HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 6 no. 1 (1986)

Intercropping Sweet Potato With Legumes As A Cultural Management System

Bernardita F. Quirol | Rodolfo G. Escalada | Fe A. Manatad

 

Abstract:

The use of legume intercrops reduced the overall growth of sweet potato. The yield of sweet potato declined by as much as 17.78% while that of the legumes by 14.94% due to competition for nutrients and light between the main crop and the intercrops. However, inoculation of the legume intercrops with Rhizobium minimized the competition for nitrogen and allowed the sweet potato to develop enough herbage. Sweet potato intercropped with inoculated legumes produced root yield which was 6.5% higher than that intercropped with uninoculated legumes. Significant differences were observed on the effects of legume intercrops and their interaction with inoculation on sweet potato productivity. Bushbean was a better intercrop than either mungbean or soybean because this legume matures earlier than the other two. Bushbean and mungbean increased sweet potato yield upon inoculation but inoculated soybean seemed to depress the yield of the root crop. In general, inoculation of the legume intercrops and intercropping were more beneficial and profitable. Intercropping was 4 and 3.5 times more profitable than monoculture when the legumes were inoculated and uninoculated, respectively.



References:

  1. ALCANTARA, A. J. 1973. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation by legumes IRRI Sat. Seminar. Sept. 8, 1973.32 pp.
  2. ALEXANDER, M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 467 pp.
  3. DALAL, R. C. 1974. Effects of intercropping maize with pigeon pea on grain yield and nutrient uptake. Exptl. Agric. 10:219-224.
  4. KANG, B. T. 1975. Effects of inoculation and nitrogen fertilizer on soy. bean in Western Nigeria. Exptl. Agric. 11:23-31.
  5. MOODY, K. 1981. Weed-fertilizer interaction in rice. IRPS No. 68, IRRI, Los Banos, Laguna. p. 3
  6. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 1979a. Microbial Processes: Promising Technologies for Developing Countries. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. p. 65.
  7. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 1979b. Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. p. 5.
  8. PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RESOURCES RE-SEARCH. 1976. The Philippines recommends for integrated far-ming systems. Los Banos, Laguna. p. 12.
  9. RITAGA, I. A., ESCALADA, R. G. and ALMENDRAS, A. S. 1980. Growth and yield of soybean as affected by inoculation with strains of R. japonicum. Ann. Trop. Res. 2(4): 206-212.
  10. TISDALE, S. L. and NELSON, W. L. 1975. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 3rd ed. MacMillan Publ. Co., Inc., New York. 694 pp.
  11. VILLAMAYOR, F. G. 1982. Root crops production in the Philippines. Paper presented during the National Symposium/Workshop on Root Crops Research and Development, 21-23 Oct. 1982. VISCA, Bay-bay, Leyte. 23 pp.