Home⇛DAVAO RESEARCH JOURNAL⇛vol. 16 no. 1 (2025)

Enhancing Grade 4 Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills Using Manipulatives

Nikka Kris D. Linaza | Shaina Rose O. Gultiano | Bryan L. Susada

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Manipulatives enhance learners’ mathematical problem-solving skills by providing concrete tools to visualize and approach problems. This study investigated their effectiveness among Grade 4 learners at San Rafael Integrated School using a quasi-experimental design. Data were collected through pre-tests, post-tests, and a validated researcher-created questionnaire. The tests measured problemsolving performance before and after the intervention, while the questionnaire explored learners’ experiences with manipulatives. The study aimed to compare the initial problem-solving abilities of the experimental and control groups, analyze differences after the intervention, and evaluate learners’ feedback on using manipulatives. Pre-test results showed no significant difference between the groups, indicating similar starting points. Post-test results, however, demonstrated that the experimental group using manipulatives significantly outperformed the control group, highlighting the effectiveness of this approach. The findings reveal the limitations of traditional teaching methods and underscore the value of manipulatives in improving mathematical problem-solving skills. Integrating manipulatives into regular instruction is recommended to better support learners in mastering essential mathematics concepts.



References:

  1. Abramovich, S., & Freiman, V. (2023). Fostering collateral creativity through teaching school mathematics with technology: What do teachers need to know? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(10), 2217–2242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2113465
  2. Aghli, G., Soleimani, B., Moussavi-Harami, R., & Mohammadian, R. (2016). Fractured zones detection using conventional petrophysical logs by differentiation method and its correlation with image logs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 142, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.02.002
  3. Ahdika, A. (2017). Improvement of quality, interest, critical, and analytical thinking ability of students through the application of research-based learning (RBL) in introduction to stochastic processes subject. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/608
  4. Al-utawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
  5. Angateeah, K. S., Thapermall, S., & Jawahir, R. (2017). Developing interactive ICT tools for the teaching and learning of vectors at A-level. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  6. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2016). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456).
  7. Bartolini, R., & Martignone, F. (2020). The role of manipulatives in promoting understanding of abstract mathematical concepts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1758252
  8. Bruce, K. (2015). Igniting the heart: Preaching and imagination. SCM Press.
  9. Bungao-Abarquez, E. (2020). The use of manipulative in teaching elementary mathematics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(11), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.11.3
  10. Burke, D. (2020). Experiential Learning Theory. In How Doctors Think and Learn. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46279-6_4
  11. Carbonneau, K. J., Wong, R. M., & Borysenko, N. (2020). The influence of perceptually rich manipulatives and collaboration on mathematic problem-solving and perseverance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101846
  12. Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (1999). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex, and problem-solving. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  13. Dewi, A. K., St Y, S., Surya, A., & Syawaludin, A. (2020). Thailand elementary school students’ critical thinking skills in mathematics education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012047
  14. Dewi, R., & Verawati, I. (2021). The effect of manipulative games to improve fundamental motor skills in elementary school students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 10(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2163
  15. Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Dekker, T., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., de Lange, J., & Wijers, M. (2017). Problem solving as a challenge for mathematics education in The Netherlands. ZDM, 39, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0043-2
  16. Ebikawa, Y. G. (2023). Culturally responsive mathematics education: How mathematics has been taught globally and where we are in the US. Alliant International University.
  17. Guanzon-Pisaras, G. F. (2020). Mathematics manipulatives for the development on the numeracy skills of kindergarten pupils. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18868/sherj7j.07.010120.07
  18. Haber, R. B. (2017). Visualization techniques for engineering mechanics. Computing Systems in Engineering, 1(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-0521(90)90046-N
  19. Jimenez, E. (2020). Problem solving ability of first-year high school students in mathematics as affected by cognitive development levels and teaching strategies. SSRN 3530765, 1(3).
  20. Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem-solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
  21. Larbi, E., & Mavis, O. (2016). The use of manipulatives in mathematics education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(36), 53–61.
  22. Lanante, M. G. A. (2019). Effect of problem-solving enrichment activities on mathematics achievement: A case of elementary pupils in the central part of the Philippines. SSRN 3900116.
  23. Lesh, R. (1981). Applied mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305624
  24. Manches, A., & O’Malley, C. (2016). The effects of physical manipulatives on children’s numerical strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1124882
  25. Mitchell, I. K., & Walinga, J. (2017). The creative imperative: The role of creativity, creative problem solving and insight as key drivers for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1872–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.162
  26. Moyer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2020). The role of manipulatives in the learning of mathematics: A review of the research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00314-7
  27. Naukushu, S. T., & Chirimbana, M. (2012). Mathematics papers must have gone crazy. The 7th National Mathematics Congress, Swakopmund Annual Mathematics Congress (pp. 21–22). Swakopmund.
  28. Pedersen, S. A., Mancosu, P., & Jorgensen, K. F. (2005). Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics. Springer.
  29. Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3169–3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728
  30. Pires, A. C., González Perilli, F., Bakała, E., Fleisher, B., Sansone, G., & Marichal, S. (2019, September). Building blocks of mathematical learning: Virtual and tangible manipulatives lead to different strategies in number composition. In Frontiers in Education, 4(81). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00081
  31. Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: Emergence from psychology. In Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 205–235). Brill.
  32. Raoano, M. (2016). Improving learners’ mathematics problem solving skills and strategies in the intermediate phase: A case study of a primary school in Lebopo Circuit. Master’s Thesis, University of Limpopo.
  33. Ross, C. (2008). The effect of mathematical manipulative materials on third grade students’ participation, engagement, and academic performance.
  34. Suastika, K. (2017). Mathematics learning model of open problem solving to develop students’ creativity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/633
  35. Tiongco, M. A. B. (2018). The effectiveness of using manipulatives in teaching fractions in elementary mathematics. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(12), 33–44.
  36. Wang, L., & Li, M. (2021). The effectiveness of manipulatives in teaching mathematical concepts to primary school students in China. Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 123–138.
  37. Yazgan, Y. (2015). Sixth graders and non-routine problems: Which strategies are decisive for success. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(13), 1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2230
  38. Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (2021). Editor’s introduction: What is mathematical visualization. Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 1(8).

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic