HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 42 no. 7 (2025)

Collaborative School Cultures and Co-Constructing Theory Perspective of School Heads in the City of Goodwill

Joevelyn Penuela | Nancy B. Espacio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the extent to which school heads in primary education foster collaborative school cultures and engage in co-constructing theory perspectives. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, the research utilized a researcher-modified survey questionnaire that focused on three key areas: demographic profile, leadership practices, and co-constructing theory perspectives. Data were gathered through complete enumeration of all elementary school heads within the division, and Pearson’s r correlation was used to assess the relationship between collaborative practices and theoretical perspectives. Findings reveal that school heads excel at fostering social interactions (mean = 4.47) and shared leadership (mean = 4.46), effectively promoting relationship building and participative decision-making. However, broader engagement and support for learning programs require further development. While educators highly value dialogue (mean = 4.37) and reciprocal influence (mean = 4.37), generating innovative ideas and maintaining balanced team dynamics remain significant challenges. Additionally, flexibility in leadership roles (mean = 4.36) is inconsistently implemented, and reflective practices (mean = 4.21) lack sufficient integration within daily routines. Context relevance and peer feedback (mean = 4.36) also need more emphasis to foster creativity and relevance. Objective three highlighted a strong, significant correlation (r = .750, p < .000) between collaborative school culture practices and co-constructing theory perspectives, emphasizing their interconnectedness. While school administrators demonstrate effectiveness in goal-setting and professional development, areas such as stakeholder engagement, structured discussions, and reflective practices require reinforcement. Enhancing these areas can improve leadership efficacy and facilitate the practical application of co-constructing theory, ultimately fostering a more collaborative and innovative school environment.



References:

  1. Bhat, M. A. (2023). Contemporary challenges in education: A global perspective. Routledge.
  2. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Dempster, N., Lovett, S., & Flückiger, B. (2016). Leadership and learning: Research, practice and policy. Springer.
  5. Department of Education. (2022). Basic Education Development Plan 2030. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph
  6. Encyclohub. (n.d.). Sampling Techniques: Complete Enumeration versus Sampling – Encyclohub. https://encyclohub.com/sampling-techniques-complete-enumeration-versus-sampling/
  7. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2019). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. Teachers College Press.
  8. Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2018). Distributed Leadership and School Improvement: Leading or Misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 7-22.
  9. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2021). The impact of transformational leadership on student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 165-196.
  10. Llorin, M. (2021). The Impact of Collaborative Cultures on Teacher Engagement in Philippine Schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 15(4), 23-39.
  11. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2015). Building School-Based Teacher Learning Communities: Professional Strategies to Improve Student Achievement. Teachers College Press.
  12. Mislang-Sison, D., & Junio, A. (2019). School Heads’ Supervision Practices andTeachers’ Instructional Performance: Basis for a Proposed Mentoring Program. ASEAN Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3 (1).
  13. Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). (2022). Professional Development in Education: Enhancing Leadership Capacity in Schools. PIDS Policy Brief No. 2022-15.
  14. Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  15. Ramos, J. (2023). Leadership and Collaboration in Philippine Education: Perspectives from School Heads. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(2), 134-150.
  16. Robinson, V. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2007). The leadership of the improvement teaching and learning: Lessons from initiatives with positive outcomes for students. Australian journal of education, 51(3), 247-262.
  17. Spillane, J. P. (2016). Distributed Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.