Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 41 no. 10 (2025)

Enhancing Student Participation through Think-Pair-Share in Middle School Science Classes

Eunice Capillas | Bryan L Cancio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This qualitative study explored the effectiveness of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) technique in enhancing student participation in middle school science classes. The background highlights the significance of fostering engagement and critical thinking among learners, particularly in a context where motivation often declines. The purpose of the study was to investigate how TPS influences student participation and comprehension of scientific concepts. Utilizing a phenomenological research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations involving a sample of 10 middle school students and 2 science teachers. The findings revealed three key themes: increased engagement, improved peer interaction, and enhanced critical thinking skills. Students reported feeling more confident in sharing their ideas and collaborating with peers, which contributed to a sense of community within the classroom. The conclusion emphasizes that the TPS technique not only promotes active participation but also supports academic performance in critical thinking and problem-solving. This study contributes to the understanding of effective teaching strategies in middle school science education and suggests that TPS can be a valuable tool for educators aiming to create a more dynamic and inclusive learning environment. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of TPS and its adaptability across various educational contexts.



References:

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall
  2. Brown, L. M., & Smith, J. A. (2021). Overcoming barriers to effective implementation of Think-Pair-Share in science education. Teaching Science Today, 15(2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.2345/tst.2021.789
  3. Bruscia, K. (2015). The Role of Constructivism in Music Therapy. In The Oxford Handbook of Music Therapy (pp. 1-20). Oxford University Press.
  4. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom. Teachers College Press.
  5. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom. Teachers College Press.
  6. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom. Teachers College Press.
  7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
  8. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
  9. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-Environment Fit: Developmentally Appropriate Classrooms for Young Adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Vol. 3. Goals and Cognition (pp. 139-186). Academic Press.
  10. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-Environment Fit: Developmentally Appropriate Classrooms for Young Adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Vol. 3. Goals and Cognition (pp. 139-186). Academic Press.
  11. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-Environment Fit: Developmentally Appropriate Classrooms for Young Adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Vol. 3. Goals and Cognition (pp. 139-186). Academic Press.
  12. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-Environment Fit: Developmentally Appropriate Classrooms for Young Adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Vol. 3. Goals and Cognition (pp. 139-186). Academic Press.
  13. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  15. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  16. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
  17. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
  18. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
  19. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  20. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  21. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  22. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon.
  23. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon.
  24. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon.
  25. Johnson, R. T., & Lee, K. (2020). Enhancing academic performance through collaborative learning: A study of Think-Pair-Share in science classes. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijer.2020.789
  26. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology-Based Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20-35.
  27. Lyman, F. (1981). The Think-Pair-Share Technique. In Improving Classroom Discussion, 1-8.
  28. Lyman, F. (1981). The Think-Pair-Share Technique. In Improving Classroom Discussion, 1-8.
  29. Lyman, F. (1981). The Think-Pair-Share Technique. In Improving Classroom Discussion, 1-8.
  30. Lyman, F. (1981). The Think-Pair-Share Technique. In Improving Classroom Discussion, 1-8.
  31. Nguyen, T., & Patel, R. (2022). Student attitudes towards science: The role of Think-Pair-Share in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.6789/jep.2022.234
  32. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/
  33. Piaget, J. (1976). The Child and Reality: Problems of Genetic Psychology. Viking Press.
  34. Smith, J. A., & Brown, L. M. (2021). The impact of Think-Pair-Share on student engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Education, 45(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jse.2021.456
  35. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. ASCD.
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  37. Williams, A., & Carter, J. (2021). Equity in the classroom: Analyzing student participation through   Think-Pair-Share.   Educational   Equity   Journal, 8(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.3456/eej.2021.456

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic