Comparative Study on Attention Span among Undergraduate Students
Jiecel Aira Louise C. Jacildo | Joe Carlo C. Lopez | Maria Queenie Joy M. De Leon | Maria Ryza I. Almario | Jerald Q. Vergara | Kimberly Ann S. Cantilero
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Students face challenges in maintaining attention span, potentially in-fluenced by technology and multitasking habits demanded by the cur-rent school environment. Attention is the cognitive process that ena-bles individuals to focus their senses on a specific stimulus, identify its characteristics, and extract meaningful information. This process is crucial in examining human behavior, as it impacts task performance, social interactions, and overall well-being. With the vast amount of in-formation available on the internet, it has become increasingly chal-lenging to navigate and generalize individual attention spans, espe-cially in local contexts. Moreover, there are only a few studies regarding attention span among undergraduate students across year levels. This study employed a quantitative method, specifically a comparative de-sign, to assess Filipino undergraduate students' capacity to sustain at-tention across different year levels at a private university in Pampanga, Philippines. The researchers employed a Kruskal-Wallis test to analyze data collected from 280 undergraduate students recruited through a quota-sampling technique. Findings revealed that there is no signifi-cant difference (p = 0.14) in the attention span of undergraduate stu-dents, leading to the conclusion that year level does not determine the attentional capacity of students. The findings emphasized the need for inclusive and adaptive teaching strategies that equally cater to all year levels. Furthermore, supporting students’ cognitive health across all stages of higher education, regardless of year level, promotes sustained academic performance and mental well-being.
References:
- Amin, K. E., & Mohamad, F. S. (2021). Working Memory Load Influence on Control of At-tention among Malaysian Undergradu-ates. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Hu-man Development.7(1). https://doi.org/10.33736/JCSHD.2454.2021
- Fajardo, M. L. N., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., & Llinares, C. (2023). Lighting, colour, and geometry: Which has the greatest influ-ence on students' cognitive processes?. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(4), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.02.003
- Godwin, K. E., Leroux, A. J., Scupelli, P., & Fisher, A. V. (2022). Classroom design and chil-dren's attention allocation: Beyond the la-boratory and into the classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 16(3), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12319
- Haddock, A., Ward, N., Yu, R., & O’Dea, N. (2022). Positive effects of digital technology use by adolescents: A scoping review of the lit-erature.ProQuest,19(21), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114009
- Hadi, S. A., Gharaibeh, M., & Alghazo, E. (2023). Impulsiveness among undergraduates from the United Arab Emirates and Jor-dan: role of socio-demographic variables. Health Psychology Research, 11. https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.81045
- Haliti-Sylaj, T., & Sadiku, A. (2024). Impact of Short Reels on Attention Span and Aca-demic Performance of Undergraduate Stu-dents.Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguis-tics,10(3), 60–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.10306
- Hobbiss, M. H., & Lavie, N. (2024). Sustained se-lective attention in adolescence: Cognitive development and predictors of distracti-bility at school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 238, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105784
- Limniou, M., Mansfield, R., & Petichakis, C. (2019). Students’ views for a research-in-tensive school curriculum in psychology: research-teaching nexus. Creative Educa-tion, 10(4), 796-813. https://doi.org/10.4236/CE.2019.104059
- Medvedskaya, E. I. (2022). Features of the At-tention Span in Adult Internet Us-ers.RUDN Journal of Psychology and Peda-gogics,19(2), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-2-304-319
- Ober, P., Poulain, T., Christof Meigen, Spielau, U., Sobek, C., Kiess, W., Igel, U., Lipek, T., & Vogel, M. (2024). Modifiable factors influ-encing attention performance in healthy children: insights from a comprehensive school nutrition study. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19059-8
- Ryzhkov, E. (2023). The Role of Attention in Learning. Medium. https://ti-nyurl.com/57c5t52z
- Sasi, A. S., & Hsu, S. T. (2020). A survey on the study habits of the Taiwanese university students: Comparison of the four years of undergraduate education. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 3(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v3i1.4728
- Shah, P., Thornton, I., Kopitnik, N., Hipskind, J. (2024). Informed Consent.NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/
- Small, G., Lee, J., Kaufman, A., Jalil, J., Siddarth, P., Gaddipati, H., Moody, T., & Bookheimer, S. (2020). Brain health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues in Clini-cal Neuroscience, 22(2), 179–187.
- Sooda, K., Indiramma, M., & Kubakaddi, S. (2024, December). Analyzing P300 Signals to Assess Undergraduate Attention Span Using Impulse Neiry BCI. In 2024 Interna-tional Conference on Brain Computer In-terface & Healthcare Technologies (iCon-BCIHT) (pp. 23-28). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iCon-BCIHT63907.2024.10882396
- Swargiary, K. (2023). The impact of study envi-ronment on students’ academic perfor-mance: An experimental research study.Authorea Preprints. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.170250911.12566888/v1
- Wickens, C. (2021). Attention: theory, princi-ples, models, and applications. Interna-tional Journal of Human-Computer Inter-action, 37(5), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1874741
- Wu, J. Y., & Cheng, T. (2019). Who is better adapted in learning online within the per-sonal learning environment? Relating gender differences in cognitive attention networks to digital distraction. Computers & Education, 128, 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.016