Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 8 (2025)

Enhancing Grade 8 Proficiency in Analyzing Ohm’s Law Concepts through the GameMapPro Method

Rod James L. Bande | Jannien Dora H. Cabahit | Kharissma Martina C. Macatual | Cherymay A. Enero A. Enero | Ruby I. Denden | Joy A. Bellen

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Ohm’s Law remains a complex topic for many Grade 8 students due to its abstract nature, making effective instructional strategies crucial for improving conceptual understanding. This action research aimed to address this challenge by implementing the GameMapPro method—an instructional strategy that combines game-based learning, concept mapping, and teacher-guided worksheets—in a public high school. A total of 28 participants were involved to improve their class proficiency level (CPL) in Ohm’s Law. To assess progress, pre-tests were administered before the intervention, and post-tests were given after each of the three instructional sessions using GameMapPro. Data triangulation, using scores, observations, and interviews, strengthened the validity and reliability of the results. CPLs improved significantly, rising from 14.29% to over 85% across the three sessions, while mean scores increased notably in each session. Observations and interviews further revealed increased student engagement and independent application of concepts. The findings indicate that GameMapPro is a practical approach for enhancing students' understanding of Ohm’s Law. However, limitations such as the small sample size and the localized context must be taken into account. This study suggests that interactive and integrative methods, such as GameMapPro, can enrich science education when adapted thoughtfully to specific classroom environments.



References:

  1. Acera, F. S. (2022). The use of strategic intervention materials in science (SIM-S) improves the academic performance of the learners. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 5(4), 69–77. https://www.ijassjournal.com/2022/V5I4/414665472.pdf
  2. Ainscow, M., & Messiou, K. (2021). Inclusive inquiry: An innovative approach for promoting inclusion in schools. Revista Latinoamericana De Educación Inclusiva, 15(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-73782021000200023
  3. Alcantara, K. R., & Roleda, L. S. (2017). Fast feedback methods in teaching G7 physics. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1176–1179. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7532
  4. Anbiya, K., Muhibbudin, N., Khaldun, I., & Yusrizal, N. (2023). Integration of problem-based learning model with guided inquiry worksheet to enhance scientific process skills and critical thinking abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8328–8334. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4724
  5. Bird, J. (2021). Capacitors and capacitance. In Bird’s electrical and electronic principles and technology (7th ed., pp. 134–154). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/4nw47upp
  6. Cagatan, A. N. P., & Quirap, E. A. (2024). Collaborative learning and learners’ academic performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i03-57
  7. Cayubit, R. F. O. (2021). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
  8. Celeste, R. J., & Osias, N. (2024). Challenges and implementation of technology integration: Basis for enhanced instructional program. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(2), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i2.2656
  9. Dela Cruz Jr., R. M., & Castillo, A. A. (2024). Effect of concept mapping teaching strategy on the performance in mathematics of Grade 10 students. International Journal of Scientific and Management Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i4p129
  10. Department of Education. (2012). DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2012: Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of Grades 1 to 10 of the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum (BEC) Effective School Year 2012–2013. https://tinyurl.com/6a9d3tb7
  11. Department of Education. (2012). DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2012: Policy Guidelines on Addressing Learning Gaps and Implementing a Reading and Writing Program in Secondary Schools Effective School Year (SY) 2012–2013. https://tinyurl.com/4yj45crw
  12. Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 34, s. 2022: School Calendar and Activities for the School Year 2022–2023. https://tinyurl.com/5ry3shn8
  13. Dionson, J. J. (2020). Interactive simulations in understanding concepts of electricity. International Journal of Research & Development Organization – Journal of Applied Science, 5(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3978599
  14. Dugan, J. C., & Ricafort, J. D. (2023). Effectiveness of developed learning activity sheets (LASS) in improving the performance of students in Grade 9 Chemistry. American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science (ARJHSS), 6(5), 62–69. https://tinyurl.com/59kmh4ym
  15. Esparcia, R., Futalan, M. C. Z., & Piñero, B. (2024). Learners’ scaffolding techniques: Their advantages in learning mathematics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11185028
  16. Frondozo, C. E., & Yang, L. (2023). Feedback orientation and learning-related academic emotions: An exploratory study in Filipino university students. In Positive psychology and positive education in Asia: Understanding and fostering well-being in schools (pp. 57–75). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5571-8_4
  17. Hadijah, H., Isnarto, I., & Walid, W. (2022). The effect of immediate feedback on mathematics learning achievement. JURNAL PIJAR MIPA, 17(6), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i6.4172
  18. Hank, C., & Huber, C. (2024). Do peers influence the development of individuals’ social skills? The potential of cooperative learning and social learning in elementary schools. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 9(2), 747–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-024-00151-8
  19. Hartt, M., Hosseini, H., & Mostafapour, M. (2020). Game on: Exploring the effectiveness of game-based learning. Planning Practice and Research, 35(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1778859
  20. Hastuti, I. D., Mariyati, Y., Sutarto, S., & Nasirin, C. (2020). The effect of guided inquiry learning model to the metacognitive ability of primary school students. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 8(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v8i1.2615
  21. Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
  22. Kimuya, A. (2023). The modified Ohm’s law and its implications for electrical circuit analysis. Eurasian Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, 4(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.55696/ejset.1373552
  23. Lansangan, R., & Orleans, A. (2024). Exploring Filipino students’ critical thinking skills: Basis for enhancement of science laboratory class delivery. Science Education International, 35(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i3.11
  24. Macayan, V., Baguistan, D., & Golias, J. (2022). Game-based activities and gamification in the mastery of science process skills: A systematic literature review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 8(7), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra10950
  25. Marcelo, Y. G. D. G., & Baptista, V. E. G. (2023). Concept map-based alternative instructional resource (AIR) in science. Divine Word International Journal of Management and Humanities, 2(4), 538–550. https://hal.science/hal-04325413v1/document
  26. Mitchell, B., & Co, J. (2024). The impact of implementing gamification elements on motivation, engagement and academic achievement. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Research (pp. 175–184). Academic Conferences International Ltd. https://doi.org/10.34190/icer.1.1.3113
  27. Nuñez, M. R., & Rosales, S. (2021). Inclusive education: Perceptions and attitudes among Filipino high school teachers. The Asian ESP Journal, 17(6.1), 151–172. https://tinyurl.com/dn3wpymv
  28. O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7
  29. Pacheco-Velazquez, E., Rodés, V., & Salinas-Navarro, D. (2024). Developing learning skills through game-based learning in complex scenarios: A case in undergraduate logistics education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2219
  30. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence (D. E. Berlyne & M. Piercy, Trans.; 1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164730
  31. Popat, Y. (2021). Ohm’s law: Misconceptions of the students at secondary and senior secondary level. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2021.v05i12.014
  32. Ramteke, S., & Tripathi, L. (2024). The effects of active learning and their approach on students' engagement. International Journal of Research Culture Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2017/IJRCS/202401003
  33. Rogayan, D., Jr., & Bautista, J. (2019). Filipino students' preferred motivational strategies in science: A cross-sectional survey. International Research Journal of Engineering, 3(2), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v3i2.6828
  34. Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage. https://tinyurl.com/42bp6hj6
  35. Tomkelski, M. L., Baptista, M., & Richit, A. (2023). Physics teachers’ learning on the use of multiple representations in lesson study about Ohm’s law. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12906
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic