Home⇛DAVAO RESEARCH JOURNAL⇛vol. 15 no. 3 (2024)

Geographic information system-based prioritization mapping for urban search and rescue in Poblacion, Davao City

Filmore D. Masancay | Yanna Jane F. Comendador | JJ Allind L. Dizon | Leila Philline L. Jallores

Discipline: others in geographical studies

 

Abstract:

Reading Natural catastrophes frequently have substantial consequences, such as infrastructure damage and loss of life. These unanticipated circumstances often result in trapped individuals under rubble debris that needs rapid response and attention. Natural catastrophes can cause a large number of victims, and so a crisis might destabilize the entire area if the authorities’ Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) operations are ineffective. Prioritization maps are a highly valuable tool in this approach since they may improve and automate the “decision-making” process by showing the most critical regions. This study creates prioritization maps based on population density per barangay and the population of the declared employees in the barangay to identify and prioritize the most critical areas before and after a catastrophe. These maps reflect heavily populated locations using population density metrics, showing areas with potentially more significant concentrations of people needing help after catastrophic occurrences. When a disaster happens, the USAR personnel, using these prioritization maps, can make informed decisions to allocate resources and manpower effectively. Utilizing these maps will contribute to and ensure an effective and immediate response, resulting in fewer casualties and damage. Population data is processed using Geographic Information Systems to produce these maps. The methodology was applied to the Poblacion District of Davao City, Philippines, and prioritization maps were developed. The maps reflected critical areas of the district and will serve as valuable tools for planning and effectively dispatching USAR personnel in times of a natural catastrophe.



References:

  1. Alamari, A. A., Alsalem, M. F., Alzahrani, F. S., Alhooti, A. N., Almuhayzi, H. N., Elfouhil, A. F., and Alwadani, S. F. (2020). Awareness and knowledge of ophthalmic emergencies among Saudi visitors of outpatient clinics at KKUH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. https://doi.org/10.24911/IJMDC.51-1580313243
  2. Ahmadi, G., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Baboli, A., and Najafi, M. (2022). A decision support model for robust allocation and routing of search and rescue resources after earthquake: a case study. Operational Research, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00591-5
  3. Alexander, D. (2000). Confronting Catastrophe: New Perspectives on Natural Disasters. Oxford University Press.
  4. Chenji, H., Zhang, W., Won, M., Stoleru, R., and Arnett, C. (2012). A wireless system for reducing response time in Urban Search and Rescue. 2012 IEEE 31st International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC). https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.2012.6407756
  5. Cooper, D. C. (Ed.) (2005). Fundamentals of search and rescue. Jones and Bartlett Learning.
  6. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., and Shirley, W. L. (2012). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
  7. Erden, T., and Coşkun, M. Z. (2010). Multi-criteria site selection for fire services: the interaction with analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10(10), 2127–2134. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-2127-2010.
  8. Hanssen, Ø. (2018). Position tracking and GIS in search and rescue operations. In Crisis Management-Theory and Practice. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75371
  9. Hassanzadeh, R., and Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2016). Where to go first: prioritization of damaged areas for allocation of Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) operations (PI-USAR model). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(4), 1337–1366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1058861
  10. Lindell, M. K. (2020). Improving hazard map comprehension for protective action decision making. Frontiers in Computer Science, 2, 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00027
  11. Lindell, M. K. (2021). Emergency Management: Evacuations. In Encyclopedia of Security and Emergency Management (pp. 272-286). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_106-1
  12. Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/5782
  13. Nasar, W., Da Silva Torres, R., Gundersen, O. E., and Karlsen, A. T. (2023). The Use of Decision Support in Search and Rescue: A Systematic Literature Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(5), 182. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12050182
  14. Nefros, K. C., Kitsara, G. S., and Photis, Y. N. (2018). Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to develop prioritization maps in urban search and rescue operations, after a natural disaster. Case study: the municipality of Agia Paraskevi, Athens, Greece. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(30), 360–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.332
  15. Perry, R. W., and Lindell, M. K. (2003). Preparedness for Emergency Response: Guidelines for the Emergency Planning Process. Disasters, 27(4), 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x
  16. Smith, K. (2013). Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351261647
  17. Statheropoulos, M., Agapiou, A., Pallis, G. C., Mikedi, K., Karma, S., Vamvakari, J., and Thomas, C. P. (2015). Factors that affect rescue time in urban search and rescue (USAR) operations. Natural Hazards, 75, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1304-3
  18. Sushma, J. P. (2013). Shortest Path Algorithms Techniques. Internasional Journal of Science and Modern Engineering, 1(10), 8-12.
  19. Tierney, K. (2003). Disaster beliefs and institutional interests: Recycling disaster myths in the aftermath of 9–11. In Terrorism and disaster: New threats, new ideas (Vol. 11, pp. 33-51). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(03)11004-6

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic