Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 43 no. 1 (2025)

Self-efficacy as a Moderator for Work-life Balance and Psychological Well-being of Gig Workers

Emerson Poblete II | Aimee Rose Manda

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

The rapid growth of the gig economy has transformed the nature of employment globally, including in the Philippines, providing flexible work opportunities while introducing challenges related to work–life balance and psychological well-being. Gig workers often face irregular schedules, blurred work–life boundaries, and limited institutional support, which can negatively affect their mental health. This study examined the moderating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between work–life balance and psychological well-being among Filipino gig workers. This study investigates the moderating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between work-life balance and psychological well-being among gig workers in the Philippines. Utilizing a predictive correlational research design, data were gathered from 367 gig workers through convenience and snowball sampling techniques. Standardized instruments were used, including the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), the Work-Life Balance Scale (WLB-15), and Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB). Results revealed a significant positive correlation between work-life balance and psychological well-being (Spearman’s rho = 0.431, p < 0.001). Specifically, two dimensions of work-life balance—Work Interference with Personal Life (WIPL) and Work-Personal Life Enhancement (WPLE)—significantly predicted psychological well-being (p = 0.01). However, Personal Life Interference with Work (PLIW) did not show a significant relationship (p = 0.69). Moreover, self-efficacy significantly moderated the relationship between work-life balance and psychological well-being (interaction estimate = -0.627, p = 0.0007), suggesting that individuals with higher self-efficacy are better able to mitigate the negative effects of work-life challenges. The findings emphasize the importance of enhancing self-efficacy to promote better work-life balance and psychological well-being among gig workers. These insights offer practical implications for employers, policymakers, educators, and mental health professionals in developing targeted interventions for the gig workforce.



References:

  1. Adisa, T. A., Ogbonnaya, C., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). Remote working and employee engagement: A qualitative study of British workers during the pandemic. Information Technology & People, 36(5), 1835–1850. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2020-0850
  2. Ali, S., & Sun, J. (2022). Work–life balance and well-being in the gig economy: Evidence from digital freelancers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 27(1), 45–62.
  3. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. Psychological Inquiry, 8(3), 195–198.
  5. Cabrera, R. M., & Roxas, B. (2023). Psychological well-being and resilience of gig workers in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 77–89.
  6. Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456.
  7. Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In Work and family: A research handbook (pp. 165–183). Psychology Press.
  8. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
  9. Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L.-A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Cengage.
  10. Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010
  11. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  12. Lim, S. Y., & Kim, J. (2024). The role of self-efficacy in managing work–life conflicts among digital freelancers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(3), 512–534.
  13. Lin, Z., Hu, H., & Chen, X. (2025). Effects of social job characteristics on gig workers’ well-being. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 118, Article 103671.
  14. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
  15. Mendoza, D. R., & Rivera, J. M. (2022). Work–life balance and job satisfaction among Filipino remote workers during COVID-19 pandemic. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 143–160.
  16. Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Holten, A. L., & González, E. R. (2009). Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work & Stress, 24(3), 234–259.
  17. Papegowda, D., & Sandhya, K. (2024). Work–life conflict and well-being among gig workers: Role of organizational support and job autonomy. International Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 29(2), 180–195.
  18. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  19. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101832
  20. Sevilla, L. M. (2022). Navigating work–life boundaries in the Philippine gig economy. Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, 41(2), 35–57.
  21. Siu, O. L., Cooper, C. L., & Phillips, D. R. (2005). Age differences in stress, strain, and growth among Hong Kong police officers: The role of work and family support. Aging & Mental Health, 9(6), 526–536.
  22. Smith, A. L. (2020). Human capital implications: Managing talent in the gig economy. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4), 850–877.
  23. Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1140
  24. Vučeković, A., Petrović, I. B., & Živković, M. (2023). Psychological resources and job demands: Examining self-efficacy and resilience among flexible workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 144, Article 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103830
  25. Whitehead, G. P. (2019). The history and future of the gig economy. Small Business Trends.
  26. Zheng, C., Kashi, K., Fan, D., Molineux, J., & Ee, M. S. (2015). Impact of individual coping strategies and organizational work–life balance programmes on Australian employee well-being. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(5), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1020447

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic