Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 8 (2025)

An Overview of Decentralized Cooperative Learning Strategies (Dec-LS) in Enhancing Student Proficiencyin Solving Quadratic Equations

Rizelle Anne Marisse V. Andaya | Christian A. Flores

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This literature study examined how Decentralized Cooperative Learning Strategies (DeC-LS) can enhance students' ability to solve quadratic equations. DeC-LS encourages collaborative learning, where students work together in small groups, take charge of their education, and share information to solve Mathematics problems. The review suggests that DeC-LS enhances student involvement, problem-solving abilities, and conceptual comprehension, making it an effective method for studying complex mathematical concepts. However, barriers to the successful implementation of DeC-LS include issues with classroom management, technological limitations, cultural resistance to nontraditional methods, and a lack of professional development for teachers. The evaluation advocates for the provision of sufficient resources, educator training, and institutional backing to facilitate the adoption of more student-centered, interactive pedagogical approaches. Confronting these problems will cultivate more inclusive and effective educational settings, hence improving student performance in mathematics, especially in the resolution of quadratic equations.



References:

  1. Abramczyk, A., & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: What teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733402
  2. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Unveiling the complexities of ‘Abstract Algebra’ in university mathematics education (UME): Fostering ‘conceptualization and understanding’ through advanced pedagogical approaches. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2355400. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2355400
  3. Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The contribution of Vygotsky's sociocultural theory in mediating L2 knowledge co-construction. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19
  4. Almasri, F. (2021). Collaborative learning in science education: Effects of students’ gender attitudes and achievement in science education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3853208
  5. Arsenis, P., Flores, M., & Petropoulou, D. (2022). Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1897086
  6. Arsyad, M., Guna, S., & Barus, S. (2024). Enhancing chemistry education through problem-based learning: Analyzing student engagement, motivation, and critical thinking. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 2(3), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v2i3.178
  7. Attardi, S. M., Mintz, N. M., & Rogers, K. A. (2022). Perspectives of online anatomy teachers: A neglected study population struggles with the invisible student. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2169
  8. Balasubramanian, K. (2023). Teacher roles in facilitating effective peer-to-peer learning: Strategies and guidelines. Thiagarajar College of Preceptors Edu Spectra, 5(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.34293/eduspectra.v5i2.01
  9. Bangara, M. R. (2022). Learner-centered teaching: Factors of implementation in a Chinese-American community (Doctoral dissertation). Azusa Pacific University. https://tinyurl.com/6f2wvw4t
  10. Baybayon, G. G., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2024). Students’ common errors in quadratic equations: Towards improved mathematics performance. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p83-98
  11. Berlinghoff, W. P., & Gouvêa, F. Q. (2020). Math through the ages: A gentle history for teachers and others (Expanded 2nd ed., Vol. 32). American Mathematical Society.
  12. Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
  13. Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
  14. Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Sunbury, S. (2020). The impact of high school life science teachers’ subject matter knowledge and knowledge of student misconceptions on students’ learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), ar9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
  15. Ciharova, M., Furukawa, T. A., Efthimiou, O., Karyotaki, E., Miguel, C., Noma, H., & Cuijpers, P. (2021). Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: A network meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(6), 563. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ccp0000654
  16. Cojorn, K., & Sonsupap, K. (2024). A collaborative professional development and its impact on teachers' ability to foster higher order thinking. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(2), 561–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21182
  17. Cruz, R. T., & Salazar, M. G. (2025). Empowering learners through decentralized cooperative learning in algebra: A focus on quadratic equations. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 30(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmer.2025.0302.134
  18. Dewey, A., Fletcher, J., & Mills, J. (2023). Teacher readiness for implementing cooperative and decentralized learning models: Challenges and opportunities. Education, 144(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2023.2174529
  19. Fadzil, N. M., & Osman, S. (2025). Scoping the landscape: Comparative review of collaborative learning methods in mathematical problem-solving pedagogy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15935
  20. Fateh, S., Ayangbola, O. T., Reid, J. W., Zakher, S. W., Kirbulut Gunes, Z. D., Phelps, A. J., & Rushton, G. T. (2024). Small group conversations in a POGIL-based class: How English learners engage in a joint knowledge construction process to reach a shared understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 741–752. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00624
  21. Goh, E., & Sigala, M. (2020). Integrating information & communication technologies (ICT) into classroom instruction: Teaching tips for hospitality educators from a diffusion of innovation approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 20(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2020.1740636
  22. Hennessy, S., D'Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
  23. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2021). Learning together and alone: The history of our involvement in cooperative learning. In Pioneering perspectives in cooperative learning (pp. 44–62). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/htpyhsbe
  24. Lee, H. J., Kim, S. Y., & Park, Y. S. (2023). Student-led learning groups in secondary algebra: Effects on engagement and performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102137
  25. Litster, K., MacDonald, B., & Shumway, J. F. (2020). Experiencing active mathematics learning: Meeting the expectations for teaching and learning in mathematics classrooms. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1499
  26. Loc, N. P., Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., & Ngoi, H. T. (2020). A teaching process of fostering students’ problem-solving skills: A case study of teaching the equation of a line. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1741–1751. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080510
  27. Lugosi, E., & Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555
  28. Ly, T., & Takuya, B. (2023). Analysis of Cambodian students’ errors in solving quadratic function problems using Newman’s error analysis. Cambodian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 32–44. https://tinyurl.com/3bwzy8r7
  29. Macachor, M. C. R., & Morados, P. J. (2024). Investigation of Grade 9 students’ errors in solving quadratic equations in one variable. Puissant, 5, 2114–2140. https://tinyurl.com/4vrjfama
  30. Mancilla, R., & Frey, B. (2020). A model for developing instructional design professionals for higher education through apprenticeship. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(2), 1–8. https://tinyurl.com/22nyndsr
  31. Maphosa, V. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on remote-based teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era: Rethinking technology availability and suitability in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02105. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/9684
  32. Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
  33. Namaziandost, E., Gilakjani, A. P., & Hidayatullah. (2020). Enhancing pre-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension through the use of Jigsaw technique. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1738833. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1738833
  34. Nguyen, L. T., & Kulm, G. (2020). Improving algebraic reasoning through cooperative learning models. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09945-z
  35. Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
  36. Panggabean, F. M., Barus, P. N. B., Tobing, R. A. A. L., & Marbun, R. (2024). The role of teacher as a learning facilitators in 21st century education. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah Transformatif, 8(12). https://tinyurl.com/4jtdsysy
  37. Patel, R., Gomez, A., & Liang, C. (2023). Digital decentralization in cooperative learning: Impacts on math education. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00324-7
  38. Prediger, S., Barzel, B., Hußmann, S., & Leuders, T. (2021). Towards a research base for textbooks as teacher support: The case of engaging students in active knowledge organization in the KOSIMA project. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01245-2
  39. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
  40. Rahardja, U., Ngadi, M. A., Budiarto, R., Aini, Q., Hardini, M., & Oganda, F. P. (2021). Education exchange storage protocol: Transformation into decentralized learning platform. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 782969). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.782969
  41. Reid O’Connor, B., & Norton, S. (2024). Exploring the challenges of learning quadratic equations and reflecting upon curriculum structure and implementation. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(1), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00434-w
  42. Revenko, I., Sosnova, M., Kolodina, L., Hlianenko, K., & Vlasenko, R. (2024). The exploration of pedagogical approaches and methods that are designed to stimulate the creative thinking of students. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society (BRAJETS), 137–146. https://tinyurl.com/2ufm687a
  43. Ruijuan, L., Srikhoa, S., & Jantharajit, N. (2023). Blending of collaborative and active learning instructional methods to improve academic performance and self-motivation of vocational students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(4), 130–135. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1412957
  44. Sannigrahi, S., Raj, M. B., Seenappa, B., Sharma, A. A., Reddy, S., Nobbay, E., Kant, A., Kumar, S., Dhailwal, B., Ganapathi, L., & Shet, A. (2025). “I can be a source of motivation”: Perspectives from stakeholders of the I’m Possible fellowship, a peer-led differentiated service delivery model for adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV in India. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.11.25323808
  45. Shakerian, S., Khoshgoftar, Z., Rezayof, E., & Amadi, M. (2020). The use of the Jigsaw cooperative learning technique for the health science students in Iran: A meta-analysis. Educational Research in Medical Sciences, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.102043
  46. Silalahi, T. F., & Hutauruk, A. F. (2020). The application of cooperative learning model during online learning in the pandemic period. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(3), 1683–1691. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.xxx
  47. Silva, H., Lopes, J., Morais, E., & Dominguez, C. (2023). Fostering critical and creative thinking through the cooperative learning jigsaw and group investigation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 261–282. https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/80
  48. Singh, A., Sharma, S., & Paliwal, M. (2021). Adoption intention and effectiveness of digital collaboration platforms for online learning: The Indian students’ perspective. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(4), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2020-0070
  49. Singh, A., Sinha, S., Verma, S. B., & Singh, B. K. (2024). Benefits and challenges of decentralization in education for resource optimization and improved performance. In Decentralized Systems and Distributed Computing (pp. 163–187). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394205127.ch8
  50. Siregar, H. A., Ompusunggu, A., Pangaribuan, D., Tumangger, R. R., Zega, E. A., Panjaitan, Y., & Sinaga, L. A. (2024). Development of cooperative learning model in increasing students' interest in learning. International Journal of Advanced Academic, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.3951.vol1iss2no09pp60
  51. Sujatha, S., & Vinayakan, K. (2022). The role of collaborative learning in mathematics education: A review of research and practice. Indo American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Review, 6(2), 200–206. https://tinyurl.com/2cshenwj
  52. Tadesse, T., Ware, H., Asmare, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2024). Enhancing student engagement and outcomes: The effects of cooperative learning in an Ethiopian University’s classrooms. Education Sciences, 14(9), 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090975
  53. Trabelsi, Z., Alnajjar, F., Parambil, M. M. A., Gochoo, M., & Ali, L. (2023). Real-time attention monitoring system for classroom: A deep learning approach for student’s behavior recognition. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010048
  54. Tran, V. D., & Lewis, R. B. (2021). A meta-analysis of cooperative learning effects on mathematics achievement. Educational Review, 73(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705890
  55. Virvidaki, A., Milakis, E. D., Argyrakou, C. C., Vasilara, A., Bampouli, I., & Charalampidis, G. (2024). Decentralization dynamics and their impact on special education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 16(1), 10–48047. https://doi.org/10.48047/intjecse/v16i1.16
  56. Vives, E., Poletti, C., Robert, A., Butera, F., Huguet, P., ProFAN Consortium, & Régner, I. (2024). Learning with Jigsaw: A systematic review gathering all the pieces of the puzzle more than 40 years later. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241230064
  57. Wang, M. T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2020). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 5(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00115-z
  58. Wilkie, K. J. (2024). Creative thinking for learning algebra: Year 10 students’ problem solving and problem posing with quadratic figural patterns. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101550
  59. Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
  60. Yang, X. (2023). A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning. TechTrends, 67(4), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
  61. Yang, K. B., Echeverria, V., Lu, Z., Mao, H., Holstein, K., Rummel, N., & Aleven, V. (2023, April). Pair-up: Prototyping human-AI co-orchestration of dynamic transitions between individual and collaborative learning in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581398
  62. Zitha, I., Mokganya, G., & Sinthumule, O. (2023). Innovative strategies for fostering student engagement and collaborative learning among extended curriculum programme students. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121196

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic