Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 12 (2025)

Teacher Agency: Bridging Gaps in Elementary Curriculum Implementation

Jade T. Librando

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This comparative case study investigates the widespread challenge of curriculum implementation gaps in elementary education by examining teacher experiences across three distinct curricular approaches in the Philippines. The research addressed a critical gap in the literature by simultaneously analyzing foundational (Blocks of Time), revised (K-12), and pilot (MATATAG) curricula to identify systemic barriers and effective adaptive strategies. Utilizing in-depth thematic analysis of interviews with three public school teachers (representing Kindergarten, Grade 3, and Grade 4), the study provided a detailed, triangulated perspective across diverse contexts. Principal results consistently revealed a profound systemic misalignment—characterized by content overload, rigid pacing mandates that conflict with pedagogical goals, and widespread resource deficits. In response, the study determined that Teacher Professional Agency functions as an unrecognized operational safeguard, enabling continuity through strategic content prioritization and peer collaboration (Learning Action Cells). The major conclusion is that these implementation failures fundamentally undermine the success of policy. This necessitates an urgent policy shift that formalizes Teacher Agency as a core strategy for effective, localized curriculum delivery, moving beyond treating it as a simple coping mechanism.



References:

  1. Blasabas, R. J., & Sumaljag, M. V. (2021). Philippine K to 12 implementation: Difficulties and coping strategies of public elementary school administrators. SLONGAN, 5(1), 63–87. https://tinyurl.com/4hmh4n3a
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
  4. Dela Cruz, A., & Reyes, M. (2024). Teacher autonomy and adaptive strategies during the MATATAG curriculum transition. Journal of Educational Innovation and Practice, 8(1), 120–135. https://tinyurl.com/2vyu9f2u
  5. Dizon, R. B., & Cruz, F. C. (2022). The cost of curriculum reform: Teacher stress and professional efficacy in high-workload settings. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 7(2), 45–60. https://tinyurl.com/4sdrcr6e
  6. Guevara, L. S. (2021). Implementation of play-based learning in Kindergarten: Challenges and parental involvement in rural schools. Philippine Journal of Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 30–45.
  7. Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19—School leadership in crisis? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3–4), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0038
  8. Kilag, O. K., Sasan, J. M., Largo, J. K., & Alvez, G. U. (2024). The implementation of the MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(1), 10–25. https://tinyurl.com/ynxphndm
  9. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  10. Magno, C. R. (2022). Developmental assessment challenges in early grades: Aligning policy with teacher practice. Philippine Education Review: ECE Focus, 8(3), 110–125.
  11. Mendoza, L. V., & Mendoza, J. M. (2021). Curriculum congestion in the K to 12 program: Teacher perspectives on content overload and pacing. Philippine Journal of Education, 45(2), 50–65. https://tinyurl.com/52a9m7kz
  12. Mercado, D. G. (2023). Decentralization and local curriculum adaptation in DepEd: A policy analysis. Philippine Educational Policy Review, 6(1), 70–85.
  13. Navarro, E. M., & Santos, C. L. (2024). Beyond compliance: Teacher perspectives on professional development needs for the MATATAG curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies and Research, 10(1), 25–40.
  14. O'Dwyer, M., & Smith, J. (2021). The impact of implementation fatigue on educational change: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 780–801. https://tinyurl.com/4mbx3kmx
  15. Panti, A. C., Panti, A. V., & Panti, A. M. (2022). Elementary teachers' challenges in the implementation of the K-12 curriculum in a new normal setup. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(2), 1–15. https://tinyurl.com/mry4wyxv
  16. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2020). Teacher agency in the curriculum: Intentionality and the professional. Curriculum Inquiry, 50(4), 369–390. https://tinyurl.com/4hzrf4wh
  17. Ramos, E. F., & Estrella, M. C. (2024). Resource constraints and training gaps in the MATATAG curriculum rollout: A logistical analysis. Philippine Educational Review, 5(1), 20–35. https://tinyurl.com/2p8ad2b5
  18. Sarmiento, L. F. (2023). Teacher retention and job satisfaction amidst continuous educational reform. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 15(4), 95–110.
  19. Torres, A. L., & Manalo, B. G. (2023). Professional autonomy and peer collaboration: Teacher strategies in navigating curriculum reform. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 150–165. https://tinyurl.com/2mhr3m6n
  20. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic