HomeThe PCMC Journalvol. 15 no. 1 (2019)

A Study on the accuracy of pen click test as a hearing screening tool among newborns seen in two tertiary government hospitals

Genevieve A Abuan | Aileen Grace T. Membrere | Michael M. Resurreccion

Discipline: medicine by specialism

 

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Hearing impairment has a great impact on the functional, social and emotional aspects of a child. Thus, early detection and management is crucial for optimal development of the child. The Newborn Hearing Screening Act was approved in the Philippines to ?institutionalize measures for prevention and early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss among newborns?. A simple, accurate and readily available hearing screening tool is necessary in less privileged communities. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of Pen Click Test as compared to otoacoustic emission test as a hearing screening tool among newborns seen in two tertiary government hospitals. The accuracy of Pen Click Test was measured for its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. METHODS: The study is an experimental design consisting of three phases: Phase I is a randomized complete block design; Phase II involves inter-rater and intra-rater variability randomized block design and Phase III is a cross sectional design. The study was done in two government tertiary hospitals. The subjects are term newborns with both ears analyzed independently from each other. RESULTS: Phase I of the study identified Acroball retractable pen as the study stimulus based on its accessibility and its capability to produce high decibel. In phase II, all health workers produced a sound stimulus of more than 70 decibels. Majority of the health workers had no significant difference among each other which means there is minimal deviation from the mean. Phase III showed that pen click test has a high specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 43%. Based on disease prevalence, the test showed a positive predictive value of 77% and negative predictive value of 93%. Kappa agreement showed moderate result with a Kappa coefficient of 0.54. CONCLUSION: The study showed high specificity in identifying hearing impairment and a positive association of Pen Click test to the standard hearing audiometer. The application of this test in the community may be done as a hearing screening tool. This study provides an accessible, easily reproducible and accurate tool for hearing screening that may be applied in communities without facilities.



References:

  1. World Health Organization. Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening: Current Issues and Guiding Principles for Action. 2010:7–23.
  2. Better Hearing Philippines. Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in the Philippines. Retrieved from http://bhphil.org/downloads/prevalence_of_ear.pdf
  3. Ptok M. Early detection of hearing impairment in newborns and infants. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108(25):426–431.
  4. Naeem Z, Newton V. Prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in Asian children. 1996; 30(5):332–339.
  5. Gloria-Cruz T, Abes G, Abes F. The voice test for newborn hearing screening. Acta Med Philipp 2012; 46(3):46–51.
  6. Pirozzo S, Papinczak T, Glasziou P. Whispered voice test for screening for hearing impairment in adults and children: systematic review. BMJ 2003; 327:967.
  7. Garcia M, Chiong C, Abes G, Carrillo R. Accuracy of reflexive behavioral (“Baah”) test in the screening for hearing impairment in infants six months old and below. Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 27(1):6–11.
  8. Subroto O, et al. A simple ballpen click as a tool for screening of hearing impairment in Filipino school children in Metro Manila. Philipp J Pediatr 1995; 44(4):249–252.
  9. Bossuyt PM, Retisma JB, Bruns DE. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. 2003; 49:7–18.
  10. Wong HB, Lim GH. Measures of diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. 2011; 20(4):316–318.
  11. Wrightson P, Stevens J. Universal newborn hearing screening. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(9):1349–1352.
  12. Republic Act 9709. Republic of the Philippines, Fourteenth Congress, Second Regular Session, Metro Manila. Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines.
  13. Sedighi I. Interpretation of diagnostic tests: likelihood ratio vs predictive value. Kowsar Med Inst 2013; 23(6):717.
  14. McHugh M. Interrater reliability: the Kappa statistic. Biochem Med 2012; 22(3):276–282.