Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 10 (2025)

The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs): Challenges and Opportunities in the Philippine Domestic Shipping Decarbonization

Emerson M. Reyes

Discipline: maritime technology

 

Abstract:

The global shipping sector faces strong decarbonization targets, requiring major emission cuts by 2030, 2040, and net zero by 2050. In the Philippines, domestic shipping is vital for connectivity, making this challenge urgent. This study explored Filipino ECOPs’ roles, awareness, challenges, and opportunities in advancing maritime decarbonization policies and practices. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining survey responses from ECOPs, semi-structured interviews with participants, and document analysis of national and international maritime policies. Quantitative analysis assessed awareness and readiness levels, while qualitative insights revealed systemic challenges and enabling conditions. The findings revealed that ECOPs demonstrate moderate to high awareness of environmental aspects of decarbonization (68.6%), yet significant gaps persist in regulatory knowledge, economic understanding, and technical applications (48%). Opportunities for ECOPs’ engagement were rated as “moderate potential” (WM = 3.22), with enabling factors deemed “sufficient” (WM = 2.85). Respondents recognized ECOPs’ capacity to drive technological adoption and policy innovation, though barriers, including restricted access to decision-making, inadequate training, and limited mentorship, pose “major challenges” (WM = 3.15). Policy analysis affirmed national alignment but underscored weak mechanisms for meaningful ECOP participation. ECOP integration is vital to strengthening the Philippines’ maritime decarbonization agenda. Strategic measures such as advisory councils, capacity-building programs, and curriculum reforms are recommended to empower ECOPs for of sustainable shipping transitions in archipelagic contexts.



References:

  1. Abu, M. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.12 62
  2. Ajani, A. O., Padonu, N. S., & Tairu, O. A. (2024). Organisational change and workforce performance: A study of selected registered maritime firms. Abuja Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.7118/tkg7mj93
  3. Alamoush, A. S., Ölçer, A. I., & Ballini, F. (2022). Ports’ role in shipping decarbonisation: A common port incentive scheme for shipping greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.10 0021
  4. Alimen, R. A., Cicero, E., & Cecilia, M. (2019). Maritime command-language: Understanding its role in the global seafaring profession among maritime youth in the Philippines. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159- 5879/2019.01.005
  5. Arof, A. M. (2018). Decision making model for Ro-Ro short sea shipping operations in archipelagic Southeast Asia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.03.0 05
  6. Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis. SAGE. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019397
  7.  Bilgili, L. (2023). A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 182, 113367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113 367
  8.  Bissias, I. G., Pallis, A. A., & Theotokas, I. N. (2025). Gen Zers and the seafaring profession: A generational approach to enrolment in merchant marine academies. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-024- 00355-4 EM Reyes, 2025 / The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs) IJMABER 5007 Volume 6 | Number 10 | October | 2025
  9. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  10.  Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp 063oa
  11. Breakwell, G. M., Wright, D. B., & Barnett, J. (2020). Research methods in psychology. SAGE. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019108#page=358
  12. Buscema, F., Grandi, A., & Colombo, L. (2023). How can the seafarers do it? Qualitative research in psychosocial risks of South Italy’s seafarers. International Maritime Health, 74(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.2023.0006
  13. Caesar, L. D. (2023). Emerging dynamics of training, recruiting and retaining a sustainable maritime workforce: A skill resilience framework. Sustainability, 16(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010239
  14.  Cambaliza, M. O. L., Yu, L. E., Latif, M. T., Lestari, P., & Wu, X. (2023). Regional and urban air quality in Southeast Asia: Maritime continent. In Handbook of air quality and climate change (pp. 533–591). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15- 2760-9_68
  15.  Chang, P.-C., Chou, W.-S., Chiang, W.-S., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2025). Application of qualitative research to analyze the knowledge and skill requirements for maritime operational safety. In 2025 IEEE Underwater Technology (UT) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ut61067.2025. 10947377
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  18. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  19. Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Open University Repository. https://oro.open.ac.uk/75449/1/
  20. Dawadi %2C%20Shreshta%20and%20Giri%202 021.pdf Demir, S. B., & Pismek, N. (2018). A convergent parallel mixed-methods study of controversial issues in social studies classes: A clash of ideologies. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 119– 149. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0 038
  21. Department of Energy. (2023). DOE strategic plan 2023–2028: Transforming the Philippine energy sector. DOE.
  22. Department of Energy. (2023). Philippine energy transition roadmap 2023–2050. DOE.
  23. Dixon, J. (2025). Analyzing cyberattacks in the maritime domain using hierarchical clustering and descriptive statistics. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 12(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/48817079
  24.  DNV & Singapore Maritime Foundation. (2023, June 8). Study highlights upskilling needs of seafarers in the areas of decarbonization and digitalization. DNV. https://www.dnv.com/news/2023/dnvand-smf-study-highlights-upskillingneeds-of-seafarers-in-the-areas-of-decarbonization-and-digitalization-244162/
  25. DNV. (2023). Seafarer training and skills for decarbonized shipping. DNV. https://www.dnv.com/publications/seafarer-training-and-skills-for-decarbonized-shipping-235124/
  26. Global Maritime Forum. (2021). The next wave: Green corridors. Global Maritime Forum. https://globalmaritimeforum.org/report/the-next-wave-green-corridors/
  27. Grydehøj, A., & Casagrande, M. (2019). Islands of connectivity: Archipelago relationality and transport infrastructure in Venice Lagoon. Area, 52(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12529
  28. Guerra-García, J. M., Navarro-Barranco, C., Martínez-Laiz, G., Moreira, J., Giráldez, I., Morales, E., Fernández-Romero, A., Florido, EM Reyes, 2025 / The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs) IJMABER 5008 Volume 6 | Number 10 | October | 2025 M., & Ros, M. (2020). Assessing environmental pollution levels in marinas. Science of the Total Environment, 762, 144169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144169
  29. He, S., Wu, X., Wang, J., & Lu, Y. (2025). Shipping emission inventory preparation with AIS data: A stratified random sampling method. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 138, 104520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.1045 20
  30. Heirs, S., & Manuel, M. E. (2021). Sustainable maritime career development: A case for maritime education and training (MET) at the secondary level. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 15(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.01.08
  31. Hidayat, R., & Pratiwi, S. (2023). Environmental awareness of cadets: The eco-navigator concept in maritime education. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 7(1), 27–35. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ14372 37.pdf
  32. International Maritime Organization. (2023). Readiness of low- and zero-carbon marine fuels technology: Full report. GreenVoyage2050 Project. https://greenvoyage2050.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Readiness-of-Low-ZeroCarbon-Marine-Fuels-Technology-FullReport-v1.pdf
  33.  Issa-Zadeh, S. B. (2025). Decarbonizing seaport maritime traffic: Finding hope. Maritime Sustainability, 6(2), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020047
  34.  Jia, H., Jiang, L., & Azevedo, P. (2024). Green premium and the role of financial investors in sustainable investment in container shipping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 189, 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.1036 58
  35. Joung, T.-H., Kang, S.-G., Lee, J.-K., & Ahn, J. (2020). The IMO initial strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.201 9.1707938
  36.  Jović, M., Tijan, E., Brčić, D., & Pucihar, A. (2022). Digitalization in maritime transport and seaports: Bibliometric, content and thematic analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(4), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10040486
  37.  Jung, R., Gundlach, S., & Hasselbring, W. (2022). Thematic domain analysis for ocean modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 150, 105323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105323
  38. Kim, H., Lee, D., & Park, S. (2025). Developing a DACUM-integrated competency framework for shore-based maritime professionals. Sustainability, 17(14), 6455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146455
  39.  Kontovas, C. A. (2020). Integration of air quality and climate change policies in shipping: The case of sulphur emissions regulation. Marine Policy, 113, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103815
  40.  Koukaki, T., & Tei, A. (2020). Innovation and maritime transport: A systematic review. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(3), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.07.0 09
  41. Lind, M., Lehmacher, W., & Ward, R. (2023). Maritime decarbonization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 39936-7
  42. Mallouppas, G. (2021). Decarbonization in the shipping industry: A review of pathways and technologies. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(4), Article 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040415
  43. Mao, Z., Ma, A., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Towards carbon neutrality in shipping: Impact of European Union’s emissions trading system for shipping and China’s response. Ocean & Coastal Management, 249, 107006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.107006
  44. Masodzadeh, P. G., Intlekofer, A., Börjesson, M., & Cariou, P. (2022). A review of barriers EM Reyes, 2025 / The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs) IJMABER 5009 Volume 6 | Number 10 | October | 2025 and solutions for shipping decarbonization. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 190, 114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114008
  45. Matheus, A. (2024). Human capital development: Bridging the skills gap in the maritime administration of Namibia [Master’s thesis, World Maritime University]. The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/2373
  46. Mestemaker, B. van, & Castro, B. G. (2020). Designing the zero emission vessels of the future: Technologic, economic and environmental aspects. International Shipbuilding Progress, 67(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.3233/isp-190276
  47. Mission Innovation. (2023). Green shipping corridors—Reports and approaches. Mission Innovation. https://mission-innovation.net/missions/shipping/green-shipping-corridors/reports/ Monios, J. (2019). Environmental governance in shipping and ports: Sustainability and scale challenges. In Sustainability and scale in maritime governance (pp. 13–29). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978- 0-12-819134-7.00002-2
  48. Moros-Daza, A., & Jubiz-Diaz, M. (2024). Labour force management in maritime ports: A comprehensive systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(11), e31401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31401
  49. M., & Brodnicke, O. B. (2025). Global priorities for ocean sustainability from Early Career Ocean Professionals. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 82(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae20 1
  50. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42–52. https://cssrjournal.com/index.php/cssrjournal/article/view/170
  51.  Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019- 103145
  52. Olaniyi, E. O., Atari, S., & Prause, G. (2018). Maritime energy contracting for clean shipping. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 19(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004
  53. Palconit, E. V., & Abundo, M. L. S. (2018). Electric ferry ecosystem for sustainable interisland transport in the Philippines: A prospective simulation for Davao City–Samal Island route. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 38(4), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.201 8.1512606
  54. Palconit, E. V., & Lochinvar, M. (2019). Transitioning to green maritime transportation in the Philippines: Mapping of potential sites for electric ferry operations. Nanyang Technological University Repository. https://ntu.edu.sg
  55. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023). Maritime workforce statistics – Seafarer demographics. PSA. Puig, M., Wan, Z., & Notteboom, T. (2023). Green digital shipping corridors: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11030457
  56. Reuters. (2024, December 3). A sea-change for seafarers as the shipping industry gears up to decarbonise. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/sea-change-seafarers-shipping-industry-gears-up-decarbonise-2024-12-03/
  57.  Rokhmah, N., & Susilo, A. (2024). Enhancing global maritime education: A qualitative exploration of post-internship perspectives among cadets. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 12(2), 87–102. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385451770
  58.  Roman, R., Kostianaia, E., Bowes, A., Satterthwaite, E., Savage, C., Edua, X., Fox, N., Boujmil, I., Nocito, E., Santamaria, S. M., Maggioni, T., Ndah, A., Onwubiko, C., Higa, K., Juma, G. A., Mwangi, P. N., Offei-Darko, L., Khatib, L., Elegbede, I., & Oguguah, N. (2024). Building bridges for ocean sustainability: The evolution and impact of the Early Career Ocean Professional (ECOP) Programme. Marine Technology Society Journal, 58(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.4031/mtsj.58.1.4
  59. Satterthwaite, E. V., Robbins, M., Crespo, G. O., Puskic, P. S., Giddens, J., Kostianaia, E., Giron-Nava, A., Elsler, L. G., Rguez-Baron, J. EM Reyes, 2025 / The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs) IJMABER 5010 Volume 6 | Number 10 | October | 2025
  60. Scully, S. (2018). The marine people partnership: Building a workforce for our ocean industries through ocean literacy. Semantic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/03bf/dcba82dacfa8b34ed 4e885d52a92aeec0896.pdf
  61. Sereda, A. V., Mikhaylichenko, Y. G., Baklanov, P. Y., Kachur, A. N., Lappo, A. D., & Danilova, L. V. (2021). Contribution of an integrated maritime policy to the dialogue of civilisations: The Asia-Pacific case. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(6), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060610
  62. Shah, B., Andrioti, D., & Jensen, O. C. (2018). Training needs among maritime professionals: A cross-sectional study. International Maritime Health, 69(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.2018.0019
  63. Sharma, A., & Nazir, S. (2021). Assessing the technology self-efficacy of maritime instructors: An explorative study. Education Sciences, 11(7), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci110703 42
  64. Tadros, M., Ventura, M., & Soares, C. G. (2023). Review of current regulations, available technologies, and future trends in the green shipping industry. Ocean Engineering, 280, 114670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.202 3.114670
  65. Thammawan, P., & Bartusevičienė, I. (2024). Perspectives of participants on onboard training: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 8(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.202 4.2408698
  66. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/publication/reviewmaritime-transport-2023
  67. Vakili, S., & Ölçer, A. I. (2023). Are battery-powered vessels the best solution for the domestic ferry segment? Case study for the domestic ferry segment in the Philippines. Energy, 282, 128323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128323
  68. Valdez Banda, O. A., Goerlandt, F., & MacKinnon, S. N. (2023). Digital transformation in maritime education: Curricular and institutional challenges. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023- 00292-7
  69.  Van, M., & Wiegmans, B. (2018). Short sea shipping: A statistical analysis of influencing factors on SSS in European countries. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-018- 0032-3
  70. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  71. Vozzo, M. L., Christofidis, M., Griffiths, L., Kelly, R., Manion, M. L., Barmand, S., Bolin, J. A., Fuenzalida-Miralles, P. A., Harris, M. L., Issell, A., Kuempel, C. D., Martinez Diaz, M., Murunga, M., Palmer, S. R., Schaefer, N., & Simpson, J. (2025). Advancing ocean sustainability through better science integration: Perspectives of Early Career Ocean Professionals. Frontiers in Ocean Sustainability, 2, Article 1526776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fosoc.2025.152 6776
  72.  Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Development and validation of a survey instrument (AKA) towards attitude, knowledge and application of STEM. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(1), 63–76. https://www.ceeol.com/search/articledetail?id=950660
  73.  Wang, P., & Mileski, J. (2018). Strategic maritime management as a new emerging field in maritime studies. Maritime Business Review, 3(3), 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-06-2018- 0019 EM Reyes, 2025 / The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs) IJMABER 5011 Volume 6 | Number 10 | October | 2025
  74. Wang, Q., Zhang, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, P. (2023). The use of alternative fuels for maritime decarbonization: Special marine environmental risks and solutions from an international law perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1082453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.108 2453
  75. Wang, S. H., Wang, X. B., Han, Y., Wang, X. Y., Jiang, H., Duan, J. L., Hua, R., & Zhang, Z. X. (2023). Decarbonizing in maritime transportation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 13(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2023.13201 8
  76. Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., Stewart, R. A., & Sunkpho, J. (2020). Applying mixed methods sequential explanatory design to innovation management. In Lecture notes in mechanical engineering (pp. 485–495). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15- 1910-9_40
  77.  Wiśnicki, B., Wagner, N., & Wołejsza, P. (2021). Critical areas for successful adoption of technological innovations in sea shipping – The autonomous ship case study. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.202 1.1937071
  78. World Bank. (2021). Charting a course for decarbonizing maritime transport: Summary for policymakers and industry. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/680021617997493409/pdf/Ch arting-a-Course-for-Decarbonizing-Maritime-Transport.pdf
  79. Xiao, G., Wang, Y., Wu, R., Li, J., & Cai, Z. (2024). Sustainable maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), 1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101728
  80. Yildirim, U., Nart, S., Akar, S., Sarialioğlu, S., Toygar, A., Vardar, B., Kaya, S. Ç., & Sari, M. (2024). In-depth exploration of challenges faced by women in the Turkish maritime industry: A qualitative study. Work, 78(2), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-230391

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic