Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 43 no. 7 (2025)

Educational Applications: Their Impact to the English Language Learners

Vanessa Orzales

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Due to the declining English skills of students and even professionals in the Philippines, this study evaluated some language applications in tablet PCs using standardized rubric for educational applications and its impact to English language learners (ELL). A descriptive-survey design was employed using purposive sampling. Ten student respondents enrolled in the second semester of SY 2012–2013, who were regular users of tablet PCs, participated in the study. Two instruments were used: (1) a standardized rubric-based evaluation form for assessing the top five educational apps across seven criteria (relevance, customization, accuracy, thinking skills, usability, engagement, and sharing) and (2) a researcher-made questionnaire to gather student perceptions on the impact of these apps to their language learning. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, rankings, weighted means, and standard deviations. The standardized educational application rubric originally created by Harry Walker was used by three English teacher-evaluators to determine if each application meets the criteria needed. Both the evaluation and the gathered data were computed using the weighted mean. Results indicated that the most frequently used application was the search engine, followed by word games, reference tools, quizzes, and eBooks. Among these, all except the quiz apps received “Excellent” ratings across most criteria. The highest-rated categories included usability (M=3.87), relevance (M=3.80), and accuracy (M=3.60). The impact of app usage on English language learning yielded a mean score of 4.27 (SD=0.30), indicating a very high perceived impact. However, the overall rating for all the criteria was “Excellent”. It was concluded that the computer applications are suitable and recommendable for English Language teaching supported by the result of the applications’ impact to the learning of the selected respondents. Thus, the use of these applications greatly aided the users in their language learning.



References:

  1. Agence France-Presse. (2012, September 8). Global tablet sales to top 100 million in 2012 survey. Inquirer Technology. http://technology.inquirer.net/15596/global-tablet-sales-to-top-100-million-in-2012-survey
  2. Alhroth, J. (2011, January 20). Why the iPad? iPad Research. https://ipadresearch.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/why-the-ipad/
  3. Bilén, S. G., Lee, D., Messner, J. I., Nguyen, H. T., Simpson, T. W., Techatassanasoontorn, A. A., & Devon, R. F. (2008). Tablet PC use and impact on learning in technology and engineering classrooms: A preliminary study. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Impact of Pen-Based Technology on Education (WIPTE). Penn State University. https://pike.psu.edu/publications/wipte08.pdf
  4. Boholano, H. (2012). ICT-based instruction in a constructivist classroom [Unpublished thesis]. Cebu Normal University.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Dagdilelis, V. (2005). Principles of educational software design. In M. Pagani (Ed.), Interactive multimedia in education and training. Idea Group Publishing.
  7. Dayagbil, F., Pogoy, A., & Merin, J. (2012). ICT integration in teaching and learning: Effects on attitude, course outputs, and achievement [Unpublished research study]. Cebu Normal University.
  8. Fahy, P. (2005). Planning for multimedia learning. In M. Pagani (Ed.), Interactive multimedia in education and training. Idea Group Publishing.
  9. Falar, S. (2006). The use of computer-assisted instruction in teaching selected topics in algebra: Its effect on student performance and retention [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of San Jose – Recoletos.
  10. Giron, P. (n.d.). 21st century skills: Teacher in the K to 12 Basic Education Program [Video].YouTube.
  11. Goodwin, K. (2012). Use of tablet technology in the classroom. NSW Government: Education & Communities. Retrieved February 8, 2012, from https://cpb-ap-se2.wpmucdn.com/global2.vic.edu.au/dist/1/42368/files/2014/04/iPad
  12. Krashen, S. D. (n.d.). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. http://www.sdkrashen.com/Principles_and_Practice/l.html
  13. Madan, V. (2011, May 16). 6 reasons tablets are ready for the classroom. Mashable. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://mashable.com/2011/05/16/tablets-education/
  14. Manlunas, R. (2006). ICT and cooperative learning: Reinventing the classroom. University of the Philippines Visayas Cebu College. http://www.fited.org/ictcongress/paper/fullpapers/manlunas.pdf
  15. McLean, J. (2010, May 10). For Filipinos, English proficiency is fading. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://www.csmonitor.com/World/AsiaPacific/2010/0510/For-Filipinos-English-proficiency- is-fading
  16. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.).Pearson.
  17. Moras, S. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) and the Internet. Cultura Inglesa de Sao Carlos, Brazil. Retrieved September 8, 2012, from http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/CALL.html
  18. National Centre for Technology in Education. (2012). Tablet PC or tablet [Advice sheet]. Retrieved October 12, 2012, from http://www.ncte.ie/media/Tablet-PCAdviceSheet(June2012).pdf
  19. Owston, R., & Wideman, H. (2004). Tablet PC use at Northern Lights Public School: An initial evaluation. Institute for Research on Learning Technologies.
  20. Quillen, I. (2011, June 15). Educators evaluate learning benefits for iPad. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2011/06/15/03mobile.h04.html?print=1
  21. Ravichandran, T. (2000). Computer assisted language learning (CALL) in the perspective of interactive approach: Advantages and apprehensions. In National seminar on CALL (pp. 82– 89). Anna University. http://homeiitk.ac.in/~trc/call.pdf
  22. Robb, T. (2006). Issue: CALL and the nonautonomous learner: Build but will they come? Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL). USA.
  23. Selasa. (2009, May). Communicative CALL.http://nandabaharuddin.blogspot.com/2009/05/communicative-call.html
  24. Seljan, S. N., & Dovedan, Z. (n.d.). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL). http://drs.fftg.unizg.hr/text/call.pdf
  25. Susser, B. (2006). CALL and content-area teaching. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL). USA.
  26. Torrisi-Steele, G. (2005). Toward effective use of multimedia technologies in education. In Interactive multimedia in education and training. Idea Group Publishing. USA.
  27. Vilbar, A. (2010). Developing Pinoy-designed ESL interactive multimedia software for sustainable development. Philippine Journal for Language Teaching.
  28. Vincent, T. (2012, March 4). Ways to evaluate educational applications. Learning in Hand. http://learninginhand.com/blog/ways-to-evaluate-educational-apps.html
  29. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3–20). Logos International. http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm
  30. Whitney, D. (2012). iPads and tablets for business use. http://www.reelseo.com/ipad-businessuse/#ixzz24b3NKdD7Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/118397

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic