HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 11 no. 1 (1989)

An Analysis Of Interagency Coordination Among Government Organizations: A Case Study Of The Nutrition Program In Leyte

Myrna M. Avila

 

Abstract:

The study involved 14 respondents composed of five regional directors, four provincial heads/incharge, and five municipal level community workers Coordination among government organizations was maintained by in. terorganizational linkages (administrativeand direct service linkages). These linkages were manifested through resource exchange/sharing,information exchange, joint activities/programs, written agreement, referrals, follow-up and outreach activities. Coordination dynamics was further manifested by personal interaction during regular meetings, democratic decision-making process, mutual concern and continuous dialogue and involvement of private agencies. Coordination was influenced by domain consensus, resource scarcity, lack of alternative resources, frequency of interaction, leadership of coordinator, and directives such as Executive Orders 121 and 285, and Presidential Decree 491 (National Nutrition Council). Generally, the coordination machinery of the existing Nutrition Program Committee is weak and handicapped by the lack of control over the participating agencies. Formal authority is loosely exercised and each member is not under the authority of the lead agency.



References:

  1. ALKEN, M. and HAGE, J. 1968. Organizational interdependence and interor-ganizational structure. Amer. Sociological Rev. 3(12):912-930.
  2. JAISWAL, N. 1977. Coordination in agricultural development programmes. Behavioral Sci. Community Dev. 11(1):25.
  3. KLONGLAN, G.E. 1976. Theory and practice of interorganizational relations. Iowa State University: Sociology Department. Mimeographed.
  4. LEVINE, S. and WHITE, P. 1960. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Sci. Quarterly 5(3):585-601.
  5. NUÑEZ, D.R. and MANALILI, A. 1982. Complementation and integration of rural development program. Mimeographed.
  6. SEBRING, R. 1977. The five-million dollar misunderstanding: A perspective on the state-government-university interorganizational conflicts. Administra-tive Sci. Quarterly 22:565-574..
  7. TEAD, W. 1951. Interagency coordination in delinquency prevention and control. Social Sci. Rev. 38(12):418-428.