HomeUniversal Journal of Educational Researchvol. 4 no. 3 (2025)

Growth Mindset Profiles Among Senior High School Students: Academic Achievement and Stress Analysis

Stephen Jay Co | Mary Grace DeLa Cruz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research utilized person-centered methodology to examine distinct configurations of growth mindset beliefs among Filipino senior high school students and examine their relationship with academic outcomes across different specializations, moving beyond traditional fixed-growth dichotomies. K-means clustering analysis was conducted with data from 1,043 Filipino senior high school students across four academic strands (STEM, ABM, HUMSS, GAS). Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of profile membership, while moderation analyses tested contextual effects of academic strand and sex on profile-outcome relationships. Three distinct profiles emerged: Fixed Mindset (24.3%), Moderate Growth (47.7%), and Strong Growth (28.1%). Strong Growth students demonstrated significantly higher academic achievement (M = 88.9 vs. 88.1-88.2, p < .05) and lower perceived stress (M = 23.6 vs. 24.9-25.6, p < .01) compared to other profiles. Academic strand and sex predicted profile membership, with strand moderating the mindset-stress relationship specifically in STEM contexts. Notably, Moderate Growth students did not differ significantly from Fixed Mindset students on either outcome, suggesting a threshold effect for mindset benefits. This study extends growth mindset theory by revealing complex configurations of intelligence beliefs that function differently across educational contexts. These results underscore the necessity of examining both mindset orientations and educational context when designing interventions, suggesting mindset effects are context-dependent. The substantial Moderate Growth group represents a critical target for tailored



References:

  1. Burnette, J. L., Knouse, L. E., Billingsley, J., Earl, S., Pollack, J., & Hoyt, C. L. (2022). A systematic review of growth mindset intervention implementation strategies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(2), e12723. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12723
  2. Calingasan, K. A., & Plata, S. (2022). Effects of effort praise on struggling Filipino ESL readers’ motivation and mindset. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 601-611. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.32898
  3. Chen, Z., Song, Y., Valentine, A., & Oliveira, E. A. (2024). Do beliefs about intelligence drive engagement in online learning? Exploring the impact of growth and fixed mindsets. ASCILITE Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2024.1421
  4. Co, S. (2025). Student evaluation of blended learning implementation and faculty performance in online components: A comparative analysis across senior high school grade levels and academic strands. International Journal on Open and Distance e-Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.58887/ijodel.v10i2.287
  5. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
  6. Deng, Y., Yuan, W., Zhang, L.-F., & Xie, Z. (2024). Profiles of attitudes toward inclusive education among Chinese in-service teachers: Their relationships with demographic factors and organizational commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1391862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391862
  7. Gazmuri, C. (2025). Can growth mindset interventions improve academic achievement? A structured review of the existing evidence. Review of Education, 13(2), e70066. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70066
  8. Ghafari, Z., Sanjari, E., Raeisi, S., & Raeisi, H. (2025). Clustering undergraduate students based on their self-esteem and academic achievement via the k-means approach. Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v10i4.18521
  9. Kassaw, C., Demareva, V., Negash, M., & Sime, Y. (2024). Psychosocial determinants of academic achievement in Ethiopian higher education students: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon, 10(17), e36465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36465
  10. Kroeper, K., Fried, A. C., & Murphy, M. C. (2022). Towards fostering growth mindset classrooms: Identifying teaching behaviors that signal instructors’ fixed and growth mindset beliefs to students. Social Psychology of Education, 25(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09689-4
  11. Kyler, E. N., & Moscicki, M. K. (2024). Measuring many mindsets: A systematic review of growth mindset domains, and discussion of domain relationships, with implications for growth mindset interventions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(11), e70015. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70015
  12. Laurell, J., Puusepp, I., Hakkarainen, K., & Tirri, K. (2025). Students’ cross-domain mindset profiles and academic achievement in Finnish lower-secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1514879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1514879
  13. Malespina, A., Schunn, C. D., & Singh, C. (2023). Bioscience students’ internalized mindsets predict grades and reveal gender inequities in physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020135. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020135
  14. Meyer, H. H., & Stutts, L. A. (2024). The effect of mindset interventions on stress and academic motivation in college students. Innovative Higher Education, 49(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09706-8
  15. Mohamoud, A. M. (2024). The impact of growth mindset interventions on students’ motivation, resilience, and academic achievement. Multidisciplinary Journal of Horseed International University, 2(1), 102-125. https://doi.org/10.59336/7adj0850
  16. Mosanya, M. (2021). Buffering academic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic related social isolation: Grit and growth mindset as protective factors against the impact of loneliness. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00043-7
  17. Repuya, C. R., & Esterninos, J. (2022). Enhancing mathematics learning by integrating growth mindset principles in ninth-grade supplementary materials. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 12(1), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v12i1.179
  18. Schel, J., & Drechsel, B. (2025). A latent profile analysis for teacher education students’ learning: An overview of competencies in self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1527438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1527438
  19. Selisko, T. J., Eckert, C., & Perels, F. (2024). The who and what of inclusive education—Profiles of student teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1433739. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1433739
  20. Sugiarti, S., Prihatini, A., Sari, A. P., & Zamahsari, G. K. (2024). Developing a growth mindset in education: A bibliometric analysis and its challenge during pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(3), 1455-1464. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26940
  21. Yazon, A. D., Manaig, K., & Adrian, T. W. C. (2021). A correlational study on mindset, grit, and adversity quotient of pre-service teachers: Evidence in Philippines and Hongkong. International Journal of Management Entrepreneurship Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v4i2.784
  22. Yeh, Y.-c., Ting, Y.-S., & Chiang, J.-L. (2023). Influences of growth mindset, fixed mindset, grit, and self-determination on self-efficacy in game-based creativity learning. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 62-78.
  23. Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., & Lin, D. (2023). Trajectories of perceived stress among students in transition to college: Mindset antecedents and adjustment outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(9), 1873-1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01788-5Zou, W., Ding, X., Xie, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Relationship between higher education teachers’ affect and their psychological adjustment to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: An application of latent profile analysis. PeerJ Life and Environment, 9(3), e12432. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12432