Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 37 no. 8 (2025)

Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Integration on Writing Competency of Senior High School Learners in Calauag National High School

Darius Año | Leodegario Jalos Jr.

Discipline: Artificial Intelligence

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine, investigate, and examine the integration of artificial intelligence on the writing competency of learners at Calauag National High School. The researcher aimed to know how to deal with, use, and integrate artificial intelligence in improving the writing competency of senior high learners, and propose a policy intervention and guideline for the proper use of artificial intelligence that will help policymakers, educational leaders, educators, and students in the teaching and learning process to achieve academic success with integrity and quality. A descriptive statistics as quantitative design and discourse analysis as qualitative design were utilized to gather the data, with the testing activity plan and interview questionnaire serving as the main instrument for data collection. The researcher conceptualized each item in the questionnaire according to research questions to get the best possible answers needed in this study. This study concluded that the difference in writing competencies between students using AI and those not using AI is statistically significant. The mean difference between the two groups is 2.794, with a standard error of 0.51963, indicating that, on average, students who utilized AI performed better in their writing tasks by a margin of 2.794 points These results strongly suggest that AI integration has a positive impact on learners' writing competency, as students who used AI demonstrated significantly higher writing performance compared to those who did not.



References:

  1. Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
  2. Ali, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI): A review of its uses in language teaching and learning. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 769(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/769/1/012043
  3. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
  4. Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
  5. Aljuaid, H.A.  (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ)
  6. Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023). ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep448. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13417
  7. Alotaibi, A. H. E. (2023). The Impact Of AI-Powered Grammarly on Enhancing Grammar Proficiency Among Saudi EFL Students. Remittances Review, 8(4)
  8. Alston, C., Mirghassemi, F., & Gist, C. D. (2022). A course in academic writing as a vehicle for personal growth and transformation. Multicultural Perspectives, 24(3), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2022.2127396
  9. Amo Sánchez-Fortún,  J.Md., Baldrich, K., Domínguez-Oller, J.C. & Pérez-García, C. (2024). Writing in the discipline of education: Beliefs of future teachers regarding their academic literacy. Front. Educ. 9:1422120.doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1422120. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1422120/full
  10. Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to rubrics: A comparison of written and visual feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 100(4), 233-242.
  11. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.
  12. Aschbrenner K. A., Kruse G., Gallo J. J., Plano Clark V. L. (2022). Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials. Pilot Feasibility. Stud. 8:217. 10.1186/s40814-022-01178-x.
  13. Barrot, J. S. (2018). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000533
  14. Bayne, S. (2018). Teacherbot: Interventions in automated teaching. Apertura, 10(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v10n2.1342
  15. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education. 5(1), 7–74.
  16. Bennett, R. E., & Kane, M. T. (2019). Validity and automated scoring. In R. E. Bennett & M. T. Kane (Eds.). Automated scoring and the future of educational assessment (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
  17. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7716416
  19. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33: 1877-1901
  20. Burkhard, M. (2022). Student perceptions of AI-powered writing tools: Towards individualized teaching strategies. In G. D. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaías (Eds.), 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2022) (pp. 73–81). https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2022_202207l010
  21. Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of AI-generated content (AIGC): A history of generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. arXiv, 2303, 04226. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.04226
  22. Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to revisit existing student performance evaluation approach in the higher education sector in a New Era of ChatGPT — A case study. Cogent Education, 10(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461
  23. Chen, C. (2021). A bilingual/L2 hybrid intervention model: combining human and machine intelligence (Doctoral dissertation).
  24. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.
  25. Cheong, C. M., Luo, N., Zhu, X., Lu, Q., & Wei, W. (2023). Self-assessment complements peer assessment for undergraduate students in an academic writing task. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2069225
  26. Coenen, A., Davis, L., Ippolito, D., Reif, E., & Yuan, A. (2021). Wordcraft: A human-AI Collaborative editor for story writing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.07430
  27. Concepcion, R. S., Bedruz, R. A. R., Culaba, A. B., Dadios, E. P., & Pascua, A. R. A. R. (2019). The technology adoption and governance of artificial intelligence in the Philippines. In 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM). https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM48295.2019.9072725
  28. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2017). E-Learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment. New York: Routledge.
  29. Creswell J. W., Plano Clark V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  30. Creswell J. W., Plano Clark V. L., Gutmann M. L., Hanson W. E. (2003). “Advanced mixed methods research designs.” In Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., 209–238. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  31. David, E. (2023). Pausing AI might be a good idea, but companies will not do it. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-elon-musk-pause-development-letter-never-happen-2023-4
  32. Dong, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing academic English writing through AI-powered pedagogy: Practical exploration of teaching process and assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v4i2.1188
  33. DuBose, J., & Marshall, D. (2023). AI in academic writing: Tool or invader. Public Services Quarterly, 19(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2023.2185338
  34. Estrellado, C. and Miranda, J., (2023, March 9). Artificial intelligence in the Philippine educational context: Circumspection and future inquiries. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13,(5).  Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4442136
  35. Fetters M. D. (2020). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  36. Fetters M. D., Molina-Azorin J. F. (2020). Utilizing a mixed methods approach for conducting interventional evaluations. J. Mix. Methods Res. 14, 131–144. 10.1177/1558689820912856
  37. Fontanilla, J.B., Bautista,  K.H., Lactao, M.J. ,  Villacorte, M.A.  & Santos, R. (2023). Educators’ perspectives on the impact of artificial intelligence on writing competence.  International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications (IJMRAP), 6(6), 29-34. https://ijmrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IJMRAP-V6N5P185Y23.pdf
  38. Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. npj Digital Medicine, 6, 75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6
  39. Garcia, N. (2024). Philippine universities release guidelines on AI use in the academe. https://philstarlife.com/news-and-views/576074-philippine-universities-guidelines-ai-use?page=3
  40. Gavilán, J. C. O., Díaz, D. Z., Huallpa, J. J., Cabala, J. L. B., Aguila, O. E. P., Puma, E. G. M., Vasquez-Pauca, M. J., Mansilla, E. B. R., Laura, P. A. S., & Hoces, W. B. (2022). Technological social responsibility in university professors. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 100(100), 104-118.
  41. Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(100055). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
  42. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve the writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
  43. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5–24.  http://doi.org/10125/73474
  44. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660.
  45. Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in asynchronous video communication. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(3), 249-265.
  46. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges — benchCouncil transactions on benchmarks, standards, and evaluations, 2(4), 100089.
  47. Hardesty, P. L. (2024). Guidance, considerations, & intentions for the use of artificial intelligence in West Virginia Schools.
  48. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development for expository writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 291–304.
  49. Hassan, H., Aue, A., Chen, C., Chowdhary, V., Clark, J., Federmann, C., Huang, X., Junczys-Dowmunt, M., Lewis, W., Li, M., Liu, S., Liu, T.-Y., Luo, R., Menezes, A., Huang, H., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The effectiveness of using Grammarly to improve students’ writing skills. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 122–127). https://doi.org/10.1145/3402569.3402594
  50. Huang, Y., & Wilson, J. (2021). Using automated feedback to develop writing proficiency. Computers and Composition, 62, 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102675
  51. Hu, L. (2023 July 17). Generative AI and future. Medium. https://pub.towardsai.net/generative-ai-and-future-c3b1695876f2
  52. Hwang, G., Xie, H., Wah, B.W., and Gašević, D. (2020, January). “Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 1, 100001.  doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001.
  53. Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say?. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572
  54. Jen, S. L., & Salam, A. R. (2024,April). Using Artificial Intelligence for Essay Writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 90–99.  DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.5
  55. Khabib, S. (2022). Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)--based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.vli2.249 
  56. Khalifa, P.,  Albadawy, M. (2024).  Using  artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool.
  57. Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2023). The effects of AI-facilitated writing instruction on learners’ writing motivation and engagement. Journal of Writing Research, 14(2), 1-20.
  58. Koo, M. (2023). The importance of proper use of ChatGPT in medical writing. Radiology, 307(3). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230312
  59. Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15, 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614
  60. Leoste, J. et al. (2021). Perceptions about the future of integrating emerging technologies into higher education — the case of robotics with artificial intelligence. Computers, 10(9), 110 – 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10090110
  61. Liu, M.,   Zhang, L. J., &  Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative ai-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131523002543
  62. Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023). The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT. Heliyon, 9(9), e19688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688
  63. Macdonald, C., Adeloye, D., Sheikh, A., & Rudan, I. (2023). Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis. Journal of Global Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.01003
  64. Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016 j.jbusres. 2020.07.045
  65. Mansilla, E. B. R., Castillo-Acobo, R. Y., Puma, E. G. M., Maquera, Y. M., Gonzales, J. L. A., & Vasquez-Pauca, M. M. J. (2022). Stress in university teachers in the framework of the post-pandemic face-to-face. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33(S1), 71-85.
  66. Marcelo, E. (2023). Vice President Sarah calls for the responsible use of AI in Education. The Philippine Star. https:/www.google.com/amp/s/qa.philstar.com/headlines/2023/10/14/2303591/vice-president-Sara-calls-responsible-use-ai education/amp/
  67. Marikyan, D. & Papagiannidis, S. (2023). Technology acceptance model: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. https://open.ncl.ac.uk / ISBN: 9781739604400.
  68. Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, R., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10, 2236469.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
  69. Mcleod, S. & Evans, O.G. (2024). Albert Bandura’s social learning theory. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html                     
  70. McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1174-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.009
  71. McCarthy, K. S., Roscoe, R. D., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Checking it twice: Does adding spelling and grammar checkers improve essay quality in an automated writing tutor? In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 11625 (pp. 270–282). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204- 7_23
  72. Melchor, P. J. M, Lomibao, L. S., & Parcutilo, J. F. (2023). Exploring the potential of AI integration in Mathematics education for generation alpha — Approaches, challenges, and readiness of Philippine tertiary classrooms: A literature review. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 3 (1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.12691/jitl-3-1-8
  73. Nanquil, L. (2019). Making a difference through effective instructional strategies. Journal of English Teaching, 5(2), 135-143
  74. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7, e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
  75. Nickerson, C. (2024). Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory. https://www.simplypsychology. org/ social-cognitive-theory.html
  76. Nurul, Shofiah and Zulmy, Faqihuddin Putera (2024). Examining the user experience of artificial intelligence tools in academic writing: The perceptions lecturers practices.   DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3871916/v1
  77. O’Cathain A., Murphy E., Nicholl J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 13 92–98. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
  78. OpenAI. (2024). Chatgpt . https://chatgpt.com/c/670373d0-8ca4-800f-b8c4-98e90e750770
  79. Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B, Idika, D. O, Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A. (2023). Exploring the  potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and  assessment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428
  80. Papakonstantinidis, S., Kwiatek, P., Spathopoulou, F. (2024). Embrace or resist? Drivers of artificial intelligence writing software adoption in academic and non-academic contexts. DOI:10.30935/cedtech/14250
  81. Perelman, L. (2018). Critique of automated essay scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55(2), 151–166.
  82. Pinkwart, N. (2016, June). “Another 25 years of AIED? Challenges and opportunities for intelligent educational technologies of the future,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 26 (2), 771– 783. doi: 10.1007/s40593-016-0099-7.
  83. Qasem, F. (2023). ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: Future fears and reassurances. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-03-2023-0043
  84. Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F.  & Ghafar, Z.N. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (Quillbot, Grammarly, and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: A systematic review electronic computer center, University of Diyala CEPECAMI Aligarh Muslim University Department of Nursing, Kurdistan Technical Institute, Sulaimaniyah. https://journal.multitechpublisher.com/index.php/ijir
  85. Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A review of AI-powered writing tools and their implications for academic integrity in the language classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.59588/2961- 3094.1035
  86. Rosales, M. A., Magsumbol, J. V., Palconit, M. G., Culaba, A. B. & Dadios, E. P. (2022). Artificial intelligence: The technology adoption and impact in the Philippines. In 2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management.  https://doi.org/10.1109/hnicem51456.2020.9400025
  87. Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Johnson, A. C., & Mayra, A. (2018). Automatic feedback, self-efficacy, and algebra learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 533-546.
  88. Roselli, D., Matthews, J., & Talagala, N. (2019, May). Managing bias in AI. In Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference (pp. 539–544).
  89. Ryan, K. (2020). An overview of digital writing: Learning and teaching. Gakuen, (954), 15-23.
  90. Salam, A.R.  & Jen, S.L.  (2024, April). Using artificial intelligence for essay writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 90-99.  DOI: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.5
  91. Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help with scientific writing? Critical Care (London, England), 27(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
  92. Santiago, C.S. (2023).  Utilization of writing assistance tools in research in selected higher learning institutions in the Philippines: A textmininganalysis.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376054430_Utilization_of_Writing_Assistance_Tools_in_Research_in_Selected_Higher_Learning_Institutions_in_the_Philippines_A_Text_Mining_Analysis
  93. Slimi, Zouhaier (2023).The impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: An empirical study.  Deusto University-Spain National University of Sciences and Technology Oman. doi:10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17
  94. Sottilare, R. A., Baker, R. S., Graesser, A. C, and Lester, J. C. (2018, June).  “Special issue on the generalized intelligent framework for tutoring (GIFT): creating a stable and flexible platform for innovations in AIED research,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 28 ( 2), 139–151. doi: 10.1007/s40593-017-0149-9.
  95. Subiyantoro, H., Hartono, R., Fitriati, S. W., & Faridi, A. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on English teaching in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the National Postgraduate Seminar, 346–349.
  96. Su, J., Zhong, Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2022). A meta-review of literature on educational approaches for teaching AI at the K-12 levels in the Asia-Pacific region. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(100065), 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100065
  97. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Agyemang, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel? ChatGPT is a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10 (15).  https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40561-023-00237-x
  98. U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Educational Technology (OET). (2023). “Artificial intelligence (ai) and the future of teaching and learning: insights and recommendations”.  https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-shares-insights-and-recommendations-artificial-intelligence
  99. Wahyuddin, Hasman, & Idris, A. R. (2023). Implementation of ChatGPT on english class essay writing skills in university students. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(4), 700–707. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i4.31424
  100. Wang, T., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2022). Towards a tripartite research agenda: A scoping review of artificial intelligence in education research. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (Vol. 104, pp. 3–24). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_1
  101. Wang, T., Liu, J., & Zhu, X. (2020). Effects of AI-facilitated writing instruction on students’ writing motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 419-435.
  102. Wang, J., Shimada, A., Oi, M., Ogata, H., & Tabata, Y. (2020). Development and evaluation of a visualization system to support meaningful e-book learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813178
  103. Watters, A. (2020). Teaching machines: The history of personalized learning. MIT Press.
  104. Yang, G. (2022). A study on applying digitized resources in English language teaching under a blended teaching model: exploration and reflection on online teaching in the context of the pandemic. Pacific International Journal, 5(1), 56–63.
  105. Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). The impact of AI-powered writing tools on learners’ writing abilities. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 14(1), 1-15.
  106. Zhang, K., & Wu, H. (2022). Synchronous online learning during COVID-19: Chinese university EFL students’ perspectives. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094821

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic