Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 42 no. 5 (2025)

The Use of AI Tools in English Language Class and its Impact on the Learning Engagement of Students: Basis for Strategic Framework

Jomel Ocampo

Discipline: Artificial Intelligence

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to determine the use of AI tools in English Language Class and its impact on the learning engagement of students at Vinschool Hanoi, Vietnam. The respondents of the study were students at Vinschool Hanoi, Vietnam. The researcher purposively selects forty (40) students. The respondents determined the common artificial intelligence tools used by English language teachers and assess the level of learning engagement of students before and after the use of Artificial Intelligence tools in English Language class in terms of participation and involvement, motivation and interest, collaboration and communication, skill development, and feedback utilization. Moreso, the researcher utilized the level of performance of students as revealed by their final grade in English. The researcher used the nonprobability sampling utilizing the purposive sampling technique in determining the respondents of the study. The findings revealed that English teachers employ AI tools like Flipped Classroom platforms, Grammarly, and Kahoot. Also, students exhibit significant engagement with artificial intelligence tools in English language classes including participation, motivation, collaboration, skill growth, and feedback application. Moreso, the level of learning engagement of students in English Language class before and after the use of Artificial Intelligence tools is significantly unique in terms of motivation and interest, engagement and participation, collaboration and communication, skill development, and feedback utilization. The utilization of AI techniques has a profound effect on the level of student engagement with English language education. Further, high performance and fluency in the English language are demonstrated by the students' final English grades. Moreover, a substantial correlation exists between the degree of learning facilitated by Artificial Intelligence technologies and the academic success of pupils, as indicated by their final grades in English. As an outcome of the findings and the conclusions, the following recommendations were enumerated: Teachers may use AI-powered applications to complement traditional teaching methods, tailoring activities that promote active participation and personalized learning experiences. Students may engage actively with AI applications by setting clear goals, such as mastering vocabulary or improving pronunciation, fostering a sense of ownership in their learning. School administrators may invest in infrastructure and devices to bridge the digital divide, making AI tools accessible to all students regardless of socioeconomic status.



References:

  1. Azkiyah, S.N. (2023). English proficiency as a predictor of academic performance in the context of non-english as a medium of instruction. PASAA Journal, 65: 32-56.
  2. Cagatan, A.N. (2024). Collaborative learning and learners’ academic performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis, 07(03)
  3. Ella, J.R. (2018). Language learning strategies and english proficiency of grade 12 students. DLSU Research Congress.
  4. El-Sabagh, H.A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(53).
  5. Evans, M.B. (2023). The integration of reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills in the middle school social studies classroom. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 7157.
  6. Faruk, N. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. National Library of Medicine, 6(11).
  7. Guacas, A. F., Urueña Rodríguez, J. A., Santana Trujillo, D. M., Gómez-Galán, J., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Collaborative learning and skill development for educational growth of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3):428.
  8. Howson, C.K. (2021). Student surveys: Measuring the relationship between satisfaction and engagement. Educ. Sci, 11(6):297.
  9. Huang, X. (2023). Social emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Why it matters and how can we measure it?. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1).
  10. Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2023). The Impact of Social Interaction on Student Learning. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 52 (4)
  11. Javid, Z.S. (2023). Effect of using mobile devices as an instructional tool on teachers’ creativity: an interpretive phenomenological study of Pakistani teachers’ experiences. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 17(5).
  12. Kansızoğlu, H.B. (2022). Examining the relationship between prospective teachers’ listening skills, reading habits, effective speech self-efficacy, writing dispositions and communication skills: a sem approach. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(2):412-431.
  13. Khumalo, S.S. (2024). The involvement, engagement and satisfaction of higher education students: a literature review. International Journal of Religion 5(9):638-647.
  14. Kithinji, W., & OHirsi, A. (2022). Relating English Language Proficiency to Academic Performance among non-English Speaking Undergraduate Students in Kenyan Universities. East African Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 66-76.
  15. Li, Y. (2024). The impact of digital educational games on student’s motivation for learning: The mediating effect of learning engagement and the moderating effect of the digital environment. PLoS One. 2024; 19(1): e0294350
  16. Murdoch, Y. D. and Lin, Y., 2023 Factors Mediating the Link Between Engagement and Satisfaction Among Online English-Mediated Instruction Learners During COVID-19, The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 21(3):158-174,
  17. Onyenma, C. (2024). Effects integrating personalized learning environment on students’ achievement in social studies in secondary schools in imo state. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 12(4):1-15.
  18. Philipps, K.R. (2023). The effects of personalized learning on student achievement. Western Kentucky University.
  19. Rajabalee, Y.B. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26:2623-2656.
  20. Rebusa, N.C.C. (2024). Student course engagement and academic life satisfaction of college students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(6): 471-484.
  21. Sadiku, L.M. (2021). The importance of four skills reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of  Language and Literature Studies, 1(1).
  22. Schmid, R. (2022). Implementation of technology-supported personalized learning—its impact on instructional quality. The Journal of Educational Research , 115(3): 187-198.
  23. Simin, G. (2021). Collaborative learning: a key to enhance students’ social interaction skills. ERIC, 8(4):9-21.
  24. Soruc, A. (2023). Students’ academic language-related challenges in English Medium Instruction: The role of English proficiency and language gain. System, 103.
  25. Wang, H. (2023). English language proficiency, prior knowledge, and student success in an international Chinese accounting program. National Library of Medicine, 9(8).

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic