Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Scaffolding Articulation: Fostering Deeper Understanding of Genetic Mutation in Grade 10 Biology

Analie O. Sacedon | Joy A. Bellen | Camille S. Managbanag | Lorieza P. Truya | Vian M. Sarabia | Adelyn Mae B. Suhitado | Beauty D. Verano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Genetic mutation is a foundational yet complex topic in Grade 10 biology, often posing challenges for learners to articulate clearly due to unfamiliar terminology and abstract processes. This action research was conducted in a public secondary school biology class, utilizing a scaffolded teaching approach to develop learners’ articulation ability in the context of genetic mutation. Strategies included scaffolded questioning, structured peer teaching, and learner progress checklists. The data sources included daily written evaluations, classroom observations, and recorded learner discussions. Results indicated only modest improvements in learners’ written assessments, with mean class-level proficiency scores of 74% on the first day, 76% on the second day, and 79% on the third day, suggesting a limited impact on formal testing outcomes. However, the qualitative findings told a richer story: learners demonstrated growing confidence in explaining genetic mutations, an increasing use of scientific vocabulary, and greater participation in collaborative discussions. Thematic analysis revealed progress in organizing ideas and articulating complex biological concepts during class activities. These findings suggest that scaffolding is most effective as a tool for fostering conceptual articulation, rather than a strategy for formal test preparation. The study underscores that for action researchers and practitioners, capturing the evolving voice of learners through qualitative methods is crucial for understanding the actual impact of an intervention.



References:

  1. Acosta, H., Alvarez, L., Angeles, D., Arre, R., Carmona, M., Garcia, A., & Salazar, N. (2015). Grade 10 science learner’s material unit 3 (1st ed.). Department of Education.
  2. Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2023). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
  3. Anzaldo, G. D. (2021). Modular distance learning in the new normal education amidst COVID-19. International Journal of Scientific Advances, 2(3), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v2i3.6
  4. Arzaga, J. S. (2021). Improving the academic performance of grade 7 students in chemistry using the peer tutoring strategy. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(4), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj228
  5. Aykan, A., & Dursun, F. (2022). The effect of active learning techniques on academic performance and learning retention in science lessons: An experimental study. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 2(1), 42–48. Retrieved from https://www.jstei.com/index.php/jsti/article/view/28
  6. Bande, R. J., Cabahit, J. D., Macatual, K. M., Enero, C., Denden, R., & Bellen, J. (2025). Enhancing grade 8 proficiency in analyzing Ohm’s Law concepts through the gamemappro method. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 670–681. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.428
  7. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
  8. Bombardelli, O. (2016). Effective teaching practice: Peer tutoring in education for active citizenship. Educational Psychology, 16, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.36
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). What is hemophilia? CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hemophilia/facts.html
  10. Cerruti, P. (2006). Cri du chat syndrome. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 1(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-1-33
  11. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspsych.2013.26.2.120
  12. Dela Cruz, N. A., Adona, A. J., Molato-Gayares, R., & Park, A. (2025). Learning loss and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of evidence. International Journal of Educational Development, 115, 103271.  http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4749492
  13. Derico, H. U., Guimba, W. D., & Alico, J. C. (2018). Learning competencies of two science textbooks for grade 9: A comparative content analysis based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy of cognitive domain. Education Quarterly Reviews, 1(2), 254–267. doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.01.01.27
  14. Dianela, J. F., Mercado, K. A. R., Vale, M. P., & Paterno, K. V. (2023). Evaluation of the effects of the 8-week learning recovery program on pupils’ reading competencies in the mother tongue, Filipino, and English. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 10(11), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2023.1011010
  15. Dickens, L., & Watkins, K. (1999). Action research: Rethinking Lewin. Management Learning, 30(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507699302002
  16. Fishman, E. J. (2014). With great control comes great responsibility: The relationship between perceived academic control, student responsibility, and self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12057
  17. Gopez, J. M., & Gopez, B. (2024). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and online student engagement among a sample of college students in the Philippines: The mediating role of self-regulation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(2), 1069–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00728-y
  18. Houston, J. E., & Smith, E. V. (2008). Relationship of candidate communication and organization skills to oral certification examination scores. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 31(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278708324443
  19. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (2008). Adolescent thinking. In D. L. Browning (Ed.), Adolescent identities: A collection of readings (pp. 207–220). Analytic Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
  20. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 85–118. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/454
  21. Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
  22. Kon, K. (2020). Karyotype of cri du chat (cat’s cry) syndrome [stock image]. Shutterstock. https://tinyurl.com/phrdvmhb
  23. Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  24. Land, S., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504544
  25. Magdato, N. L., & Satparam, J. R. (2023). Are the right questions being asked? An investigation of questioning proficiency among pre-service teachers. BU R&D Journal, 26, 75-88. Doi:      10.47789/burdj.mbtcbbgs.20232601.7
  26. Mussard, J., & Reiss, M. (2022). Why is genetics so hard to learn? Insights from examiner reports for 16- to 18-year-olds in England. School Science Review, 103(384), 32–40. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10146651/
  27. Ocbian, M., & Pura, J. (2015). Questioning strategies of literature teachers among grade 8 Filipino students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(4), 42–51.
  28. Peracullo, J. C. (2022). Teaching participatory action research as engaged pedagogy in the time of pandemic. Teaching Theology & Religion, 25(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12604
  29. Pinuela, M. F. G. (2025). Design and development of instructional materials to enrich K to 12 STEM biology II curriculum guide: A case of the province of Iloilo, Philippines. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2495530. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2495530
  30. Sambayon, J., Luceñara, D., Luceñara, C., Bayron, Q., Peñaloga, R., & Larombe, E. (2023). Effectiveness of contextualized learning materials in improving the reading skills and comprehension level of the students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(6), 1–11. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7702258
  31. Saputri, A., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., & Prasetyanti, N. (2019). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through cell metabolism learning by employing a stimulating model that fosters higher-order thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2019_1_22.pdf
  32. Science Photo Library. (N.D.). Cri du chat syndrome karyotype. https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/1127816/
  33. Shafeei, K., Hassan, H., Ismail, F., & Aziz, A. (2017). Incorporating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in the ESL classroom context. LSP International Journal, 4(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v4n1.49
  34. Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2012). Using the genetics concept assessment to document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses. Genetics, 191(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.137810
  35. Sumayao, E., & Niez, R. (2016). The art of questioning science teachers in developing the students’ higher-order thinking skills at Naval State University, Naval, Biliran, Philippines. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 5(6), 308-314
  36. Tagare, R. (2023). Back to in-person classes in the Philippine basic education: Threading the opportunities and limitations in the teaching of physical education. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física, 47, 986–993.
  37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  38. Zeipel, H. (2015). Illustrations in science education: An investigation of young pupils using explanatory pictures of electrical currents. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.663 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic