Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 8 (2025)

Aligning Expectations and Perceptions: Analyzing Library User Satisfaction in Higher Education in Rural Philippines

Maricel T. Seno-Sanoria

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

In today’s rapidly evolving academic environment, libraries must continually adapt to meet the changing needs of their users to remain practical and relevant. Libraries are vital to academic life, providing key resources and services that support the learning and teaching needs of students and faculty. This study examines the alignment between user expectations and perceptions of academic library services in rural Philippine state universities, with a focus on frontline services, information resources, and facilities. Recognizing academic libraries as pivotal to student learning and research, the research addresses the underexplored context of rural institutions, where infrastructural and digital inequities pose significant challenges. Guided by a gap analysis framework and employing quantitative methods, data were gathered through a validated Likert-scale survey administered to 346 randomly selected undergraduate students who utilized library services during the academic year. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses revealed that while users hold high expectations, many services meet or exceed these expectations, notably in staff support, digital service provision, resource relevance, and communication channels. However, critical gaps emerged in borrowing policies, user education and training, technology availability, and physical facilities, highlighting areas for targeted improvement. The findings underscore the importance of context-specific assessments in enhancing library service quality and user satisfaction, thereby contributing to academic success and equitable access within rural higher education settings. This study offers valuable insights for library management, educators, and policymakers to develop responsive, user-centered strategies that align with evolving educational needs and support continuous service innovation across the Philippine higher education landscape.



References:

  1. Applegate, R. (2009). The library is for studying: Student preferences for study space. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.004
  2. Association of Research Libraries. (2020). LibQUAL+® 2020 survey results. https://www.libqual.org
  3. Bent, M., & Stockdale, A. (2009). Integrating information literacy as a habit of learning: Assessing the impact of a golden thread of IL in the curriculum. Journal of Information Literacy, 3(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.11645/3.1.124
  4. Boyce-Gudat, A. (2014). Improving library circulation policies: A case study at the College of William & Mary. Journal of Access Services, 11(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2014.891329
  5. Bury, S. (2016). Learning from faculty voices: A focus group study of faculty perceptions of information literacy instruction. Reference Services Review, 44(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2015-0047
  6. Cook, C., & Thompson, B. (2001). Psychometric properties of scores from the LibQUAL+™ survey. Library Trends, 49(4), 585–604.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Dey, R., & Kumar, R. (2021). Assessing service quality of academic libraries: A case study of university libraries in Haryana. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2021, 1–19. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5408
  9. Galagala, R. (2024). Modern academic libraries as dynamic, technology-driven environments: Enhancing learning and research in Philippine universities. Journal of Library and Information Science, 12(1), 45–60.
  10. Ghaedi, G., Namdar, B., & Talebi, M. (2020). Evaluating service quality gaps in academic libraries: A case study of religious higher education institutions. Library Management, 41(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-01-2020-0004
  11. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy: Defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills. College & Research Libraries, 70(4), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.5860/0700336
  12. Gyau, E., Owusu-Ansah, W., & Baah, P. (2021). User satisfaction as an indicator of library service quality in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 849–864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2020-0495
  13. Hernon, P., & Altman, E. (2010). Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of library customers (2nd ed.). American Library Association.
  14. Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008
  15. Julien, H., & Genuis, S. K. (2011). Librarians' experiences of the teaching role: A national survey of librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.09.005
  16. Joint, N. (2010). Digital and hybrid library services: The best of both worlds. Library Review, 59(4), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531011038511
  17. Koufogiannakis, D., & Slater, L. (2014). A new framework for assessing library collections and services. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 9(2), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8ZS5R
  18. Lonsdale, R. (2003). Impact of academic library resources on student learning. Library and Information Research, 27(86), 20–32.
  19. Manguil, E., Dela Cruz, M., & Santos, J. (2024). Assessing user satisfaction on ICT provision and learning environment in academic libraries. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 112–130.
  20. Mamta, & Kumar, A. (2023). Library service quality assessment using SERVQUAL and LibQUAL+: A comparative study. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 13(1), 45–58.
  21. Murray, L. (2015). User engagement and satisfaction in academic libraries: A case study. Library Management, 36(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2014-0132
  22. Ng, L. W., Tan, W. C., & Lee, K. H. (2013). The role of library resources in student academic success: A review of literature. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(5), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.06.006
  23. Ng, L. W., Tan, W. C., & Lee, K. H. (2023). Library service quality and user satisfaction: Empirical evidence from Southeast Asian universities. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 13(1), 24–38.
  24. Saunders, L. (2008). Perspectives on staff training and development in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.008
  25. Schmidt, A., & Etches, A. (2014). User experience (UX) design for libraries: The essentials. American Library Association.
  26. Shill, H. B., & Tonner, S. (2004). Creating a better place: Physical improvements in academic libraries, 1995–2002. College & Research Libraries, 65(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.2.123
  27. Sharma, A., & Sharma, S. (2021). Assessing the availability of ICT infrastructure in academic libraries in India. Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5211
  28. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L. (2008). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810847396
  29. Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2012). Scholarly reading and the value of academic library collections: Results of a study in six universities. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0000
  30. Togia, A., & Tsigilis, N. (2009). Measurement of library user satisfaction: A case study. Library & Information Science Research, 31(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.01.002
  31. Tulung, D., Borlagdan, K., & Reyes, P. (2024). Student satisfaction with frontline services in Philippine state universities: Challenges and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Higher Education, 23(1), 77–94.
  32. Ubat, M., & Villalon, F. (2024). Frontline service quality in academic libraries: Insights from Philippine university students. Library Trends in Southeast Asia, 5(1), 33–50.
  33. Vaid, A., Sharma, K., & Verma, R. (2024). User satisfaction with remote access to library e-resources: A study of academic institutions in Delhi. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 44(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.44.1.19050
  34. Wittkowski, K., & Scaglione, J. (2021). Creating responsive communication in academic libraries: Strategies for better engagement. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), Article 102419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102419
  35. Yi, Z., & Hwang, J. (2013). Use of social media and library services: Perceptions and practices. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2011-0128 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic