HomeInternational Journal of Research in Advanced Studies and Graduate Educationvol. 1 no. 1 (2025)

Competency Requirements Of Industry For Electrical Engineering Graduates

Pyrene Quilang

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The challenge of engineering education is to simultaneously prepare students for their first job and their career 25 years later. This suggests that engineering education must provide initial competencies for careers. The main purpose of the study is to find out what the competency requirements are of industries for electronic engineering graduates. The list of competencies was identified by the managers and supervisors of agencies that take care of communication systems in government and private firms. Based on the analysis, skills demanded by the industries are both soft skills and hard skills. Soft skills desired by them are communication skills, both oral and written, critical thinking, and problem-solving. Knowledge of the use of technology as a tool to research, organize, evaluate, and communicate information, as well as the use of digital technologies such as GPS, networking tools, and social networks to manage, integrate, evaluate, and create information, is expected from a graduate of Electrical Engineering. Hard skills required by industries from EE graduates are technical skills in managing large-scale electronic equipment or machinery for use in manufacturing or power generation or transmission.



References:

  1. Becker, F. S. (2006). Globalization, curricula reform and the consequences for engineers working in an international company. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600644786
  2. Billing, D. (2003). Generic cognitive abilities in higher education: An international analysis of skills sought by stakeholders. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 33(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920302597
  3. Borrego, M., & Cutler, S. (2010). Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01070.x
  4. Busch-Vishniac, I. J., & Jarosz, J. P. (2004). Can diversity in the undergraduate engineering population be enhanced through curricular change? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(3), 111–122.
  5. Commission on Higher Education. (2008). CMO 34 series of 2008. Retrieved January 1, 2019, from https://ched.gov.ph/cmo-34-s-2008/
  6. Crosbie, R. (2005). Learning the soft skills of leadership. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850510576475
  7. Male, S. A., Bush, M. B., & Chapman, E. S. (2011). An Australian study of generic competencies required by engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.569703
  8. Mihelcic, J. R., Phillips, L. D., & Watkins, D. W., Jr. (2006). Integrating a global perspective into education and research: Engineering international sustainable development. Environmental Engineering Science, 23(3), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.23.426
  9. Pulko, S. H., & Parikh, S. (2003). Teaching ‘soft’ skills to engineers. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 40(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.40.4.2
  10. Swart, A. J. (2010). Does it matter which comes first in a curriculum for engineering students—Theory or practice? International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 47(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.47.2.6
  11. Von Hippel, E. (2001). User toolkits for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 18(4), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00090-X
    1. Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating creativity training into problem and project-based learning curriculum in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.714357