HomeAsia-Pacific Journal of Advanced Research and Innovationvol. 1 no. 1 (2025)

Tracing Academic Impact Through Bibliometrics: The Case Of A Catholic University’S International Research Output

Darin Jan Tindowen | Cecille Luyun

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

This study examines the research utilization of the University of Saint Louis Tuguegarao’s (USLT) published papers in international peer-reviewed journals through bibliometric analysis. Using data from USLT’s Google Scholar profile, the study assessed research productivity, citation impact, and disciplinary distribution. The findings revealed a significant increase in research publications in recent years, with education and pedagogy as the most dominant field. Citation analysis indicated a growing influence of USLT’s research, with a total of 1,647 citations, an H-index of 17, and an I10-index of 31. However, 66.33% of published papers remain uncited, highlighting the need for improved research visibility and dissemination strategies. The study identified USLT’s most cited research papers and authors, with Dr. Darin Jan Tindowen leading in citation impact. The results underscore the importance of fostering international collaborations, publishing in high-impact journals, and strengthening research engagement to enhance USLT’s academic influence. By implementing targeted strategies, the university can further increase the global reach and utilization of its research outputs.



References:

  1. Brembs, B., Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Susi, T., Siems, R., ... & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2023). Replacing academic journals. Royal Society Open Science10(7), 230206.
  2. Clemmons, A., Lebovitz, L., Fulford, M., Greene, K., Franks, A., Branan, T., & Plake, K. I. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on faculty at research-intensive United States schools/colleges of pharmacy. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning14(2), 145-152.
  3. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research133, 285-296.
  4. González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability14(3), 1493.
  5. López, J. M. T. (2021). Building fields of education from Pedagogy: knowledge of education and common activity. Revista de investigación en educación19(2), 81-111.
  6. Lorentzen, D. G., & Nelhans, G. (2024). Informetrics: beyond the citation index. In Handbook On Information Sciences (pp. 205-219). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Noori, A. (2024). Maximizing the Reach and Impact of Scholarly Research Beyond Publication. Journal of Social Sciences-Kabul University7(2), 215-241.
  8. Samala, A. D., Rawas, S., Criollo-C, S., Bojic, L., Prasetya, F., Ranuharja, F., & Marta, R. (2024). Emerging technologies for global education: A comprehensive exploration of trends, innovations, challenges, and future horizons. SN Computer Science5(8), 1-24.
  9. Shih, T., & Forsberg, E. (2023). Origins, motives, and challenges in Western–Chinese research collaborations amid recent geopolitical tensions: findings from Swedish–Chinese research collaborations. Higher Education85(3), 651-667.
  10. Sohrabi, C., Mathew, G., Franchi, T., Kerwan, A., Griffin, M., Del Mundo, J. S. C., ... & Agha, R. (2021). Impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on scientific research and implications for clinical academic training–a review. International Journal of Surgery86, 57-63.
  11. University of Saint Louis. (n.d.). Google Scholar profile. Retrieved March 17, 2025, from https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=yAdXLTIAAAAJ&hl=en