Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 13 no. 1 Part 3 (2025)

Readiness of a Local Government Unit in the Philippines for the Philippine Quality Awards Framework Adoption

Lalaine M. Ongcal | Ma. Rosario B. Tamayo

Discipline: management studies

 

Abstract:

The Philippine Quality Award (PQA) marked a significant step toward promoting continuous improvement, innovation, and quality management in public and private sectors by providing a unified national framework for assessment and recognition (DTI, 2022). With the City Government of Batangas’ commitment to service excellence and previous successes such as the ISO 9001:2015 certification, pursuing the PQA represents a logical next step. This study aimed to determine the readiness of the Batangas City Local Government Unit for PQA framework adoption. Specifically, it described respondents’ profiles in terms of age, sex, educational attainment, and length of service; assessed readiness for PQA adoption across seven categories (leadership, strategy, customer, measurement, analysis and knowledge management, workforce, operations, and results); tested significant differences in responses based on profile variables; and developed a customized performance excellence adoption plan. Using a mixed-method design, the study surveyed 317 regular employees of the LGU. Findings revealed that most department heads were aged 45–64, had long tenures, and held graduate degrees, while rank-and-file employees were generally younger and held undergraduate degrees, with females outnumbering males in both groups. Leadership received the highest readiness rating, while measurement, analysis, and knowledge management rated lowest among department heads, with all dimensions interpreted as “Strongly Agree.” Employees rated leadership and workforce highest, with strategy, operations, and results rated lower, interpreted as “Agree” or “Strongly Agree.” Educational attainment significantly affected leaders' perceptions, while among employees, age, sex, and years in service showed significant differences, supporting the proposed adoption plan to enhance LGU readiness for the PQA.



References:

  1. van Ooijen, C., B. Ubaldi and B. Welby (2019), “A data-driven public sector: Enabling the strategic use of data for productive, inclusive and trustworthy governance”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 33, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/09ab162c-en
  2. Mahoney, J. T., & Kor, Y. Y. (2015). Advancing the human capital perspective on value creation by joining capabilities and governance approaches. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0151
  3. Hemphill, T. A. (2009). National standards strategy: public/private cooperation for global competitiveness. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 19(4), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595420910977416 
  4. Development Academy of the Philippines. (2021). PQA Annual Report and Public Sector Productivity Overview. Pasig City: DAP.
  5. Ali AlShehail, O., Khan, M., & Ajmal, M. (2022). Total quality management and sustainability in the public service sector: the mediating effect of service innovation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(2), 382-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0449 
  6. Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., Sarshar, M., & Newton, R. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. Work study, 51(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020210415488 
  7. Smeyers, P. (2008). Qualitative and quantitative research methods: Old wine in new bottles? On understanding and interpreting educational phenomena. Paedagogica historica, 44(6), 691-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230802486168 
  8. Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. International journal of nursing studies, 48(3), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005
  9. Zhou, Y. (2019). A mixed methods model of scale development and validation analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 17(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1479088 
  10. McKinsey & Company. (2025). Public sector leadership for the future: How government leaders are shaping outcomes beyond their time. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights
  11. Orazi, D. C., Turrini, A., & Valotti, G. (2024). Public sector leadership: The state of the art. International Public Management Journal, 27(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2233312
  12. Gallup. (2024). State of the global workplace: 2024 report. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
  13. Susanto, Y. K., Nugroho, Y. A., & Priyono, P. (2023). Employee well-being and job satisfaction in public sector organizations: A structural model analysis. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(5), 782–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2022-0280
  14. American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). (2024). Citizen satisfaction with federal government services hits a seven-year high. https://www.theacsi.org/news-and-resources/press-releases/
  15. McKinsey & Company. (2023). Great expectations: How US government agencies can meet public demand for better service. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/great-expectations-how-us-government-agencies-can-meet-public-demand-for-better-service
  16. George, B. (2023). Strategic management in the public sector. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smj.2023.04.005
  17. Safi, F. (2022). Strategic planning and implementation in local governments: Impact on service performance. Local Government Studies, 48(6), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2047869
  18. Nugraheni, P. A., Prasetiyo, W. H., Zuhroh, D., & Riyani, A. (2023). Government financial performance analysis using the value for money method. Journal of Public Administration Research, 15(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpare.2023.04.005
  19. McGovern, K. (2023). A public sector journey to operational excellence: Applying Lean principles to public policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003372691
  20. Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Garlatti, A. (2023). Public sector knowledge management: A structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2023-0156
  21. Gebeyehu, G., Ayalew, T., & Belay, A. (2023). Transformational leadership and organizational readiness for change among public sector employees in Ethiopia. Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 19(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JLPS-09-2022-0048
  22. Saks, A. M. (2022). A review of the employee engagement literature: A broader theoretical perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211058855
  23. Walker, R. M., & Boyne, G. A. (2020). Managing customer satisfaction in public service organizations. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 231–242.
  24. Nistor, R., Gherghina, S. C., & Tănase, A. (2023). Knowledge management in public institutions: A systematic review. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(3), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2030371
  25. Ramezan, M., Nazari, K., & Azar, A. (2023). Strategic alignment and its impact on public sector performance. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2247873. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2247873
  26. Ackoff, R. L., & Rinaldi, V. (2021). Enhancing operational efficiency in public sector organizations: A systems perspective. Public Management Review, 23(4), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1795204
  27. Archambeault, D. S., DeZoort, F. T., & Holt, T. P. (2008). The need for an internal auditor report to external stakeholders to improve governance transparency. Accounting Horizons, 22(4), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.4.375
  28. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 677–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x
  29. Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok392
  30. Alharthi, F. B. (2024). Gender differences in perceptions of leadership and their influence on motivation among faculty members of Taif University. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1476526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476526
  31. Eagly, A. H., Carli, L. L., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders (Vol. 11). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm.2009.05324aae.001
  32. Stirpe, L., & Revilla, A. J. (2025). Engaging long-tenured employees via high-performance work systems: a matter of dosages. In Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship (Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 392-411). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-03-2024-0063
  33. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee–organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.
  34. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 89–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01130.x
  35. Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & Brown, K. G. (2002). HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10029

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic