HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 30 no. 1 (2008)

Appropriation of the information andcommunication technologies by farmers andextension workers in Borongan, Eastern Samar

Ulderico B. Alviola | Editha G. Cagasan

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to describe how the information and communications technologies (ICTs) are being appropriated or adapted by farmers and extension workers to fit their day-to-day activities and to find out the consequences of using ICTs from the point of view of farmers and extension workers. This study followed a qualitative case study design. Informants were identified using the snowball sampling technique. A total of 23 informants were interviewed, 13 of which were farmers and 10 were extension workers. Data were gathered using in-depth and unstructured interviews. The grounded theory analysis was used to generate a model that describes how ICTs are appropriated by farmers and extension workers in Borongan, Eastern Samar. As shown by the model, the primary intentions for using ICTs were not agriculture-related. But because of certain facilitating factors, ICT use was later modified to fit the needs and lifestyle of farmers and extension workers. Their use of ICTs for agricultural purposes led to the following consequences: 1) savings in money and time; 2) fast access to information and instant communication; 3) convenience; 4) increased knowledge; 5) easier and faster accomplishment of job; 6) improved livelihood; 7) lessening of worries, dismay and embarassment; 8) increased demand for information and technical assistance from clients and 8) people’s increased interest to learn.



References:

  1. ALAMPAY E., R. HEEKS and P.P. SOLIVA. 2003. Bridging the information divide: A Philippine guidebook on ICTs. University of the Philippines Press, Quezon City, Philippines.
  2. CRESWELL, J. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  3. DE MUNSTER, I. 2004. The digital divide in Latin America: A case study. Proceedings of the World Library and Information Congress: 70th IFLA General Conference and Council. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  4. ENCYCLOPEDIA. Microsoft Encarta 2006 [CD-ROM]. Microsoft Corporation, 2005, Redmond, WA.
  5. GIDDENS, A. 1984. The constitution of society: The theory of structuration. Retrieved January 2, 2007 from the http//:www.theory.org.uk/giddens2. Htm.
  6. ICT for Development. 2003. SDC project examples in ICT4D. Retrieved September 01, 2006 from http//:www.ictfordevelopment.wordpress.com/tag/agriculture.
  7. LOFLAND J. & L. LOFLAND (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth Publishing, NM.
  8. MICHIELS, S.I. and V. L. CROWDER. 2002. Discovering the magic box: Local appropriation of Information and communications technologies (ICTs). FAO Press, Rome.
  9. PATTON, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  10. PCARRD, 2006. Techno Gabay Program. Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research and Development (PCARRD). Department of Science and Technology. PCARRD Information Bulletin No. 134A/2006.
  11. STRAUSS, A. and J. CORBIN. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  12. The OSCAR Project. 2006. An exercise in ICT, agriculture and society. Retrieved July 22, 2006 from http//:www.i4donline.net.