Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 8 (2025)

Reading Comprehension and Habits of Year 8 Students in Denla British School After Using theAccelerated Reader (AR) Star Test

Robelle B. Mudat

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Despite the widespread use of the Accelerated Reader (AR) STAR test in schools, a gap remains in understanding its long-term impact on students’ reading comprehension and attitudes, particularly within international educational contexts. This quantitative study addressed that gap by investigating 33 Year 8 students at Denla British School who have used the AR program consistently for five years. The research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in enhancing literal, inferential, and critical comprehension, as well as its influence on students’ enjoyment, engagement, and attitudes toward reading. A researcher-developed questionnaire was used for data collection, comprising a cognitive test with 39 comprehension questions and a survey exploring students’ perceived improvements, helpful features, and challenges related to the STAR test. The tool was reviewed for content validity and piloted with Year 7 students, resulting in refinements to the layout and instructions. It yielded a reliability coefficient of 0.5, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. Results showed that students performed above average in literal and inferential comprehension, but only at an average level in critical comprehension. While students appreciated adaptive difficulty, genre variety, and feedback features, they also cited issues such as time constraints, limitations with multiple-choice questions, and technical problems. Correlation analysis revealed a weak relationship between comprehension and reading attitudes. Overall, the study concluded that while AR supports basic reading comprehension, it has a limited impact on critical thinking and intrinsic reading motivation.



References:

  1. Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34(4), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.003
  2. Brozo, W. G., & Flynt, E. S. (2008). Motivating students to read in the content classroom: Six evidence‐based principles. The Reading Teacher, 62(2), 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.2.9
  3. Cockerill, M., Thurston, A., & O'Keeffe, J. (2023). Using fluency and comprehension instruction with struggling readers to improve student reading outcomes in English elementary schools. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100264
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  5. Deng, L., Zhou, Y., & Hu, Q. (2022). Off-task social media multitasking during class: Determining factors and mediating mechanism. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00321-1
  6. Dordinejad, F. G., Hakimi, H., Ashouri, M., Dehghani, M., Zeinali, Z., Daghighi, M. S., & Bahrami, N. (2011). On the relationship between test anxiety and academic performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1416–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.372
  7. Erdem, A. (2015). A research on reading habits of university students: (Sample of Ankara University and Erciyes University). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3983–3990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1145
  8. Farha, N. A., & Rohani, R. (2019). Improving students’ reading comprehension of report text with KWL strategy. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i1.30244
  9. Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019). The internet and Facebook usage on academic distraction of college students. Computers and Education, 134, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.005
  10. Gilakjani, A. P. (2016). How can students improve their reading comprehension skills? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201
  11. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. R. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn (1st ed.). Routledge.
  12. Hong, J., Tai, K., Hwang, M., & Lin, C. (2022). Social comparison effects on students’ cognitive anxiety, self-confidence, and performance in Chinese composition writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060421
  13. Huang, S. (2012). A mixed method study of the effectiveness of the Accelerated Reader program on middle school students’ reading achievement and motivation. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 51(3). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss3/5
  14. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2011). Just plain reading: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350–377. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.2
  15. Karadeniz, A., & Can, R. (2015). A research on book reading habits and media literacy of students at the Faculty of Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 4058–4067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1155
  16. Kelly, K., Laminack, L., & Vasquez, V. (2023). Teaching reading through critical comprehension. Corwin Connect. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mpw7nk5w
  17. Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707
  18. Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. W. (2022). Reading comprehension I: Discourse. In The science of reading: A handbook (2nd ed., pp. 239–260). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119705116.ch11
  19. Kirby, J. R. (2007). Reading comprehension: Its nature and development. In Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development (pp. 1–8). Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network. https://tinyurl.com/58ksb68b
  20. Krashen, S. D. (2003). The (lack of) experimental evidence supporting the use of Accelerated Reader. Journal of Children's Literature, 29(2), 16–30. https://tinyurl.com/bdz35bsp
  21. Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Morrow, L. M., Woo, D. G., Meisinger, E. B., Sevcik, R. A., Bradley, B. A., & Stahl, S. A. (2006). Teaching children to become fluent and automatic readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1
  22. Mala, D. (2019). Rocky road to academic excellence. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4p3mwkkx
  23. Napa-Rodríguez, B. (2025). Reading habit in students' reading comprehension. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 11, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v11n2.2501
  24. Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for e-learning in Northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0034-x
  25. Orfus, S. (2008). The effect of test anxiety and time pressure on performance. The Huron University College Journal of Learning and Motivation, 46(1). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/hucjlm/vol46/iss1/7
  26. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
  27. Purdy, E. R., & Popan, E. (2023). Descriptive research. EBSCO Research Starters. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5ev93nsn
  28. Renaissance Learning. (2021). Accelerated Reader. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5azbsj9k
  29. Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  30. Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The importance of four skills: Reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v1i1.p29-31
  31. Schenck, A. (2018). Accelerated Reader implementation and student reading attitudes (Master’s thesis). California State University. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/290
  32. Smith, A., & Westberg, K. (2011). Student attitudes toward Accelerated Reader: Thanks for asking. Current Issues in Education, 14(2). https://tinyurl.com/42cp93d2
  33. Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
  34. Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067
  35. Spiller, A. D. (2020). The impact of Accelerated Reader on student achievement, reading comprehension, growth, and motivation to read (Doctoral dissertation). Trevecca Nazarene University.
  36. Vollands, S. R., Topping, K. J., & Evans, R. M. (1999). Computerized self-assessment of reading comprehension with the Accelerated Reader: Action research. Wordpress. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/2jr3e3e9
  37. Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. Teachers College Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED525135
  38. Whitten, C., Labby, S., & Sullivan, S. L. (2016). The impact of pleasure reading on academic success. Journal of Multidisciplinary Graduate Research, 2, 48–64. https://tinyurl.com/9wkxmcjw
  39. Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 66, 32–37. https://tinyurl.com/3zx5eayb
  40. Wonglao, J. (2022). A survey study of English reading comprehension problems as perceived by grade 6 students in Thailand (Independent study). Thammasat University. https://tinyurl.com/mus9eaj5
  41. Zaccoletti, S., Altoè, G., E Mason, L. (2020). Enjoyment, anxiety and boredom, and their control-value antecedents as predictors of reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 79. https://tinyurl.com/y8wj4p67

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic