Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 9 (2025)

Grade 7 Students’ Perceptions of Class Homogenization and Inclusivity and their Relationship to Academic Performance

Vebhie Joy C. Salvan | Jay Fie P. Luzano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The composition of classrooms has become a key focus in educational research due to its significant influence on student learning outcomes. This study employed a quantitative descriptive research design to explore Grade 7 students' perceptions of class homogenization and inclusivity, as well as their relationship to academic performance. Experts validated a self-made questionnaire and pilot-tested with a homogeneous class to assess reliability, yielding a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.925. The results revealed that students in highly homogenized classes have a mean score of 3.8 (SD = 0.326), reflecting a "very high level of agreement" about their positive learning environment. Conversely, students in less homogenized classes indicated a mean score of 3.6 (SD = 0.412), also demonstrating agreement but with more response variability. In an inclusive environment, students in highly homogenized classes scored 3.8 (SD = 0.445), affirming their belief in equal participation and supportive teachers. Students in less homogenized classes scored 3.76 (SD = 0.447), also showing a "very high level of agreement." The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference in academic performance between the two groups: students in highly homogenized classes (Mean = 89.9, SD = 2.82) and less homogenized classes (Mean = 83.2, SD = 4.57), with a statistically significant result (U = 107, p < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed a weak positive relationship between class homogeneity and academic performance (p = 0.313, p = 0.013), whereas the relationship between inclusivity and academic performance was not statistically significant (p = 0.042, p = 0.744). Overall, class homogenization had a measurable effect on academic performance, with students in highly homogenized classes having higher academic scores. Inclusivity was rated highly in both groups; however, no significant relationship was found between inclusivity and academic performance. These findings suggest that educational strategies should consider class composition to enhance students’ academic outcomes.



References:

  1. Alnahdi, G. H. (2020). Inclusive education in Saudi Arabia and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A critical analysis. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1634796
  2. Ballen, C. J., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., Searle, J. B., & Zamudio, K. R. (2017). Enhancing diversity in undergraduate science: Self-efficacy drives performance gains with active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), ar56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344
  3. Burns, R. B., & Mason, J. (2002). The influence of class composition on student performance. Educational Studies, 28(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569022000020930
  4. Campoy-Cubillo, M. C. (2019). Functional diversity and the multimodal listening construct. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1581402
  5. Deskmate, A., Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2013). The role of classroom environment in student learning. International Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.002
  6. Ertesvåg, S. K., Havik, T., Vaaland, G. S., & Lerang, M. S. (2024). Teachers’ instructional support and students’ peer relationships in the classroom. Teachers and Teaching, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2389394
  7. Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.778111
  8. Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback, and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101296
  9. Hienonen, L., Kallio, J., & Rantala, J. (2018). The effects of class composition on academic performance. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(4), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3356
  10. Huang, W., & Zhu, R. (2020). The effect of peers on students’ academic achievement: Evidence from China’s middle schools. Journal of Population Economics, 33(1), 93–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00780-8
  11. Jardinez, M. J., & Natividad, L. R. (2024). The advantages and challenges of inclusive education: Striving for equity in the classroom. Journal of Education and Human Development, 13(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v13n1a3
  12. Kuzmina, Y., & Ivanova, A. (2018). The effects of academic class composition on academic progress in elementary school for students with different levels of initial academic abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.004
  13. Lindner, M., Nusser, M., Gehrer, K., & Schwab, S. (2021). The relationship between inclusivity and academic performance in diverse classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(6), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1761234
  14. Manyatsi, T. (2020). Implementation of inclusive education in high schools in Eswatini: Teachers’ preparedness and challenges. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(6), 75–88. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2020/June-2020/07.pdf
  15. Mavuso, M. F. (2020). Challenges facing teachers in implementing inclusive education in Swaziland’s secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(8), 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1516824
  16. Mazenod, A., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2018). Nurturing learning or encouraging dependency? Teacher constructions of students in lower attainment groups in English secondary schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441372
  17. Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Witkow, M. (2019). The effects of inclusive education on academic and social outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000345
  18. Salehi, M., Khosravi, H., & Khosravi, M. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of homogeneous grouping on academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09456-5
  19. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
  20. St. John, E. P., Hu, S., & Fisher, J. (2021). The impact of class composition on student engagement and performance. Journal of Higher Education, 92(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1751234
  21. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254
  22. Zimmermann, F., Gorges, J., & Ludwig, J. (2023). How tracking affects student motivation and performance: Evidence from a German secondary school reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2080143

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic