HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 11 (2025)

Enhancing the 21st Century Learning Skills of HUMSS-11 Students Through Integrative Performance Task

Joseph D. Ramiscal | Maria Cristina V. Salanga | Dennis J. Pascual

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The policy guidelines on the K to 12 basic education program state that students who graduate must become holistically developed Filipinos equipped with 21st-century learning skills, such as information, media, and technology skills; learning and innovation skills; communication skills; and life and career skills (Briones, 2019). The purpose of this study is to enhance the 21st-century learning skills of the HUMSS-11 students through the integrative performance task. Specifically, it aims to determine students' developmental needs in relation to 21st-century learning skills and to understand how an integrative performance task can enhance these skills. The study used document analysis to interpret the data from students' reflective essays in their portfolios. Based on the study's findings, grade 11 students have greater development needs in communication skills. However, it was also found that most of them have enhanced their communication skills in the integrative performance task, including their life and career skills. Overall, based on the grade 11 HUMSS students' reflective essays in their portfolios regarding their integrative performance task, most of them have enhanced their 21st-century learning skills, specifically in communication and life and career skills. This suggests that integrative performance tasks can help enhance learners’ 21st-century learning skills. These skills will help them prepare to survive in a complex world, become successful in life, and be productive citizens of their country.



References:

  1. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education & Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (N. D.). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. Pearson. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519336.pdf
  2. Battelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning: Definitions (P21). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/dbx6z85f
  3. Briones, L. M. (2019). Policy guidelines on the K to 12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019). Department of Education.
  4. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. doi:10.3316/qrj0902027 
  5. Central Board of Secondary Education. (2020). 21st century skills: A handbook (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5723zps7
  6. Chaiyama, N., & Kaewpila, N. (2022). The development of life and career skills in 21st century test for undergraduate students. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.5 
  7. Cruz, N. T. (2023). Improving the oral communication skills of senior high school students through the use of task-based strategy. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 7(2), 1119–1125. Doi: 10.47772/IJRISS 
  8. Du, G. (2023). The influence of grouping methods on the free-riding behavior in group work. Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information Management, 545–550. 10.2991/978-94-6463-124-1_64
  9. Gaddi, Z. A. (2019). Practical research: Discovering meaning the qualitative way. Golden Cronica Publishing, Inc.
  10. Hazar, E., Akkutay, U., & Keser, H. (2021). Information, media, and technology skills in terms of curricula, process, and product in middle and high schools. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTES), 5(3), 288-310. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.252 
  11. Moneva, J., & Tribunalo, S. M. (2020). Students’ level of self-confidence and performance tasks. Asia Pacific Journal of Academic Research in Social Sciences, 5(1), 42–48. https://tinyurl.com/4xmvustj
  12. Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044 
  13. Nadiah et al. (2019). The students’ self-confidence in public speaking. Elite Journal: Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education, 1(1), 1–11.
  14. Ong, C. G., & Zambas, K. M. D. (2021). A training design for public speaking anxiety [paper presentation]. International Conferences Mobile Learning 2021 (ML 2021) and Educational Technologies 2021 (ICEduTech, 2021), Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines. 
  15. Qualitative Study Design. (2021, June 4). Deakin University. https://tinyurl.com/53fs7e7u
  16. Saldana, J. (2008). An introduction to codes and coding. SAGE Publications.
  17. Samarakoon, U., Imbulpitiya, A., & Manathunga, K. (2021). Say no to free riding: Student perspective on mechanisms to reduce social loafing in group projects. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Volume 1, 198–206. DOI: 10.5220/0010449701980206 
  18. Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing Open, 6, pp. 733-739. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.275  
  19. Tasis, A. N., Berganio, L. E., & Villaverde, K. F. P. (2024). Discovering emerging trends and challenges in event management in the time of pandemic. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 12(2), pp. 202–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11408711 
  20. Yasin, B., Burhan, O. K., Fata, I. A., Mustafa, F., & Komariah, E. (2021). “It’s unfair,” the effect of free riding and social loafing in group discussion in cooperative learning. Proceedings of The 11th Annual International Conference (AIC) on Social Sciences, 222-228. https://tinyurl.com/3u82rbs3
  21. Vivekanandan, R. (2019, February 14). Integrating 21st century skills into education systems: From rhetoric to reality. https://tinyurl.com/2swwyzs8
  22. Wirayudha, A., Shakti Firdaus, F., Ariq Maajid, R., Nurfarida, F., & Iqbal Santosa, M. (2024). Social loafing behavior of students in the group learning process in faculty of economics and business universitas Islam Bandung. KnE Social Sciences9(22), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i22.16669