Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 43 no. 9 (2025)

Geometric Proof Competencies of Grade 8 Students

Lilian Manalo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Geometric proof competencies encompass understanding the development of deductive reasoning and logical thinking in students, particularly in the context of mathematical proofs. It also involves exploring how students understand and apply geometric concepts such as definitions, postulates, theorems in the construction of proofs. This study investigated the geometric proof competencies among Grade 8 students, with a focus on understanding their proficiency levels, the challenges they face, and the implications for teaching strategies. Utilizing the Van Hiele Theory of Geometric Thought with five levels: Level 0 (Visualization), Level 1 (Analysis), Level 2 (Informal deduction), Level 3 (Formal deduction), and Level 4 (Rigor), the research presents an in-depth analysis of students' abilities in proving triangle congruence, asserting statements on triangle congruence, and applying these concepts in constructing geometric figures such as perpendicular lines and angle bisectors. The findings revealed a predominant concentration of students at the lower levels of geometric reasoning, highlighting a critical gap in higher-order proof competencies essential for advanced mathematical understanding. Through structured interviews and assessment tasks, the study uncovered key challenges hindering student progress, including Low Conceptual Understanding in Geometric Proof and Lack of Independent Problem-Solving. These insights lead to the development of a video learning guide aimed at bridging these gaps, offering a comprehensive guide that aligns with the Van Hiele levels to foster deeper geometric understanding and reasoning. The study concluded with actionable recommendations for educators, curriculum developers, and policy makers, emphasizing the importance of targeted instructional strategies and resources to enhance students' geometric proof competencies. This research contributed significantly to the field of Mathematics education by identifying specific learning barriers and proposing pedagogical interventions to support effective geometry teaching and learning.



References:

  1. Alahmadi, N.S. (2019). The role of input in second language acquisition: An overview of four theories. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies (BAES).
  2. Alieto, E. & Torres, J.M. (2019). English learning motivation and self-efficacy of Filipino senior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 22(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336286588
  3. Bautista, G. H. , & Valtoribio, D. C. (2016). An Assessment of Grade 8 Geometry Teaching Guide of the K to 12 Basic Education Program Based on Van Hiele Model of Geometric Thinking and Department of Education’s Standards. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(18), 1281-1284.
  4. Bourne, M. 2023. What are geometrical proofs and why are they important?. Interactive Mathematics. https://www.intmath.com/functions-and-graphs/what-are-geometrical- proofs-and-why-are-they-important.php
  5. Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
  6. Casanova, J. R. et. al. (2021). Students’ geometric thinking on triangles: Much improvement is needed. Infinity, 10(2), 217-234. Dokai,
  7. Cirillo, M., & May, L. (2020). Proving in geometry: Understanding teachers’ perspectives and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-09413-7
  8. Cirillo, M., Weiss, M., Herbst, P., & Miyakawa, T. (2021). What do we lose by not having geometry proof in mathematics curricula? Insights from research on reasoning and proving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 63, 100888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100888
  9. Daymiel, R.J. et. al. (2022). Anxiety in second language in relation to students’ speaking performance. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(08). https://spripub.com/sjahss/article/view/SJAHSS-1-8-2-396-410
  10. Datapott Analytics. (2020). Understanding reverse scoring of Likert Scale questions SPSS.
  11. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). Mathematics Curriculum Guide – Grade 8. Republic of the Philippines, Bureau of Curriculum Development. https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/about/k-to-12-basic-education-curriculum
  12. Dodds, E. (2021). Improving your writing will help you speak English better - Here’s how. https://www.leonardoenglish.com/
  13. Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284
  14. Evbuomwan, D. (2013). An investigation into the difficulties faced by form c students in the learning of transformation geometry in lesotho secondary schools. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/10589/dissertation_evbuowan_d.pdf?
  15. Halisoy, H. (2023). Exploring the types of motivation in second language learning: Implications for instruction and learner success. Krisztian, B. (Ed.), The Scientific Heritage, (pp. 25-26).
  16. Hock, T. T., (2015). Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2015, 11(4), 793-802. Received 19 January 2015; accepted 3 March 2015. Copyright © 2015 by iSER, International Society of Educational Research ISSN: 1305-8223
  17. Ibañez, E.D. et al. (2021) Modern Mathematics Applications: Solutions to Challenges Encountered in Teaching Spiral Progression in Mathematics 7. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1-7. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107623.
  18. Illyin, I. & Hanifah, G. & Yunianti, S. (2021). The affective factors influencing students’ speaking ability. UAD TEFL International Conference, 2
  19. Jones, K. et al. (2013). Learning congruency-based proofs in geometry via a web-based learning system. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 33(1), 31- 36.
  20. Jones, K. et al. (2013). Learning congruency-based proofs in geometry via a web-based learning system. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 33(1), 31-36.
  21. K12philippines.com (2015). An Overview of the K to 12 Curriculum in the Philippines https://k12philippines.com/overview-of-k-to-12-curriculum-in-the-philippines/to12CurriculumGuide
  22. MATHEMATICS   (Grade 1toGrade10),   2016. https://depedbohol.org/v2/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Math-CG_with-tagged-math- equipment.pdf
  23. Machisi, E., & Feza, N. N. (2021). Van Hiele Theory-Based Instruction and Grade 11 Students’ Geometric Proof Competencies. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(1), ep21007. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/9682
  24. Magsambol, B. (2020, November 19). PH slides down to 27th in global English proficiency index. Rappler.
  25. Malik, F. (2023). Cognitive Development. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537095/
  26. Merza, LL M. et al (2018). Factors Affecting The Implementation Of Spiral Progression Approach In Relation To Students’ Academic Performance In Mathematics.International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research ISSN 2348-3164 (online) Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp: (490-495), Month: October - December 2018, Available at: www.researchpublish.com
  27. Moradiyousefabadi, M. & Ghafournia, N. (2023). The Impact of Self-Confidence on English Language Proficiency. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374056342
  28. Mwadzaangati, L. (2019). Comparison of geometric proof development tasks as set up in the textbook and as implemented by teachers in the classroom. Pythagoras, 40(1), a458. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v40i1.458
  29. Oxford, R.L. (1990b). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  30. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Oxford, GALA 2003.
  31. Parreῆo, R. L.& Marpa, E. P. 2018. A Qualitative Analysis of Grade Nine Students Difficulties in Geometry. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. ISSN 2348-3164 (online) Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp: (389-398), Month: April - June 2019. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=honors
  32. Peligro, M. R. (2018). Students’ error Analysis on a given Geometric Proofs and Solutions: Its Effect on their Achievement and Conceptual Understanding Technology of SouthernPhilippines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345717074_StudentS’_error.Analysis_on_a_given_Geometric_Proofs_and_Solutions_Its_Effect_on_their_Achievement_and_Conceptual_Understanding_Technology_of_Southern_Philippines
  33. Prayoga, A. (n.d.). Attitude and Motivation Test Battery. Motivation in learning English as second language among students in Pritchard English Academy (PEACE).
  34. Reeves, T. C. (2019). A guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324 /9780203864261
  35. Rahadianto, P., Huda, M.C., & Hadaad, M.A. (2022). Students’ instrumental and integrative motivation in learning English as a foreign language in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching Learning and Literature, 5(1). f22bde4c 76b6bfb462d81c012 0c14aaaa24.pdf (semanticscholar.org)
  36. Reni Astuti et al (2018). Analysis on geometry skills of junior high school students on the concept congruence based on Van Hiele’s geometric thinking level. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1132 012036
  37. Retnawati, H. (2017). The Students’ Difficulties In Completing Geometry Items Of NationalExamination. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications October 2017 Volume: 8 Issue: 4 Article: 03 ISSN 1309-6249. http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/03.heri_retnawati.pdf
  38. Rizkiya, A. & Pratolo, B.W. (2023). Students’ strategies to overcome English speaking anxiety.Premise Journal of English Education,12(2).
  39. Rosen, K. H. (2023). A Guide to Writing Proofs. Discrete Mathematics and Its Application. https://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0073383090/student_view 0/a_guide_to_writi ng_proofs.html
  40. Roysmanto, R. (2018). A correlation between self-confidence and the students’ speaking skill.Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 1(1).
  41. Rubinos, J. S. (2020). Mathematics – Grade 8 Self-Learning Module (SLM) Quarter 2 – Module 7: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and Writing Proofs. First Edition, 2020. Printed in the Philippines by the Department of Education – SOCCSKSARGEN Region. https://fnhs.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/math8_q2_mod7of7_inductive-and-deductive-reasoninh-and-writing-proofs_v2.pdf
  42. Ruthmae S., & Óscar, C. (2015). Students of two-curriculum types performance on a proof for congruent triangles. Konrad Krainer; Naďa Vondrová. CERME 9 - Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic. Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 192-197.
  43. Santos, A.L., Fernandez, V.D., & Ilustre, R.G. (2022). English language proficiency in the Philippines: An overview. International Journal of English Language Studies.
  44. SEI-DOST & MATHTED, (2011). Mathematics framework for philippine basic education.Manila: SEI-DOST & MATHTED. ISBN 978-971-8600-48-1
  45. Sinclair, N., Stephan, M., & Herbst, P. (2022). Geometry instruction and the teaching of proof: A systematic review of trends and approaches. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67, 100927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022. 100927
  46. Sirisilla, S. (2023). Surveys as a type of descriptive research: Data collection through self-administered and interviewer-administered questionnaires. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1234/book.doi
  47. Student Oral Language Observation Matrix – Revised (SOLOM-R). (2024). Purdue University. About Assessment Tools - Purdue University College of Education
  48. Subedi, B. (2023). Revisiting Euclidean geometry in secondary mathematics: Foundations, relevance, and instructional challenges. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023. 100217
  49. Subedi, S. (2019). Chapter 1: Introduction Background of Geometry. https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/bitstream/123456789/10479/2/Chapter%20.pdf
  50. Suliyati, S. & Syahri, I. (2021). The correlations among motivation, self-confidence, and speaking ability of the eighth-grade students. JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia.
  51. Sumarni et al, (2020). Student’s triangles congruence proving through flow proof strategy. National Conference on Mathematics Education (NaCoME). IOP Conf. Series: Journal of  Physics: Conf. Series 1480 (2020)012030. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341377287_Student’s_triangles_congruence_proving_through_flow_proof_strategy.
  52. Tahernezhad, E., Behjat, F. & Kargar, A. A. (2014). The relationship between language learning anxiety and language learning motivation among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(6).
  53. Teach Pinas, 2023. DepEd MELC: k to 12 Most Essential Learning Competencies. https://www.teachpinas.com/deped-melc-k12-most-essential-learning-competencies/.
  54. TIMSS 2019 ENCYCLOPEDIA. Philippines. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/encyclopedia/pdf/Philippines.pdf.
  55. Uclés, R. and Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F.(2022). Reasoning, Representing, and Generalizing in Geometric Proof Problems among 8th Grade Talented Students. Department of Didactics of Mathematics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. Mathematics 2022, 10(5), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050789
  56. Voxco, 2021. Thematic Analysis: Definition, Methods & Examples. https://www.voxco.com/blog/thematic-analysis-definition-methods-examples/
  57. Wang, Y. (2020). Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve active learning. Computers & Education. Volume156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131520301330#preview-section-abstract
  58. Wang, Z. (2018). Error Analysis of 8th Graders’ Reasoning and Proof of Congruent Triangles in China. Journal of Mathematics Education © Education for All. July 2018, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 85-120 https://doi.org/10.26711/007577152790029.
  59. Winer, M. L., & Battista, M. T. (2022). Investigating Students’ Proof Reasoning: Analyzing Students’ Oral Proof Explanations and their Written Proofs in High School Geometry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0677. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11713.
  60. Yong, Y.C. & Ganapathy, M. (2017). To investigate ESL students’ instrumental and integrative motivation towards English language learning in a Chinese school in Penang: Case study. English Language Teaching, (10).
  61. YP Chang (2013). Opportunities to Learn Mathematical Proofs in Geometry: Comparative Analyses of Textbooks from Germany and Taiwan. Die Dissertation wurde am 21.05.2013 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät TUM School of Education am 17.07.2013 angenommen.
  62. Zhang, Y. (2021). An investigation of students’ van Hiele levels of geometric thinking based on    Chinese            Mathematics curriculum. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/10.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic