Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 11 (2025)

Graduate Students’ Thesis Writing Experiences, Coping Strategies, and Support Needs for Policy Reform

Amelie E. Trinidad | Ronald S. Decano | Reynaldo O. Cuizon

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the lived experiences of graduate students in thesis writing, focusing on their perceptions, strategies, and needs for institutional support. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with master’s students. Findings revealed that thesis writing is a complex process influenced by challenges such as time management difficulties, limited resources, financial constraints, and emotional stress. Despite these obstacles, students demonstrated resilience through adaptive strategies, including effective time management, building support networks, leveraging technological tools, and maintaining open communication with advisers. Participants emphasized the importance of institutional support, including structured research seminars, faculty mentorship, and access to academic resources, as well as psychosocial support, such as mental health initiatives and time management workshops. The study highlights the importance of a comprehensive educational environment that combines pedagogical, technological, and emotional support to enhance the thesis writing experience. Based on these findings, recommendations include faculty mentor training, targeted writing workshops, expanded research resources, and peer writing groups to improve thesis completion and academic writing proficiency.



References:

  1. Alostath, K. (2021). Graduate students’ challenges in academic writing: A thesis proposal. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20113.92008
  2. Aparecio, M. B. M. (2018). Mentoring, self-efficacy, and performance in conducting investigatory projects: A mixed-method analysis. Asia Pacific Institute of Advanced Research, 4(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.25275/apjcectv4i2edu7
  3. Arneback, E., Englund, T., & Solbrekke, T. D. (2017). Achieving a professional identity through writing. Education Inquiry, 8(4), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1380489
  4. Bagaka, J. G., Badillo, N., Bransteter, I., & Rispinto, S. (2015). Exploring student success in a doctoral program: The power of mentorship and research engagement. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10(1), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.28945/2291
  5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  6. Benvenuti, S. (2017). Pedagogy of peers: Cultivating writing retreats as communities of academic writing practice. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.20853/31-2-1340
  7. Capulso, L. B., Salendab, F. A., Jimlan, G. D. J.-I. T., Bermejo, D., Soriano, S., Rabacal, R. N., & Ramada, M. G. C. (2024). Advancing research excellence in Philippine basic education to harness productivity: A comprehensive mixed-methods approach. Migration Letters, 21(S2), 557–578. https://tinyurl.com/2j9cpcua
  8. Casanova, V. S. (2021). Predictors of graduate students' research performance in the Philippine state-run higher education institution. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(5), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n5p170
  9. Castulo, N. J., Marasigan, A. C., Buenaventura, M. L. D., de Vera, J. L., Bagaporo, E. C., Juan, M. P. C. S., & Dalida, N. S. (2025). Contextualizing the challenges of education graduate students in the Philippines: Translating needs analysis into strategic solutions. Discover Education, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00416-7
  10. Chigbu, B. C. (2021). Access to online academic databases to improve the quality of academic research among postgraduate students of education in Nigerian universities. Library Philosophy & Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5726/
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  12. Crumpton, M. A. (2015). The emotionally intelligent mentor. In library staffing for the future (pp. 29–57). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315598434
  13. de Caux, B. C., & Pretorius, L. (2024). Learning together through collaborative writing: The power of peer feedback and discussion in doctoral writing groups. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101379
  14. Durante, P. G. C. (2022). Strengthening collaborative research practices in academia: Factors, challenges, and strategies. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(4), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.531
  15. Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446207536.d10
  16. Edward, P., Orji, U. W., & Isagba, S. (2024). Management of anti-plagiarism software for postgraduate students’ productivity in universities in Delta State. Nigerian Educational Research Journal.
  17. Eisenberg, D., Lipson, S. K., & Posselt, J. (2016). Promoting resilience, retention, and mental health. New Directions for Student Services, 2016(156), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20194
  18. Feizi, S. (2024). Canadian doctoral students’ experiences on their journey toward a Ph.D.: A comprehensive perspective of personal, financial, departmental factors, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 19(1), 1–20.
  19. Gopee, N., & Deane, M. (2013). Strategies for successful academic writing—Institutional and non-institutional support for students. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1624–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004
  20. Jones-Mensah, I., & Hilton, K. (2024). Assessing the statistical differences in academic writing skills across disciplines in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2344379. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2344379
  21. Jusslin, S., & Widlund, A. (2024). Academic writing workshop to support students writing bachelor’s and master’s theses: A more-than-human approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973409
  22. Khozaei Ravari, Z., Ul Islam, Q., Khozaei, F., & Choupan Zarvijani, S. B. (2023). Factors that hinder the thesis writing process of non-native MA students in ELT: Supervisors' perspectives. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(5), 1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2022-0184
  23. Kowalczuk-Walędziak, M., Lopes, A., Underwood, J., Daniela, L., & Clipa, O. (2020). Meaningful time for professional growth or a waste of time? A study in five countries on teachers’ experiences within master’s dissertation/thesis work. Teaching Education, 31(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2019.1649649
  24. Li, L., & Fernandez, F. (2024). Mentoring matters: Examining the relationship between adviser interactions and doctoral student publications. Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01302-1
  25. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  26. Oddone Paolucci, E., Jacobsen, M., Nowell, L., Freeman, G., Lorenzetti, L., Clancy, T., & Lorenzetti, D. L. (2021). An exploration of graduate student peer mentorship, social connectedness, and well-being across four disciplines of study. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 12(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-07-2020-0041
  27. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 44(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
  28. Opengart, R., & Bierema, L. (2015). Emotionally intelligent mentoring: Reconceptualizing effective mentoring relationships. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315598434
  29. Oxley, L. (2016). An examination of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Educational and Child Psychology, 33(3), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2016.33.3.55
  30. Pangket, W. F., Pangesfan, S. K. K., Cayabas, J. P., & Madjaco, G. L. (2023). Research writing readiness of graduate students in a Philippine state college. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.4.9
  31. Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388.
  32. Robinson, C., & Williams, H. (2024). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Learnings from employing IPA as a qualitative methodology in educational research. Qualitative Report, 29(4).
  33. Rong’uno, S. K. (2016). Institutional and student related factors and doctoral studies completion rates in education at selected public universities in Kenya (doctoral dissertation, university of Nairobi).
  34. Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229
  35. Saleem, M. S., Isha, A. S. N., Awan, M. I., Yusop, Y. B., & Naji, G. M. A. (2022). Academic engagement in postgraduate students: Assessing the role of positive emotions, positive psychology, and stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920395
  36. Sidky, G. (2019). Developing students' writing through scaffolding techniques in a workshop forum. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.07
  37. Single, P. B., & Reis, R. M. (2023). Demystifying dissertation writing: A streamlined process from choice of topic to final text. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444053
  38. Stapleton Harris, D. I. (2021). Academic advising for students’ success at the community college level in the West Indies (Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University). https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/9894
  39. Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
  40. Vican, D., Luketić, D., & Gospić, T. (2020). Mentoring support in doctoral studies: Strategies for the effectiveness of mentoring relationships. In INTED2020 Proceedings (pp. 5399–5410). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.1457
  41. Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. (2018). Lev Vygotsky: Learning and social constructivism. In Learning Theories for Early Years Practice (pp. 68–73). SAGE Publications Inc.
  42. Yunus, M., & Bachtiar, B. (2025). Exploring the complexities of thesis writing in the distance mode: Postgraduate students’ perspectives, challenges, and strategies. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-07-2024-0099
  43. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 289–307). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic