HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 32 no. 1 (2010)

Floral biology of Jatropha curcas L.

Angelo Jay M. Noriel | Othello B. Capuno

 

Abstract:

This study was conducted at the existing plantation of Jatropha curcas within the campus of Visayas State University, Visca, Baybay, Leyte from April 2006 to June 2006 with the following objectives: 1) to study the floral morphology and flowering behavior of J. curcas; 2) to determine the time and duration of flower opening, anther dehiscence, and stigmatic receptivity of J. curcas; and 3) to test for pollen viability. Male and female flowers of J. curcas were borne on the same plant with an average numbers per inflorescence of 55.03 and 1.926, respectively. Male flowers were more numerous than the females without definite relationship on number per inflorescence. It took an average of 9.56 days for all florets to full bloom. Anther dehiscence was observed to start at the time of opening of male flowers at around 0500 to 0600 hours and remained so for 24 to 72 hours. Stigmatic receptivity started about 1- 2 hours after full bloom and lasted for about 24 hours. Based on observations, opening of floret buds, anther dehiscence, and stigmatic receptivity were all greatly influenced by the environment. Early sunrise, longer sunshine duration, and less amount of rainfall enhanced flowering of J. curcas. Pollen viability was relatively high, ranging from 88.12% to 98.55%.



References:

  1. BHATTACHARYA, A., K. DATTA and S. K. DATTA. 2005. Floral Biology, Floral Resource Constraints and Pollination Limitation in Jatropha curcas L. Pakistan Jour. of Biol. Sci., 8 (3): 456-460.
  2. DEHGAN, B. and G. L. WEBSTER. 1979. Morphology and infragenic relationships of the genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). Univ. of Calif. Publ. in Botany Vol. 74.
  3. DUKE, J. A. and K. K. WAIN. 1981. Medicinal plants of the world. Computer index with more than 85,000 entries. 3 vol. www.hort.purdue.edu, accessed: January, 2007
  4. ECOPORT.ORG. accessed: January, 2007
  5. GRIMM, C., 1999. Evaluation of damage to physic nut (Jatropha curcas) by tree bugs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92:127-136.
  6. HELLER, J. 1996. Physic nut. Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
  7. JEPSEN, J. K., R. K. HENNING and B. NYATHI. 2003. Generative propagation of Jatropha curcas L. on Kalahari Sand. www.jatropha.com, accessed: January, 2007.
  8. JOKER, D. and J. JEPSEN. 2003. Jatropha curcas L. Seed Leaflet No. 83 August 2003. Danida Forest Seed Centre. Denmark.
  9. MAKKAR, H. P. S., K. BECKER and B. SCHMOOK. 2001. Edible provenances of Jatropha curcas from Quintna Roo State of Mexico and effect of roasting on antinutrient and toxic factors in seeds. Institute for Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics (480), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
  10. NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUTHORITY. 1982 Guidebook on the Proper Use of Medicinal Plants. NSTA. Bicutan, Taguig, Metro Manila. 142pp.
  11. netfiles.uiuc.edu, accessed: January, 2007.
  12. NORIEL, L. M., E.A. VASQUEZ, F. M. Y. DUATIN and G. O. SOPSOP. 1998. Ethnobotanical knowledge of farmers in Baybay, Leyte. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Applied Tropoical Ecology. Sept. 8-10,1998, Visca, Baybay, Leyte. 268-277.
  13. ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION. 1998. The potential of Jatropha curcas in rural development and environment protection- An Exploration. Concept paper. Rockefeller Foundation and Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe 1998.
  14. WATT, J. M. AND M. G. BREYER-BRANDWIJK. 1962. The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. (2nd ed). E&S. Livingstone, Ltd, Edinburgh and London. www.hort.purdue.edu, accessed: January, 2007.