Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 8 (2025)

Knowledge and Challenges in the Accessibility Law among PWDs and Building Owners in Dumaguete City: Implications for Effective Implementation

Marilou Gaspar – Pacana | Mick Ian M Cornelia

Discipline: social work

 

Abstract:

This study assessed the implementation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 344 (BP 344), the Accessibility Law, in Dumaguete City by examining the extent of knowledge and challenges experienced by building owners and persons with disabilities (PWDs). The research aimed to address the gap between policy awareness and practical compliance by examining whether a significant relationship exists between the level of knowledge and the challenges encountered in complying with accessibility requirements. Specifically, it aimed to: (1) determine the extent of knowledge of BP 344 among building owners and PWDs; (2) identify the extent of implementation challenges faced by both groups; and (3) examine the correlation between knowledge and challenges. A descriptive-correlational design was employed using stratified random sampling. A total of 220 validated responses (110 building owners and 110 PWDs) were analyzed using weighted mean and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results revealed that building owners (x = 4.04) and PWDs (x = 3.98) had a high level of knowledge on BP 344. However, both groups faced moderate implementation challenges (x = 3.15 for building owners; x = 3.24 for PWDs), particularly in areas such as limited technical guidance, financial constraints, and inconsistent enforcement. Spearman’s correlation results indicated no significant relationship between the extent of knowledge and the extent of challenges encountered (p > 0.05), suggesting that awareness alone does not guarantee effective implementation. The study highlights the need for enhanced technical and institutional support. It recommends the involvement of accredited accessibility consultants, regular monitoring with participation from the Persons with Disability Affairs Office (PDAO), and stronger collaboration between government agencies and stakeholders to ensure inclusive and barrier-free infrastructure. These findings contribute to the refinement of evidence-based policy and the implementation of practical improvements nationwide, as outlined in BP 344.



References:

  1. Andersson, J. E. (2021). Using building requirements as a means to create inclusion. In H. Egard, K. Hansson, & D. Wästerfors (Eds.), Accessibility denied: Understanding inaccessibility and everyday resistance to inclusion for persons with disabilities (p. 186). Routledge. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3hwwatjw 
  2. Astuti, P., Yani, M. T., Sulistyowati, E., & Masnun, M. A. (2021). Legal understanding of persons with disabilities regarding easy accessibility in performing worship in the mosque. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 618, 706–708. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.122
  3. Awang, K. W. (2023). Discovering persons with disabilities' physical barriers in accessing healthcare-built environment. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management, 8(33), 1–16.
  4. Baker, J. S. (2021, February 26). Strategies that help clients comply with accessibility requirements. Baker Law Group LLC. 
  5. Bognot, A. F. E., Wy, M. F. J., Bernardo, E. L., & Manzon, R. D. S. (2023). Assessment of access in the barrier-free facilities for persons with disabilities (PWD) in the Municipality of Guimba. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 8(8), 1–14.
  6. Bullen, P. (2022). How to choose a sample size (for the statistically challenged). tools4dev. https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size/
  7. Chiluba, B. C. (2019). Barriers of persons with physical disability over accessibility and mobility to public buildings in Zambia. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 6(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2019.006.01.8
  8. de Velasco Machado, L., & de Oliveira, U. R. (2021). Analysis of failures in the accessibility of university buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101654
  9. Ferri, D. (2025). Advancing an embodied understanding of accessibility for persons with disabilities. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huae049
  10. Fulgar, J. I. L. (2023, August 14). Building a more accessible Philippines. Philippine Daily Inquirer. https://tinyurl.com/y4f7xk7v 
  11. Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D., & Newman, T. B. (2013). Designing clinical research: An epidemiologic approach (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  12. Krahn, G. L., Walker, D. K., & Correa-De-Araujo, R. (2015). Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S2), S198–S206. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302182
  13. Krishnamoorthi, C., Shariff, A. A. M., Yahya, M. A., Hassan, M. S., & Kamaruddin, H. (2024). Protecting the well-being of the people with disabilities in achieving the nation’s sustainable development goals. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1304, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1304/1/012006
  14. Manalo-Asay, M., & Abiog-Adriano, D. (2024). Implementation of BP 344 (Accessibility Law) in both private and public establishments: A case study. International Journal of Innovative Studies, 7(1). https://ijois.com/index.php/ijoisjournal/article/view/93 
  15. Mindell, J. S., Mackett, R. L., Yaffe, S., & Amin, S. (2025). A meta-review of literature reviews of disability, travel and inequalities. Journal of Transport & Health, 41, 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101961
  16. Munthali, A. C., Swartz, L., Mannan, H., MacLachlan, M., Chilimampunga, C., & Makupe, C. (2019). “This one will delay us”: Barriers to accessing health care services among persons with disabilities in Malawi. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(6), 683–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1404148
  17. National Council on Disability Affairs. (n.d.). An act to enhance the mobility of disabled persons by requiring certain buildings, institutions, establishments, and public utilities to install facilities and other devices – IRR of BP 344. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ycxk99vs 
  18. Ndlovu, S. (2021). Humanness and Ableism: Construction and deconstruction of disability. In M. STEYN & W. MPOFU (Eds.), Decolonising the Human: Reflections from Africa on difference and oppression (pp. 65–85). Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/22021036512.7
  19. Osuagwu, C. E., & Nwoguji, S. C. (2023). Adjustment to disability: The issues involved special needs education from the lens of interdisciplinary dialogue: a festschrift in honour of Prof. Emeka D. Ozoji, 2(2).
  20. Pujiyanti, I. (2023, November). Study of accessibility principles for persons with disabilities in Yogyakarta City spatial regulation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (Vol. 1218, No. 1, p. 012016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1218/1/012016
  21. San Luis, M. M. (2022). Driving Change: How the Law Can Pave the Road for Accessible Public Transport for People with Mobility Issues in the Philippines. Ateneo LJ, 67, 411.
  22. The Asia Foundation. (2021). Philippine disability sector research: An initial analysis of access to social and public services, education, work and employment, and civic participation and governance. https://tinyurl.com/35pf73ew 
  23. Ubani, N. S., & Sanikpege, H. T. (2023). Barriers Globally Faced By Persons With Disabilities. Special Needs Education From The Lens Of Interdisciplinary Dialogue: A Festschrift In Honour Of Prof. Emeka D. Ozoji, 2(1).
  24. World Health Organization. (2022). Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600 
  25. Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, 206, 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic