HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 5 no. 2 (1983)

Effects Of Flooding On Seven Species Of Tropical Pasture Legumes

Reynaldo R. Javier

 

Abstract:

Seven tropical pasture legume species were grown in pots inside the glasshouse. At the start of flowering stage, plants were continuously flooded to 5 cm above the soil surface for 10 and 21 days. Dry weights of shoots, roots and nodules of the flooded plants were compared to the corresponding unflooded plants after a recovery period of 7 days. Macroptilium lathyroides exhibited superior tolerance to flooding while Cassia rotundifolia and Vigna parkeri showed very poor tolerance. Root growth was more affected by flooding than shoot growth. Nodulation was reduced in all species except in M. lathyroides. The adaptation of ?. lathyroides, Desmodium heterophyllum, Lotononis bainesii and Trifolium semipilosum to flooding was related to the rapid production of adventitious roots from the immersed stems and branches and to the rapid nodulation of these adventitious roots and the original roots. High stomatal conductance was maintained in flood-tolerant species with increased duration of flooding while high leaf diffusive resistance was common in species intolerant to flooding.



References:

  1. BERGERSEN, F.J. 1971. Biochemistry of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in le-gumes. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 22:121-128.
  2. CHUDASAMA, Α.Κ. 1981. Effect of flooding on five species of pasture le-gumes. Unpubl. M.S. Thesis. Univ. Queensland. pp. 1-47.
  3. CURRIE, J.A. 1962. The importance of aeration in providing right conditions for plant growth. J. Sci. Food Agric. 13:380-387.
  4. FRANCIS, C.M. and POOLE, M.L. 1973. Effect of waterlogging on the growth of annual Medicago species. Australian J. Exp. Agric. An. Husb. 13:711-716.
  5. GLINKA, Z. and REINHOLDS, L. 1962. Rapid changes in permeability of cell membranes to water brought about by carbon dioxide and oxygen. Plant Physiol. 37:481-486.
  6. HEINRICHS, D.H. 1970. Flooding tolerance of legumes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50: 435-438.
  7. JACKSON, W.T. 1955. The role of adventitious roots in recovery of shoots, fol-lowing flooding on the original root system. Amer. J. Bot. 20:816-819.
  8. JONES, R. 1972. Comparative studies on plant growth and distribution in rela-tion to waterlogging. V. The uptake of Fe and Mo by dune plants. J. Ecol. 60:131-138.
  9. KRAMER, P.J. 1951. Causes of injury to plant resulting from flooding of the soil. Plant Physiol. 26:722-736.
  10. McIVOR, J.G. 1976. The effect of waterlogging on the growth of Stylosanthes guianensis. Trop. Grassland 10:173-178.
  11. MCKENZIE, R. 1951. The ability of forage plant to survive early spring flood-ing. Sci. Agric. 31:358-367.
  12. MCMANMON, M. and CRAWFORD, R.M.M. 1971. A metabolic theory of flooding tolerance, the significance of enzyme distribution and behaviour. New Phytol. 70:299-306.
  13. PERIERA, J.S. and KOZLOWSKI, T.T. 1977. Variation among angiosperms to flooding. Physiol. Plant. 41:184-192.
  14. SLATYER, R.D. 1967. Plant-Water Relationship. Academic Press. London.. p. 156.
  15. TROUGHT, M.C.T. and DREW, M.C. 1980. The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings. I. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in concentration of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil solution. Plant and Soil 54:77-94.
  16. WHITEMAN, P.C., SEITHLHICO, M. and SIREGAR, M. 1981. Comparative flooding tolerance of pasture legumes. Proc. XIV. Int. Grassland Congress. pp. 188-191.
  17. WILEY, C.R. 1970. Effects of short periods of anaerobic and near aerobic con-dition on water uptake by tobacco roots. Agron. J. 62:224-226.