Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 41 no. 10 (2025)

Reviewing Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms for Sustainable Implementation of Sibonga Community College

Marian Otero | June Rey A. Villegas | Jayvie Bryle C. Camilo | Ariel Ramos

Discipline: Rural Estate Management

 

Abstract:

This mixed-methods study investigated the implementation of transparency and accountability mechanisms at Sibonga Community College, utilizing the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory as a guiding framework. The research addressed challenges in institutional governance despite the presence of regulatory policies such as the Anti-Red Tape Act (Republic Act 9485), emphasizing the critical role of leader-follower relationships in fostering effective transparency and accountability practices. The study aimed to assess the current status of these mechanisms, identify barriers to their implementation, and develop tailored strategies for sustainable improvement within the college’s unique context. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were gathered through a structured survey administered to 120 participants, comprising administrators, faculty, staff, and students. Statistical analysis indicated moderate levels of transparency and accountability (M=3.42, SD=0.86), with significant variations observed across departments (p<0.05). Building on these results, qualitative data were collected through indepth interviews and focus group discussions with 19 key stakeholders. Thematic analysis revealed three principal barriers: resource limitations, inconsistencies in procedures, and communication gaps between leaders and members. Integration of findings demonstrated that higher quality leader-member relationships were positively associated with more effective transparency and accountability practices (r=0.68 and r=0.72, p<0.01). Qualitative insights illuminated how collaborative leadership and communication enhanced the application of these mechanisms. Based on the integrated results, a contextualized framework for improving transparency and accountability was proposed, tailored to the needs and dynamics of Sibonga Community College. This study highlights the importance of adaptive, relationship-based governance models in educational institutions and offers evidence-based strategies for fostering organizational trust, effectiveness, and compliance.



References:

  1. Adnan, H., Hashim, N., Mohd, N., & Ahmad, N. (2012). Ethical issues in the construction industry: Contractor’s perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.141
  2. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2021). Avoiding a “me” versus “we” dilemma: Using performance management to turn teams into a source of competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 64(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.09.005
  3. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  4. Arjoon, S., Turriago-Hoyos, A., & Thoene, U. (2018). Virtuousness and the common good as a conceptual framework for harmonizing the goals of the individual, organizations, and the economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2969-6
  5. Australian National Audit Office. (2021). Annual report 2020-2021. Commonwealth of Australia.
  6. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  7. Bhave, D. P., Teo, L. H., & Dalal, R. S. (2020). Privacy at work: A review and a research agenda for a contested terrain. Journal of Management, 46(1), 127–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319878254
  8. Bose, S., & Chandra, A. (2022). Accountability mechanisms and performance evaluation in higher education. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2020-0169
  9. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  10. Bovens, M. (2014). Public accountability: A framework for the analysis and assessment of accountability arrangements in the public domain. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
  13. Bryk, A., Gomez, L., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2021). Improvement science: A framework for enhancing educational outcomes. Harvard Education Press.
  14. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
  15. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  16. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  17. Cruz, M. (2020). Transparency and accountability in Philippine local governance: Challenges and prospects. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 56–78.
  18. DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2023). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001034
  19. Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., & Ribot, S. (2015). The integrated reporting movement: Meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  21. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
  22. Gilley, A., Gilley, J. W., & McMillan, H. S. (2019). Organizational change: Motivation, communication, and leadership effectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 32(3), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21296
  23. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years: Applying a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  24. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208
  25. Gupta, S., & Sao, D. (2022). Clarity in policy and procedures: Impact on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 989–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12693
  26. Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6, 4779–4874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4412(07)06070-9
  27. Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007
  28. Järvinen, J., Lamberg, J. A., Murmann, J. P., & Ojala, J. (2020). Alternative paths to competitive advantage: A fuzzy-set analysis of the origins of large firms. Industry and Innovation, 27(7), 744–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1732954
  29. Jennings, M. (2006). The seven signs of ethical collapse: How to spot moral meltdowns in companies before it’s too late. St. Martin’s Press.
  30. Junginger, J., & Schaffer, B. (2022). Governance and leadership: Assessing accountability mechanisms in higher education. Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEM-06-2020-0205
  31. Khoury, G. (2017). Organizational trust and transparency: Factors influencing ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2902-0
  32. Krishnamurthy, M. (2015). (White) tyranny and the democratic value of distrust. The Monist, 98(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onu015
  33. Lee, C., & Tinsley, C. H. (1989). The effect of procedural and distributive justice on perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10(4), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030100407
  34. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
  35. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  36. Menzel, D. C. (2016). Ethics management for public administrators: Building organizations of integrity (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  37. Miller, T. (2019). Transparency and accountability in public sector management: Challenges and opportunities. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13179
  38. Miller, T., & Choi, S. (2019). Barriers to transparency and accountability in public institutions: A comparative analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy073
  39. Mujani, S. (2019). Explaining the dynamics of corruption in Indonesia: An analysis of political and economic factors. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12460
  40. OECD. (2019). OECD public integrity handbook. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264297060-en
  41. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge.
  42. Petersen, K., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2021). Trust and accountability in digital governance: Impact on organizational performance. MIS Quarterly, 45(2), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15460
  43. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
  44. Quah, J. S. T. (2018). Why Singapore’s anti-corruption strategy works: An analysis of Singapore’s success in combating corruption. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2017-0066
  45. Reade, C., & Lee, H. J. (2022). Organizational transparency and employee well-being: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(8), 1575–1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1743486
  46. Republic Act No. 9485, Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007, 103rd Congress (Philippines). http://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2007/06/02/republic-act-no-9485/
  47. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  48. Sahoo, S., & Patnaik, B. C. (2016). Implementation of right to information act: Issues and challenges in India. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.1003382
  49. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  50. Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
  51. Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784–1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
  52. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
  53. Sison, A. J. (2017). Corruption and anticorruption in the Philippines: The case for virtue ethics. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0077-7
  54. Soh, D. S., & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2022). Internal audit function quality and financial reporting: Results of a survey of Australian public listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(1), 148–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-10-2020-2897
  55. Tannenbaum, S., & Bero, L. (2015). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.345.6203.1502
  56. Tjosvold, D. (2006). Defining conflict and making choices about its management: Lighting the dark side of organizational life. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060610736585
  57. Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (7th ed.). Wiley.
  58. Williams, J., & Smith, T. (2020). Building capacity for transparency and accountability: Training approaches and outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Education, 26(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911263.2020.1726350
  59. Xu, H. (2020). Government transparency in China: Evolution, challenges and prospects. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 25(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09646-6.
  60. Zafar, H., & Nawaz, M. (2021). Impact of disciplinary measures on organizational productivity: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Development Review, 20(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320982960

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic