HomeSARIRIT: The University Research Journal (formerly QSU Research Journal)vol. 13 no. 1 (2024)

The Perceived Effect of Professional Development Opportunities to Faculty Promotion in a State University

Marissa A. Bulayo | Jessabel Cabbigat | Princess Jhay Estocapio

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

This study presents the perceived effects of professional development opportunities, management support, and rewards on faculty promotion. A total of 61 faculty members of Quirino State University were randomly selected as respondents. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including the t-test and ANOVA, to test relationships. The majority of the respondents were female instructors. Findings revealed that faculty members felt empowered and enabled through professional development opportunities, which fostered active learning engagement and involvement in various activities. Respondents strongly agreed that pursuing advanced studies and continuing professional development is necessary for faculty promotion. Moreover, management support and rewards were also identified as significant factors influencing promotion. Faculty members who had served for 11 years or more expressed greater interest in pursuing advanced studies. Their motivations included improving teaching skills, increasing opportunities for better pay, achieving job stability, developing a specialty, and inspiring future generations. Married respondents placed more value on the University’s Program on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE) and faculty achievements, believing these contribute to their commitment to excellence. They also tended to prefer internal promotion compared to single or widowed faculty, as they sought to acquire the necessary skills to advance their careers, achieve financial stability, and gain job satisfaction. Overall, the university supports its faculty members through salary benefits, rewards for teaching excellence, and the addressing of special needs, whether monetary or non-monetary. Results also showed that years of service significantly affect professional development, while civil status influences agreement levels regarding internal promotion and recognition. Academic rank was likewise found to play a role in the distribution of rewards.



References:

  1. Carnegie, D. (2010). How to win friends and influence people (Rev. ed.). Simon & Schuster.
  2. 1.Civil Service Commission. (2001, January 26). Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2001: Program on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE). Civil Service Commission. Retrieved from https://www.csc.gov.ph/phocadownload/userupload/irmo/mc/2001/mc1s2001.pdf
  3. Civil Service Commission. (2018, July 3). 2017 Omnibus rules on appointments and other human resource actions (ORAOHRA), revised July 2018 [Resolution No. 1800692]. Civil Service Commission. https://www.csc.gov.ph/phocadownload/2017ORAOHRARevisedJuly2018CSCResoNo1800692_af.pdf.
  4. 1.Collins, B. J. (2017). Fair? I don’t care: Examining the moderating effect of workplace cynicism on the relationship between interactional fairness and perceptions of organizational support from a social exchange perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816667896
  5. Commission on Higher Education. (2023). CHED-SIKAP scholarship: A level qualification. Guildhouse School. https://www.bloggersnop.com/ched-sikap-scholarship/.
  6. 1.Davis, C. (2019). What are the reasons why teachers did not pursue master’s degrees? https://l1nq.com/luAKh
  7. de Vries, J. P., Knies, E., & Leisink, P. (2022). Shared perceptions of supervisor support: What processes make supervisors and employees see eye to eye? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20942814.
  8. 1.Department of Budget and Management. (1998, June 1). National Budget Circular No. 461: Guidelines on the implementation of the Common Criteria for Evaluation (CCE) and Qualitative Contribution Evaluation (QCE) for faculty positions in state universities and colleges. Department of Budget and Management. https://www.dbm.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/NBC-No.-461.pdf
  9. Heathfield, S. (2019). Why is employee reward and recognition important? Petaurum HR. https://petaurumhr.co.uk/blog/why-are-employee-rewards-and-recognition-so-important/
  10. Jones, M. (2019). Why is employee reward and recognition important? Petaurum HR. Retrieved from https://petaurumhr.co.uk/blog/why-are-employee-rewards-and-recognition-so-important/.
  11. 1.Knies, E., & Leisink, P. (2014). Linking people management and extra-role behaviour: Results of a longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12023
  12. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  13. Malik, S. K., Ahmad, M., & Khan, R. (2015). Perceived effectiveness of professional development programs of teachers at higher education level. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 169-181.
  14. Manuel, J., & Dupuis, S. L. (2007). Social support and life satisfaction among older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(3), 257–271.
  15. 1.Quirino State University. (2022). Institutional Promotion (IP) policy (Resolution No. 38-295, Series of 2022). https://www.qsu.edu.ph/ip-policy_final-1-20-2023.pdf
  16. Stephen F. Austin State University. (2017). Faculty Development Plan. Nelson Rusche College of Business. https://www.sfasu.edu/sites/default/files/2018-08/faculty_development-083118.pdf.
  17. 1.Stephen F. Austin State University. (2018). Faculty Annual Evaluation Policy and Process. Nelson Rusche College of Business. https://www.sfasu.edu/sites/default/files/2018-01/rusche-annual-faculty-evaluation-20180101.pdf
  18. Stephen F. Austin State University. (n.d.). Faculty Development Plan. Nelson Rusche College of Business. https://www.sfasu.edu/docs/college-of-business/faculty-resources-faculty-development-plan.pdf.
  19. 1.University of Florida. (2024). Tenure & promotion guidelines for 2024–2025. Office of Academic Affairs. https://aa.ufl.edu/media/aaufledu/tenure-and-promotion/TP-Guidelines-2024-25final-.pdf
  20. Wang, D., Heidrich, S. M., & Boerner, K. (2013). Social work faculty interest in aging: Impact of education, knowledge, comfort, and experience. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 34(3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2012.718010