HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 30 no. 2 (2008)

Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration inpurple food yam (Dioscorea alata L.)

Marilyn M. Belarmino | Jocelyn R. Gonzales

 

Abstract:

A study was conducted to (1) evaluate the maintainer and restorer lines of Mestizo hybrids for resistance to Philippine Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) races; (2) incorporate bacterial blight resistance genes into these lines via marker-aided backcrossing; and (3) confirm the presence of introgressed Xa genes in the progeny of each backcross generation through phenotyping and molecular marker analysis. Mestizo hybrids, their maintainer and restorer lines, the IRBB62 donor, and check varieties were inoculated with ten Xoo races (12 isolates). Marker-aided backcrossing from the IRBB62 donor (carrying Xa4, Xa7, and Xa21) to each line was conducted to introgress the target genes. Resistance in the advanced lines was confirmed using diagnostic Xoo races and analysis of linked DNA markers. Mestizo 1, 2, and 3, along with their maintainer and restorer lines (IR68888B, IR68897B, IR34686R, IR62161R, IR60819R)—except IR58025B—were similar to IRBB4, indicating the presence of the Xa4 resistance gene. However, these lines did not contain the Xa7 and Xa21 genes. Resistance genes Xa7 and Xa21, in addition to Xa4, were successfully incorporated into BC5F2 progeny (BC5F3 seeds) of IR34686-179-1-2-1R, IR60819-34-2R, IR62161-184-3-1-3-2R, and IR6888B. These genes were also incorporated into BC4F1 progeny (BC4F2 seeds) of IR58025B and IR68897B. The presence of the resistance genes was confirmed through analysis using linked molecular markers. Lines carrying gene pyramids exhibited increased resistance to bacterial blight and a broader resistance spectrum to Xoo races. The advanced backcross progeny were phenotypically similar to their recurrent B and R parent lines.



References:

  1. FAUTHERET, A., P. DUBLIN and P. CHAGVARDIEFF. 1985, Callus formation and neoformation with two edible Dioscorea species: D. alata and D. trifida (pp 624-632). Proc. 7th Symp. Intl. Soc. Trop. Root Crops, INRA, Guadaloupe.
  2. GEORGE, E.F. and P.D. SHERINGTON. 1984. Plant propagation by tissue culture. Reading, Berks Eastern Press.
  3. MURASHIGE, T. and F. SKOOG 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-492
  4. OSIFO, E. O. 1988. Somatic embryogenesis in Dioscorea. Plant Physiol. 133:378-380
  5. PETREVICA, L. 2004. Micropropagation in horticultural and tropical plant production. Pure State Horticultural Research Station Tukuma r.; LV-3124; LATVIA. IITA Crops and Farming Systems
  6. SALEIL, V., L. DEGRAS and R. JONARD. 1990. Obtention de plantes indemnes du virus de la mosaïque de l’igname (YMV) par culture in vitro des apex chez l’igname americaine Dioscorea trifida L. Agronomie, 10: 605-615.
  7. SHU, Y., Y. YING-CAI and L. HONG-HUI. 2005. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from callus cultures of Dioscorea zingiberensis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 80(2): 157-161(5)
  8. TAJI, A. and R. WILLIAMS. 1996. Tissue culture of Australian plants. Armidale, NSW: University of England
  9. THOMAS, P. and M. B. RAVINDRA. 1997. Effects of pruning or removal of in vitro formed roots on ex vitro regeneration and growth in micropropagated grapes. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., Dordrecht, 51(3): 177-180
  10. TORRES, K.C. 1989. Tissue culture techniques for horticultural crops. AVI Books, New. York
  11. TWYFORD, C. T. and S. H. MANTELL. 1996. Production of somatic embryos and plantlets from root cells of the Greater Yam. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 46: 17-26
  12. VIANA, A. M. and S. H. MANTELL. 1989. Callus induction and plant regeneration from excised zygotic embryos of the seed-propagated yams Dioscorea composita Hemsl. and D. cayenensis Lam. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 6(2):113-122
  13. WAEZ, V. J. 1987. The effect of activated charcoal on in vitro propagation of eestern European orchids. Acta. Horticulture. 1: 131-138.