Home⇛DAVAO RESEARCH JOURNAL⇛vol. 16 no. 1 (2025)

Analysis on the Morphophonemic Changes of the Cebuano-Binisaya of Davao del Norte

Shiela May R. Abucay

Discipline: others in language and area studies

 

Abstract:

Language variation analysis and studies are becoming increasingly evident at different linguistic levels. These variations can manifest at the morphological and phonological level, highlighting the uniqueness of the language spoken in a particular area. These linguistic features of variations can be observed in the morphophonemic changes in the Cebuano-Binisaya language of Davao del Norte. This paper describes the morphophonemic changes in the Cebuano-Binisaya language spoken in Davao del Norte. The main objective of this study is to analyze and document the morphophonemic changes of Cebuano-Binisaya in Davao del Norte, which covers three (3) cities and eight (8) municipalities. The descriptive linguistic method was used to document the language, and the dialect geography approach was utilized in analyzing and presenting data. The data were collected through personal interviews and eliciting material containing 280 lists by Swadesh, and there are 330 informants from all the cities and municipalities. Based on the results, Cebuano-Binisaya in Davao del Norte exhibits seven (7) substitutions of the phoneme, five (5) deletions of the phoneme, one (1) metathesis, and one (1) assimilation. The limitations of results indicate that the language spoken in Davao del Norte is a dialect of the same language exhibiting a minimal range of morphophonemic changes. The results also suggest that Cebuano-Binisaya in Davao del Norte exhibits linguistic consistency, is influenced by cultural and historical aspects, and serves as a social identity. It is grounded in the emergence of possible dialectal isoglosses, revealing its dynamics.



References:

  1. Andinis, D., Widayati, W., & Simanjuntak, N. M. (2024). Morphophonemic analysis of the novel Ingkar by Boy Candra: Phoneme changes, phoneme additions, and phoneme deletions. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(3), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i3.2030
  2. Baran, B. (2023). Pagkailab-ilab sa Binisdak: A preliminary analysis of the phonological processes in the lexification of the Cebuano/Binisayâ gay lingo. UP Working Papers in Linguistics, 2(1).
  3. Blevins, J., & Garrett, A. (2004). The evolution of metathesis. Linguistics, 42(3), 489–525.
  4. Blust, R. (1991). The greater Central Philippines hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics, 30(2), 73–129.
  5. Cabonce, R. (1983). An English-Cebuano Visayan dictionary. Caloocan: National Book Store.
  6. Census of Population in Davao Region. (2020). Philippine Statistics Authority. (Retrieved June 13, 2022).
  7. Chambers, C., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v35i1.633
  8. Cunanan, F. C. (2015). Ang dialect area ng Bikol-Sorsogon: Isang paunang suri. Daluyan: Journal ng Wikang Filipino, 21(1), 32–64.
  9. Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2022). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (23rd ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. (Retrieved August 2022).
  10. Endriga, D. A. (2009). The dialectology of Cebuano: Bohol, Cebu, and Davao. [Isang disertasyon, Departamento ng Linggwistiks, Unibersidad ng Pilipinas-Diliman].
  11. Fajardo, M. (2022). Dayalektolohiya ng Cebuano sa Iligan: Isang preliminaryong pag-aaral. [Di-gradwadong tesis, MSU–Iligan Institute of Technology].
  12. Hasan, R. (2013). Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. In L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett, & G. O’Grady (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice (pp. 269–299). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018
  13. Hayes, B. (2009). Introductory phonology. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314885
  14. Hickey, R. (2003). How do dialects get the features they have? On the process of new dialect formation. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp. 213–239). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647.013
  15. Javier, J. (2012). Dayalektolohiya ng Inonhan sa Isla de Carabao, Romblon. Daluyan: Journal ng Wikang Filipino, 18(1–2), 1–38.
  16. Kerswill, P. (1987). Levels of linguistic variation in Durham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Kurath, H. (1939). Handbook of the linguistic geography of New England. Providence: Brown University Press.
  18. Labov, W. (2012). Dialect diversity in America: The politics of language change. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812206345
  19. Labov, W. (2012). Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors (Vol. 3). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496
  20. Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2014). A course in phonetics (7th ed.). Wadsworth. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-1.00001-0
  21. Llamzon, T. A. (1978). Handbook of Philippine language groups. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  22. McFarland, C. (2001). Linguistic atlas of the Philippines. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
  23. McKaughan, H. (1964). A study of divergence in four New Guinea languages. American Anthropologist, 66(4, part 2), 98–120.
  24. Milroy, L. (1987). Observing and analyzing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method.
  25. Paz, C. J., Peneyra, I. U., & Hernandez, V. V. (2003). Ang pag-aaral ng wika. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
  26. Petyt, K. M. (1980). The study of dialect: An introduction to dialectology. London: Andre Deutsch.
  27. Rafael, F. (2007). Revisiting word structure in Tagalog. Diliman Review, 54(1), 51–66.
  28. Romaine, S. (2000). Language in society: An introduction to sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198731924.001.0001
  29. Rubrico, J. G. (2011). Filipino variety of Davao: A linguistic description. Paper presented at the 11th Philippine Linguistics Congress, NISMED, University of the Philippines, Diliman.
  30. Samarca, A. (2016). Deskriptibong pag-aaral ng estrukturang gramatikal ng wikang Cantilangnun sa Surigao del Sur. [Isang tesis, Mindanao State University–Iligan Institute of Technology].
  31. Schachter, P., & Otanes, F. T. (1972). Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  32. Taeldeman, J. (1989). A typology of dialect transitions in Flanders. In M. E. H. Schouten & P. Th. van Reenen (Eds.), New methods in dialectology (pp. 155–163). Dordrecht/Providence: Foris.
  33. Thomas, D., & Healy, A. (1962). Some Philippine language subgroupings and reconstruction: A lexicostatistical study. Anthropological Linguistics, 4(1), 21–33.
  34. Trask, R. L. (2004). A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203695111-609
  35. Trudgill, P. (1988). Social dialectology: In honour of Peter Trudgill. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  36. Ultan, R. (1971). A typological view of metathesis. Working Papers on Language Universals. Stanford University, Committee on Linguistics. (Retrieved December 2023).
  37. Wolff, J. (1972). Dictionary of Cebuano Visayan. Ithaca: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program and Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
  38. Zorc, R. (1976). The Bisayan dialects of the Philippines: Subgrouping and reconstruction. Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.2307/3622805
  39. Zorc, R. D., Wolff, J. U., & Hall, W. F. (Eds.). (2023). Historical linguistics of the Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic