HomeThe PCMC Journalvol. 14 no. 2 (2018)

A Comparison of Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Caudal Anesthesia in Children Undergoing Sub-Umbilical Operation

Richard Andre A. Lucero | Teresita A Batanes | Marichu D. Battad

Discipline: medicine by specialism

 

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Caudal epidural anesthesia is commonly performed in conjunction with general anesthesia. Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine are used in epidural blockade that provide anesthesia and analgesia intraoperative and post-operatively. OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy and safety of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine in children undergoing elective sub-umbilical operations under general and caudal anesthesia. METHODS: Randomized control trial done in Philippine Children’s Medical Center. Sixty-one subjects aged 6 months - 8 years old, ASA I-II, undergoing subumbilical operations were randomly grouped to receive Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine during anesthesia induction. Hemodynamic parameters, Bromage, and CHIPPS were recorded. RESULTS: Results suggest both drugs have a significant effect in lowering heart rate and MAP. Bromage scores for patients from both groups are constant at 0. The number of patients with a CHIPPS classification of 4-10, is significantly higher for bupivacaine group than levobupivacaine group. CONCLUSION: Both Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine provide adequate analgesia intraoperatively with no reports of intraoperative movement, increased inhalational agent concentration and additional intravenous analgesics. Post-operatively, no adverse effects and motor block was noted however Levobupivacaine has a longer efficacy as it required lesser rescue doses post-operatively compared to Bupivacaine.



References:

  1. Sethi N, Chaturvedi R. Pediatric epidurals. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(1):4-5.
  2. Bajwa S, Kaur J. Clinical profile of levobupivacaine in regional anesthesia: A systematic review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:530-9.
  3. Doctor TP, Dalwadi DB, Abraham L, et al. Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl for caudal epidural in pediatric surgery. Anesth Essays Res. 2013;7:212-5.
  4. Ray M, Mondal SK, Biswas A. Caudal anesthesia in paediatric patients: Comparison between bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Indian J Anaesth. 2003;47(4):275-8.
  5. Sen A, Colak MS, Erturk E, et al. A randomized controlled, double-blind comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in minor pediatric surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;66(6):457-61.
  6. Tarkasa AS, Sirsat VS, Chauhan SD, et al. Caudal epidural anaesthesia in children: A comparative study of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2012;2(3):237-42.
  7. Chen AH. Toxicity and allergy to local anesthesia. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1998;26(9):683-92.
  8. Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, et al. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and racbupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46(3):245-9.
  9. Davies K, Wilson G, Engelhardt T. Caudal additives do not improve the analgesia afforded by levobupivacaine after hypospadias repair. Anesth Pain. 2012;1(3):174-7.
  10. Bilgen S, Koner O, Menda F, et al. A comparison of two different doses of bupivacaine in caudal anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: A randomized clinical trial. MEJ Anesth. 2013;22(1):93-8.
  11. Ivani G, De Negri P, Lonnqvist P, et al. A comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:368-71.
  12. Locatelli B, Ingelmo P, Sonzogni V, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(3):366-71.
  13. Ingelmo P, Frawley G, Astuto M, et al. Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for caudal anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:805-13.