachers in integrating technology in the classroom: A review of literature. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 215-230.
  202. Steneck, N. H. (2006). Research ethics: A handbook of best practices. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
  203. Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2016). Scholarly reading and the value of academic library collections: Results of a study in six universities. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(1), 145-164.
  204. Tewell, E. (2015). Putting critical information literacy into context: How and why librarians adopt critical practices in their teaching. In the Library with the Lead Pipe, 7(1).
  205. Thammasaeng, P., Pupat, P., & Petchaboon, S. (2016). Needs assessment of information and communication technology literacy (ICT literacy) of students in secondary educational service area. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(12).
  206. Thompson, I., Vanderlinde, R., & Mutton, T.     (2018). Family-school partnerships: a challenge for teacher education. Journal of Education           for Teaching, 44(3), 252-        257.
  207. Ting, Y. (2015). Tapping into students’ digital literacy and designing negotiated learning to promote learner autonomy, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 26,      pp. 25‐32
  208. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
  209. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical   beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
  210. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
  211. Tulo, A.H., & Gempes, G.P. (2016). The mediating effect of training perspective in the relationship between competency potential and career progression of technical vocational trainers. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 70,121.
  212. Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: the power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.
  213. UNESCO. (2011). Digital Literacy in Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing
  214. UNESCO. (2013). Policy guidelines for mobile learning. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  215. UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: learning objectives. paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444E.pdf
  216. Van Dijck, J. (2018). The culture of connectivity: a critical history of
  217. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society. SAGE Publications.
  218.  Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588.Social Media. Oxford University Press.
  219. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1-10.
  220. Villanueva, J. A. (2018). Competencies of principals of central elementary schools in Region IV-A, Philippines: Basis for the development of a training program. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 8(2), 91-96.
  221. Villaruel, M. T., & De Guzman, A. B. (2023). Professional development and its effects on teaching quality in SOCSKSARGEN. Journal of Philippine Education Research, 16(3), 99-114. DOI:    10.1080/JPER2023-0276
  222. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.
  223. Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Publications Office of the European Union
  224. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  225.  Wang, D., Oh, I. S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2015). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and            levels: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 173-212
  226. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.
  227. Weert, T. V. and Tatnall, A., (2017). Information and communication technologies and         real-life learning: new education for the new knowledge society, Springer, New         York.
  228. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework.
  229. Wiley, D. (2015). The MOOC and Open Educational Resources movement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(41). 
  230. Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2020). How does human resource management influence teacher job satisfaction and commitment? A sample from China. Journal of Education and Work, 33(7-8), 702-718.