HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 28 no. 2 (2006)

Effects of in vitro and in vivo induction of polyethelene glycol-mediated osmotic stress on hybrid taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott)

Manas Ranjan Sahoo | Madhumita DasGupta | Archana Mukherjee

 

Abstract:

M. R., M. DasGupta and A. Mukherjee. 2006. Effect of in vitro and in vivo induction of polyethelene glycol-mediated osmotic stress on hybrid taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Ann. Trap. Res. 28(2):1-11.



References:

  1. ΑΕΒΙ, Η. Ε. 1983. In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (H. U. Bergmeyer, J. Bergmeyer and M. Bl. Gra, eds.) 3rd Ed. Vol. 3. VCH, Weinheim, New York. 273-286 pp.
  2. BARRS, H. C. and P. E. WEATHERLEY. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Biological Sciences. 15:413-428.
  3. BIRADAR, R. S., T. VENKATESWARLU and N. HIRISH. 1978. Leaf area estimation in Colocasia. Root Crops. 4:51-53.
  4. BOYER, J. S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science. 218:443-448.
  5. INDIRA, P. and S. KABEERATHUMMA. 1988. Physiological response of sweet potato under water stress: 1. Effect of water stress during different phases of tuberization. Root Crops. 14:47-50.
  6. JACOMINI, E., A. BERTANI and S. MAPELLI. 1988. Accumulation of PEG-6000 and its effects on water content and carbohydrate level in water stressed tomato plants. Canadian J. Bot. 66:970-973.
  7. KAR, M., and J. FEIERABEND. 1984. Changes in the activities of the enzymes involved in amino acid metabolism during the senescence of detached wheat leaves. Physiol. Plant. 62:39-44.
  8. KOLEYOREAS, S. A. 1958. A new method for determining drought resistance. Plant Physiol. 3:22.
  9. MAHADEVAN, A. and R. SRIDHAR. 1996. Enzymes of infected plants and of parasites. In: Methods in Physiological Plant Pathology. Sivakami Publications, Chennai. 32 pp.
  10. MUKHERJEE, A., B. K. DEBATA and S. K. NASKAR. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and chromosomal ability of regenerants in sweet potato and taro. J. Scientific and Industrial Research. 57:709-715.
  11. MURASHIGE, T. and F. SKOOG. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497.
  12. NG, S. Y. C. and I. J. EKANAYAKE. 1997. Screening cassava (Monihot esculenta Crantz) for polyehtelene glycol-mediated osmotic stress in vitro. J. Root Crops. 23(1):15-18.
  13. RAVI, V. and S. R. CHOWDHURY. 1997. Physiological response of taro to different soil moisture regimes. Root Crops. 17:129-133.
  14. SAHOO, M. R., S. SAHU, A. MUKHERJEE, S. K. NASKAR and R. MISRA. 2002. In vitro screening of taro genetic resources for tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In: Plant Resources Utilization (S. Sahoo, D. B. Ramesh, P. K. Panda and V. N. Misra, eds.) Allied Publishers, New delhi. 217-223 pp.
  15. SULLIVAN, C. Y. Techniques for measuring plant drought stress. In: Drought Injury and resistance in crops (K. L. Larson and J. D. Eastin, eds.) Crop Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin.
  16. WILSON, J. E. 1984. Cocoyam. In: The Physiology of tropical field crops (Goldworthy P. R. and N. M. Fisher, eds.) John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 589-604 pp.