Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 42 no. 10 (2025)

Exploring Students’ Challenges in Understanding Mathematical Concepts

Irene Mutia

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study is an exploration of students' challenges in dealing with mathematical concepts. Hence, a case study approach was applied through a triangulation of different data sources. Findings revealed significant difficulties in solving rational algebraic expressions, systems of linear equations, linear inequalities, and geometric proofs, underscoring foundational gaps in basic operations, algebraic manipulation, and logical reasoning. Students also struggled with math anxiety, ineffective instructional approaches, and weak conceptual understanding. To cope, they sought help from teachers, peers, and family while engaging in independent learning strategies. The study recommended reinforcing foundational skills, improving instructional methods, and fostering a supportive learning environment through collaborative efforts among students, teachers, and parents. A teaching-learning framework called The MATH (Mastery, Application, Tailored Support, and Holistic Engagement) Framework was proposed to strengthen the skills of the students.



References:

  1. Abakah, F. 2024. Misconceptions of mathematical concepts vis-à-vis how they pose as barriers to developing students’ conceptual understanding. Retrieved from URL: https://gjom.org/index.php/gjom/article/view/1871
  2. Abdullah, N. (2023). Indigenous students’ images and metaphors of mathematics. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 11(2), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol11.2.7.2023
  3. Acharya, B., Mani, I., Acharya, L., Panthi, R., & Dahal, N. (2023). Teaching-learning practices of mathematics in semester system: a case study of tribhuvan university, nepal. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), em038. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13165
  4. Aguboshim, F. and Otuu, O. (2023). Examining the influence of sibling structure on academic performance: a comparative study of younger and elder siblings. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(3), 699-710. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.1131
  5. Aisyah, N., Susanti, E., Meryansumayeka, M., Siswono, T., & Maat, S. (2023). Proving geometry theorems: student prospective teachers’ perseverance and mathematical reasoning. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p377-392
  6. Alhadad, S., Saputro, M., & Fajriah, F. (2018). Students’ academic self-concept and their ability in solving mathematical problems. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 22(2), 96-101. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v22i2.7927
  7. Amin, I. and Mariani, S. 2017. PME Learning Model : The Conceptual Theoretical Study Of  Metacognition Learning In Mathematics Problem Solving Based On Constructivism. Retrieved from URL: https://www.iejme.com/article/pme-learning-model-the-conceptual-theoretical-study-of-metacognition-learning-in-mathematics
  8. Andriana, N., Giovani, S., Asrul, A., Maisi, M., & Rozi, F. (2024). Concerning the role of bk teachers in increasing self-confidence in teenagers. BICC_Proceedings, 2, 192-197. https://doi.org/10.30983/bicc.v1i1.127
  9. Ardianti, S. D., & Wanabuliandari, S. (2021). Ethno-Edutainment Digital Module to Increase Students’ Concept Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823(1), 12073–. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012073
  10. Ariebowo, T. and Puspitasari, E. (2022). Students’ teacher-dependency and passiveness in online learning during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education and Learning (Edulearn), 16(2), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i2.20450
  11. Arslan, A. (2022). The effect of university students’ achievement orientations on lifelong learning tendencies: a structural equation model study. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 51(1), 106-147. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.936014
  12. Atoyebi, O. and Atoyebi, S. (2022). The link between mathematics teaching strategies and students’ anxiety. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v33i4716
  13. Bayaga, A., Bossé, M., & Sevier, J. (2021). Analogical reasoning in geometry proofs. Revija Za Elementarno Izobraževanje, 14(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.2.149-170.2021
  14. Behr, M., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T., Lesh, R., & Zimba, J. (1992). A behavioristic view of rational numbers. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 296-333). Macmillan.
  15. Berch, D. (2016). Why learning common fractions is uncommonly difficult: unique challenges faced by students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 651-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416659446
  16. Berch, D. B., (2016). Why Learning Common Fractions Is Uncommonly Difficult: Unique Challenges Faced by Students with Mathematical Disabilities.
  17. Berch, D. B. (2017). Why Learning Common Fractions Is Uncommonly Difficult: Unique Challenges Faced by Students with Mathematical Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 651–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416659446
  18. Bevan, D. and Capraro, M. M. 2021. Posing Creative Problems: A Study of Elementary Students’ Mathematics Understanding. Retrieved from URL: https://www.iejme.com/article/posing-creative-problems-a-study-of-elementary-students-mathematics-understanding-11109
  19. Bezerra, W., Gontijo, C., & Fonseca, M. (2021). Fostering mathematical creativity in the classroom through feedbacks. Acta Scientiae, 23(2), 88-112. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6213
  20. Braithwaite, D. W., McMullen, J., & Hurst, M. A. (2022). Cross-notation knowledge of fractions and decimals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 213, 105210–105210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105210
  21. Braithwaite, D. and Siegler, R. (2024). A unified model of arithmetic with whole numbers, fractions, and decimals. Psychological Review, 131(2), 431-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000440
  22. Burmansah, B., Rugaiyah, R., Mukhtar, M., Nabilah, S., Ripki, A., & Fatayan, A. (2020). Mindful leadership: the ability of the leader to develop compassion and attention without judgment - a case study of the leader of buddhist higher education institute. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-9-2020(volume9-issue1.html), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.51
  23. Callaman, R. (2023). Mathematics resiliency in the new normal: a theory development. Brillo Journal, 2(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.56773/bj.v2i2.34
  24. Chamundeswari, S. 2014. Conceptual Errors Encountered in Mathematical Operations in Algebra among Students at the Secondary Level. Retrieved from URL: https://www.ijiset.com/v1s8/IJISET_V1_I8_04.pdf
  25. Çiftçi, K. and Karadağ, E. (2021). Multi-group analysis of the effects of coping with mathematics on math anxiety and achievement. Research in Pedagogy, 11(2), 340-350. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2102340k
  26. Choe, K., Jenifer, J., Rozek, C., Berman, M., & Beilock, S. (2019). Calculated avoidance: math anxiety predicts math avoidance in effort-based decision-making. Science Advances, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay1062
  27. Corte, E., Depaepe, F., Eynde, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Students’ self-regulation of emotions in mathematics: an analysis of meta-emotional knowledge and skills. ZDM, 43(4), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0333-6
  28. Daróczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, D., & Nuerk, H. (2015). Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 06. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
  29. Dela Cruz, R., et al. (2023). Socio-Cultural Influences on Rational Number Learning: A Qualitative Analysis of Filipino Primary Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Cultural Psychology, 30(2), 145-160
  30. DePascale, M. and Ramani, G. (2024). The role of math games for children’s early math learning: a systematic review.. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xkvhb
  31. DeWolf, M., Grounds, M., Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. (2014). Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 40(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032916
  32. Dyson, N., Jordan, N., Rodrigues, J., Barbieri, C., & Rinne, L. (2018). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
  33. Falani, I. (2023). Metaphor studies investigation in mathematics education: a systematic review. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijome.v6i1.554
  34. Feinberg, M., Solmeyer, A., & McHale, S. (2011). The third rail of family systems: sibling relationships, mental and behavioral health, and preventive intervention in childhood and adolescence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/
  35. Fery, M., Wahyudin, W., & Herman, T. (2017). Improving primary students mathematical literacy through problem based learning and direct instruction. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.3072
  36. Fuchs, L., Zumeta, R., Schumacher, R., Powell, S., Seethaler, P., Hamlett, C., … & Fuchs, D. (2010). The effects of schema-broadening instruction on second graders’ word-problem performance and their ability to represent word problems with algebraic equations: a randomized control study. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 440-463. https://doi.org/10.1086/651191
  37. Gabriel, F., Buckley, S., & Barthakur, A. (2020). The impact of mathematics anxiety on self-regulated learning and mathematical literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 64(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881
  38. Geary, D. (2011). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(3), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0b013e318209edef
  39. Ghunaimat, M. and Alawneh, E. (2024). The effectiveness of using the solo taxonomy in acquiring students the concepts of coordinate geometry. Ijorer International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(3), 523-536. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i3.592
  40. Guo, W. (2022). Exploratory case study on solving word problems involving triangles by pre-service mathematics teachers in a regional university in australia. Mathematics, 10(20), 3786. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203786
  41. Guo, W. (2023). Solving word problems involving triangles by transitional engineering students: learning outcomes and implications. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12582
  42. Harun, N., Cuevas, K., Sagdi, L., Sapilin, A., Nasilon, N., Kadil, M., … & Solon, L. (2024). Impact of intervention on students’ mastery level and analysis of misconceptions in operations on integers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 5(2), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.02.04
  43. Heddy, B. C., Taasoobshirazi, G., Chancey, J. B., & Danielson, R. W. (2018). Developing and Validating a Conceptual Change Cognitive Engagement Instrument. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00043
  44. Hendriana, H. et al. 2022. The theoretical framework on humanist ethno-metaphorical mathematics learning model: An impactful insight in learning mathematics. Retrieved from URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.1030471/full
  45. Hernandez, D. (2020). Progression of Rational Number Learning: A Longitudinal Study in Philippine Primary Schools. Philippine Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 45-62.
  46. Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02319856
  47. Hollweck, T. (2015). Robert k. yin. (2014). case study research design and methods (5th ed.).. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 108-110. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
  48. Ibrahim, H. (2023). Exploring learning strategies and algebra achievement: a study of senior secondary school students in adamawa state, nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i4/19789
  49. Jailani et al. 2020. High School Students’ Difficulties in Making Mathematical Connections when Solving Problems. Retrieved from URL: http://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/272
  50. Jing, T., Braithwaite, D., & Siegler, R. (2021). Distributions of textbook problems predict student learning: data from decimal arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000618
  51. Jitendra, A., DiPipi, C., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem—solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360010301
  52. Kabael, T. and Baran, A. (2023). An investigation of mathematics teachers’ conceptions of mathematical literacy related to participation in a web-based pisa course. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(2), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1053557
  53. Kaphesi, E. (2017). Exploring motivational factors and self-regulated learning strategies as predictors of students’ anxiety in mathematics learning. Us-China Education Review A, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623x/2017.01.002
  54. Karlsson, N. and Kilborn, W. (2023). Arithmetic and algebraic knowledge in student learning of concepts. https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end001
  55. Kızıltoprak, A. (2017). Relational thinking: the bridge between arithmetic and algebra. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131893
  56. Kul, Ü., Çelik, S., & Aksu, Z. (2018). The impact of educational material use on mathematics achievement: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11420a
  57. Lapadat, J. (2002). Relationships between instructional language and primary students’ learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.278
  58. Lee, S. and Olszewski‐Kubilius, P. (2006). A study of instructional methods used in fast-paced classes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 216-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000303
  59. Lefstein, A. and Snell, J. (2013). Beyond a unitary conception of pedagogic pace: quantitative measurement and ethnographic experience. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 73-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.623768
  60. Lonnemann, J., Linkersdörfer, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Lindberg, S. (2016). Differences in arithmetic performance between chinese and german children are accompanied by differences in processing of symbolic numerical magnitude. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01337
  61. Lyons, I., Nuerk, H., & Ansari, D. (2015). Rethinking the implications of numerical ratio effects for understanding the development of representational precision and numerical processing across formats. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 144(5), 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000094
  62. Mao, C., He, T., Peng, X. Liu, S., & Ge, Q. (2017). Development of a constrained automated geometry reasoning system. Destech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, (mimece). https://doi.org/10.12783/dtetr/mimece2016/9991
  63. Mondahl, J., Hellesø, R., Thomsen, T., Homøe, P., Rosted, E., & Frederiksen, K. (2023). Obstacles for patients with a low socio‐economic status treated within the head and neck cancer pathway: a multiple case study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(17-18), 6585-6598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16691
  64. Nabie, M., Akayuure, P., Ibrahim-Bariham, U., & Sofo, S. (2018). Trigonometric concepts: pre-service teachers’ perceptions and knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5261.169-182
  65. Necdet, G. 2020. Difficulties Encountered by High School Students in Mathematics. Retrieved from URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1278427
  66. Ninnuan, K. and Wongsaphan, M. (2022). Implementation of the learning management model based on cognitive development theory to enhance mathematical problem-solving ability for prathomsuksa 6 students. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i2.19963
  67. Nofrianto, A., Gulo, A., Amri, M., & Rafulta, E. (2022). Student errors in mathematics word problem: what can be learned? Jurnal Gantang, 7(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v7i1.4426
  68. Maciejewski, M. L. (2020). Quasi-experimental design. Biostatistics & Epidemiology,4(1),38-47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/24709360.2018.1477468
  69. Manouchehri, A. and Goodman, T. 2010. Mathematics Curriculum Reform and Teachers: Understanding the Connections. Retrieved from URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220679809597573
  70. Mitzenmacher, M., & Upfal, E. (2017). Probability and computing: Randomization and probabilistic techniques in algorithms and data analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  71. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2019). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  72. Nunokawa, K. 2005. Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics: What we expect students to obtain. Retrieved from URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732312305000283
  73. Orhun, N. 2013. Assessing Conceptual Understanding In Mathematics: Using Derivative Function To Solve Connected Problems. Retrieved from URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16897/176077
  74. Osman, S. (2024). Assessing self-discipline and mathematics achievement among upper secondary school students in malaysia during home online learning initiative: a gender comparison. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(7), 920-926. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.7.2118
  75. Pouta, M., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (2021). Student Teachers’ and Experienced Teachers’ Professional Vision of Students’ Understanding of the Rational Number Concept. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09536-y
  76. Plaza, A., Pongcol, A., Ariar, M., Casio, P., & Galagala, Z. (2022). Coping mechanism of the humss senior high school students of st. paul university surigao in the new normal. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (Ijsms), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v5i3p119
  77. Rasyad, A., Ahmad, A., & Sari, R. (2021). Smart indonesia program monitoring in non-formal education. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211210.009
  78. Reyes, C., et al. (2019). Understanding the challenges of rational number learning in Philippine primary schools. Philippine Journal of Education, 25(3), 45-62.
  79. Ridder, H. (2012). Rezensionen: case study research. design and methods. German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 26(1), 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221202600101
  80. Rodrigues, A., Catarino, P., Aires, A., & Campos, H. (2018). Conceptions of students about creativity and mathematical creativity: two cases studies in vocational education., 1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211357
  81. Saida, K. and Dani, A. (2020). Do the reading skills of emirati students impact their problem solving skills?. International Journal of Education and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.37227/ijekm-2020-04
  82. Santos, E. (2018). Students’ motivational beliefs, values and goals as related to academic hardiness: implications to mathematics teaching and learning. Ijemr, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.22662/ijemr.2018.2.1.001
  83. Santos, R. B., & Lim, J. (2021). Enhancing Rational Number Comprehension: Insights from a Classroom Intervention Study. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(3), 201-215.
  84. Santos, R. B., & Reyes, C. L. (2017). Performance assessment of primary level students in rational number learning. Philippine Journal of Mathematics, 30(1), 112-125.
  85. Scheiner, T., Godino, J., Navarro, M., Pino-Fan, L., & Climent, N. (2022). On metaphors in thinking about preparing mathematics for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(2), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10154-4
  86. Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S., Stricker, J., … & Smedt, B. (2016). Associations of non‐symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta‐analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372
  87. Shi, L., Dong, L., Zhao, W., & Tan, D. (2023). Improving middle school students’ geometry problem solving ability through hands-on experience: an fnirs study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126047
  88. Shin, M. and Bryant, D. (2013). A synthesis of mathematical and cognitive performances of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413508324
  89. Shodikin, A., Nurkumala, S., & Sumarno, W. (2022). Student metacognition in mathematics problem solving on set materials. Mathline Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v7i2.297
  90. Shukla, S., Tombari, A., Toland, M., & Danner, F. (2015). Parental support for learning and high school students’ academic motivation and persistence in mathematics. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v5n1p44
  91. Siegler, R. and Lortie‐Forgues, H. (2017). Hard lessons: why rational number arithmetic is so difficult for so many people. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417700129
  92. Siegler, R. S., & Braithwaite, D. W. (2017). Numerical Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044101
  93. Stoel, G., Drie, J., & Boxtel, C. (2017). The effects of explicit teaching of strategies, second-order concepts, and epistemological underpinnings on students’ ability to reason causally in history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000143
  94. Sudirman, S. 2020. Uncovering the Students’ Mathematical Concept Understanding Ability: A Based Study of Both Students’ Cognitive Styles Dependent and Independent Field in Overcoming the Problem of 3D Geometry. Retrieved from URL: https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Formatif/article/view/3789
  95. Tan, L., et al. (2021). Embracing technology in rational number instruction: A Philippine perspective. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Systems, 30(4), 215-228.
  96. Tan, P. (2016). Developing mathematical understanding and students with emotional and behavioural disorders: a review of the literature. Retrieved from URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13632752.2016.1201639
  97. Theodora, F. R. N. and Hidayat, D. 2018. The Use of Realistic Mathematics Education in Teaching the Concept of Equality. Retrieved from URL: https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/JOHME/article/view/913%3B
  98. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (Second edition). Wiley Blackwell.
  99. Tsang, A. and Harris, D. (2016). Faculty and second-year medical student perceptions of active learning in an integrated curriculum. Ajp Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00079.2016
  100. Vasconcelos, I. C. P., Mamede, E. P. B. da C., & Dorneles, B. V. (2017). The comprehension of numerical relationships in the learning of fractions: A comparative study with Brazilian and Portuguese children. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, 98(249), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.24109/2176-6681.rbep.98i249.3043
  101. Viseu, F., Pires, A. L., Menezes, L., & Costa, A. M. (2021). Semiotic representations in the learning of rational numbers by 2nd-grade Portuguese students. Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 611-624. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1453
  102. Yee, S. P. 2017. Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptual Metaphors for Mathematical Problem Solving. Retrieved from URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ssm.12217
  103. Zakaryan, D., & Ribeiro, M. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ specialized knowledge: A secondary teacher’s knowledge of rational numbers. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1525422
  104. Žakelj, A. and Klančar, A. (2024). Examining the conceptual and procedural knowledge of decimal numbers in sixth-grade elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-13-2024(volume-13-issue-3-july-2024), 1227-1245. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1227
  105. Winer, M. and Battista, M. (2022). Investigating students’ proof reasoning: analyzing students’ oral proof explanations and their written proofs in high school geometry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0677. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11713
  106. Wu, S., Barth, M., Amin, H., Malcarne, V., & Menon, V. (2012). Math anxiety in second and third graders and its relation to mathematics achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162
  107. Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: yin, merriam, and stake. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic