Home⇛Isabela State University Linker: Journal of Engineering, Computing and Technology⇛vol. 1 no. 1 (2024)

Judicial Court Information Management System (J-CIMS) for Regional Trial Court in the Philippines

Aimee G. Acoba

Discipline: information systems

 

Abstract:

To recognize the importance of electronic delivery of public services and identify areas for implementation that will ensure benefits for different users in court proceedings, Executive Order (E.O.) No. 47, s. 2011, Section 5 enhances infrastructure and information systems for e-governance to help boost the country's global economic competitiveness. The research study sought to develop a Judicial Court Information Management System (JCIMS) to digitize the process of filing a case and monitoring its status. The research methodology includes a study of the management of information systems in digitizing the process of filing a case and scheduling hearings. The JCIMS and the Electronic Court Record Keeping (ECRK) systems were established to accept new cases, add new users, and update case schedules. The researcher utilized the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict and explain the acceptance of the system. The results showed a substantial relationship between perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU). PEOU also had an important direct influence on PU. Thus, in this study, criteria in the ISO 25010 software quality model was rated highly acceptable.



References:

  1. Acoba, A. G., Dé la Cruz, P. M., Hernandez, R. J., & Reyes, T. F. (2020). JuCo-IS: A development of web-based information system in Judicial Regional Trial Court. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET) (pp. 22–25). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSET51301.2020.9265362   
  2. Barco Ranera, L. T., Cruz, R. M., & Santos, P. R. (2019). Retrieval of semantically similar Philippine Supreme Court case decisions using Doc2Vec. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Multimedia and Communication Technology (ISMAC), Quezon City, Philippines (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAC.2019.8836165
  3. Cribe, M., Garry, A., & Villanueva, C. (2016, January). QMBTIS case management system with EDMS. Paper presented at DLSU Research Congress, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
  4. Frialde, S. M. (2015, March 26). Open to private backing of judiciary projects. Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/business/2015/03/26/1437800/serenoopen-private-backing-judiciary-project
  5. iGovPhil Program. (2020). Philippine eGovFrame roadmap. iGovPhil. https://i.gov.ph/egovernmentframework-egovframe/philippine-egovframe-roadmap/
  6. Imus, J. K. P., Magleo, E. D., Soriano, M. A. A., & Olalia, R. L., Jr. (2018). Barangay Management Information System (BMIS) for cities and municipalities in the Philippines. International Journal of Computer Applications, 180(19), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018916441
  7. Khalid, S. A., & Lavilles, R. Q. (2019). Maturity assessment of local e-government websites in the Philippines. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.104
  8. Llantos, O. E. (2017). Cloudification of my.eskwela for e-governance in Philippine education. Procedia Computer Science, 109, 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.376
  9. Miguel, J. P., Santos, M. L., & Reyes, L. M. (2014). A review of software quality models for the evaluation of software products. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 5(6). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269417429_A_Review_of_Software_Quality_Models_for_the_Evaluation_of_Software_Product
  10. Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006
  11. Nurussobah, H., Hashim, N., & Rahim, R. (2014). Conceptual framework of functional requirements for the management of electronic court records in the Superior Court of Malaysia. In E-Governance for Societal Change: A Look at Malaysia and Beyond. IGI Global.
  12. Panganiban, A. V. (2013, July 27). ‘Hustisyeah’ to decongest the judiciary. Inquirer.net (Opinion). https://opinion.inquirer.net/57591/hustisyeah-to-decongest-the-judiciary
  13. Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
  14. Villanueva, P. A. G. (2018). Institutional change, corruption and e-government transformation in the Philippines: The Benigno Simeon Aquino III administration. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.015  

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic