HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 9 (2025)

Assessing Technology and Livelihood Education Skills and Academic Performance of Elementary Pupils in Digos City

Meriam P. Berido | Queenie Lyn G. Almerez | Amelie E. Trinidad | Rikka Bianca Condes | Helen W. Noel

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the significant relationship between Technology and Livelihood Education skills and the performance of elementary pupils, providing a basis for an intervention program. A non-experimental, quantitative research design employing a descriptive correlational approach was used in the study, which involved 324 public elementary grade six pupils in the Digos Oriental district, Digos City, Philippines. The primary data source for this study was a teacher-made or self-designed instrument and a validated survey questionnaire. The study found that the overall respondents’ level of skills was a mean score of 2.71, described as proficient or average, across the areas of Technology and Livelihood Education, including Agri-Fishery Arts, Home Economics, Industrial Arts, Entrepreneurship, and ICT. Furthermore, the pupils’ TLE skills suggested that the study sample was primarily composed of different statements, but with corresponding means and descriptive levels. In terms of TLE pupils’ level of skills, the results revealed that both Agri-Fishery Arts and Home Economics achieved the same mean score of 2.76, ranking them in the highest category. However, there were some pupils ' skills/competencies in Home Economics, Industrial Arts, and ICT who did not meet the standard requirements of the industries for future employment. In addition, pupils’ TLE performance was rated at a very satisfactory level in the specified areas of TLE. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between TLE skills and the performance of elementary pupils; therefore, administrators may address the diverse population of grade six pupils by revising the curriculum and proposing further enhancements to the training or intervention program. TLE teachers can continually improve the systems and procedures in delivering their instruction and consider additional intervention programs or goal-oriented actions through integrative and collaborative activities as part of the competency or skills management program.



References:

  1. Abella, C. R., Co, A. G., & De Jesús, F. (2021). Teaching outside specialization from the perspective of science teachers. Open Access Library Journal, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4326/oalib.1107725
  2. Asio, J. M. R., & Jiménez, E. C. (2020). Effect of remediation activities on grade 5 pupils’ academic performance in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). Pedagogical Research, 5(4), Article em0075. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8464
  3. Basal, D. V. (2022). Instructional Competencies of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Teachers: Basis for a Competency-Based Module. International Journal of Research Publications, 96(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100961320222948
  4. Casiño, A. A., & Tantiado, R. C. (2024). Students’ motivation and academic performance in technology and livelihood education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i03-59
  5. De Jesus, F. S., & De Jesus, M. B. (2021). Spending habits of public-school teachers in Palayan City. Open Access Library Journal, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106332
  6. Eden, C. A., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Cultural competence in education: Strategies for fostering inclusivity and diversity awareness. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.895
  7. Elli, M. C. A., & Ricaffort, J. D. (2020). Competencies of grade VI teachers in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 10(4), 25425–25434. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED607222.pdf
  8. Fernando, F. (2020). Experiential learning in sustainability: Opportunities, building partnerships, and student engagement. In K. Lorett (Ed.), Diverse pedagogical approaches to experiential learning: Multidisciplinary case studies, reflections, and strategies (pp. 93–109). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42691-0_7
  9. Gaurino, J. B., & Estrellado, M. E. L. (2023). Performance level of grade five pupils in information and communication technology. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 4(3), 71–82. https://uijrt.com/articles/v4/i3/UIJRTV4I30008.pdf
  10. Gelinder, L., Hjälmeskog, K., & Lidar, M. (2020). Sustainable food choices: A study of students’ actions in a home and consumer studies classroom. Environmental Education Research, 26(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1698714
  11. Indriani, F., Alqisan, N. H., & Okfitri, N. N. (2021). Innovative learning era industrial revolution 4.0 in optimizing 21st century competence elementary school students. In Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 3147–3157). https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2021indonesia/570.pdf
  12. McLeod, S. (2025). Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html
  13. Salvador, R., Limón, M., Borromeo, C. M., Parinas, M. A., Manrique, L., De La Cruz, L., & Dalere, J. M. (2022). Exploring technical-vocational education teachers’ challenges and adaptation strategies in teaching courses outside their specializations. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(2), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.02.004
  14. Sotto, Y. T. (2020). Agriculture and fishery arts. Sun Star Pampanga. https://tinyurl.com/mt4p8mwk.
  15. Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Yasin, R. M., & Hashim, H. U. (2023). Identifying and validating vocational skills domains and indicators in classroom assessment practices in TVET. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065195