HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 47 no. 2 (2025)

Mitigation of the stresses of acid sulfate soils by terrestrial and aquatic plants (Melaleuca armillaris and Phragmites australis) under varying moisture regimes

Patrick Michael | Robert J. Reid | Robert W. Fitzpatrick

 

Abstract:

The long-term roles of live plant roots in mitigating stresses due to acid sulfate soil remain poorly understood. Three studies, each lasting twelve months, were conducted using Melaleuca armillaris and Phragmites australis. In the first study, alkaline sandy loam soil was mixed into the sulfuric soil to increase the pH to 6.7, and M. armillaris seedlings were planted. In the second and third studies, M. armillaris and P. australis were planted in sulfuric and sulfidic soils and maintained at 75% water-holding capacity and flooded soil conditions. All the studies were set using 300mm stormwater tubes with sealed bottom ends. The treatments were replicated four times, set up under a glasshouse in a completely randomized design, and harvested after 12 months. The pH and root biomass were measured from the surface, middle, and deep profiles. Results showed that the neutralization obtained by mixing alkaline sandy loam soil with sulfuric soil was stable but deteriorated due to plant root penetration. In the sulfuric soil material (pH <4), M. armillaris produced more roots at the surface than in the deep soil under circumneutral pH and aerobic soil conditions. In sulfidic soil material (pH >4), more roots were produced in the deeper soils. In the sulfuric and sulfidic soil materials, P. australis produced more roots at the surface than at the deep soil under pH >4 and aerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions with a pH >4, root distribution was even. Our findings suggest that common terrestrial and aquatic plants maintain a characteristic distribution of roots to mitigate the stresses of acid sulfate soils.



References:

  1. Bob, J., & Michael, P. S. (2022). Nutrient dynamics under unmanaged rubber, cocoa, and oil palm plantations in a sandy soil under humid lowland tropical climatic conditions. International Journal of Environment, 11(1), 46-61. https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/IJE/article/view/45839
  2. Che, J., Zhao, X. Q., & Shen, R. F. (2023). Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptation to acid soils: A review. Pedosphere, 33(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.10.001scienzadelasuolo.org+2PMC+2
  3. Chen, Z. C., & Liao, H. (2016). Organic acid anions: An effective defensive weapon for plants against aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 43(11), 631-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.11.003
  4. Dang, T., Mosley, L. M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Marschner, P. (2016). Addition of organic matter to sulfuric soil can reduce leaching of protons, iron and aluminium. Geoderma, 271, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.012
  5. Jayalath, J., Mosley, L. M., Fitzpatrick, R. W., & Marschner, P. (2016). Addition of organic matter influences pH changes in reduced and oxidised acid sulfate soils. Geoderma, 262, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08. 012
  6. Jones, A. M. (2022). Determining the critical low pH of Phragmites australis in relation to its suitability for use in acid mine drainage remediation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1314 0/RG.2.2.17419.36645
  7. López-Arredondo, D. L., Leyva-González, M. A., González-Morales, S. I., López-Bucio, J., & Herrera-Estrella, L. (2014). Phosphate nutrition: Improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65, 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949
  8. Lu, H. L., Nkoh, J. N., Baquy, M. A.-Al, Dong, G., Li, J.-Y., & Xu, R.-K. (2020). Plants alter surface charge and functional groups of their roots to adapt to acidic soil conditions. Environmental Pollution, 267, Article 115590. https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.envpol.2020.115590
  9. Michael, P. S., & Reid, J. R. (2018). Impact of common reed and organic matter on the chemistry of acid sulfate soils. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 18(2), 542-555. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162018005001603ResearcchGate+1
  10. Michael, P. S., Fitzpatrick, R., & Reid, R.J. (2015). The role of organic matter on amelioration of acid sulfate soils with sulfuric horizons. Geoderma, 225, 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.023
  11. Michael, P. S., Fitzpatrick, R. W., & Reid, R.J. (2016). The importance of soil carbon and nitrogen in amelioration of acid sulfate soils. Soil Use and Management, 32(1), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12239
  12. Michael, P. S., Fitzpatrick, R. W., & Reid, R. J. (2017). Effects of live wetland plant macrophytes on acidification, redox potential and sulfate content in acid sulfate soils. Soil Use and Management, 33(3), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.11 11/sum.12362
  13. Michael, P. S. (2015a). Effects of alkaline sandy loam on sulfuric soil acidity and sulfidic soil oxidation. International Journal of Environment, 4(3), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.3126/ije.v4i3.13229
  14. Michael, P. S. (2015b). Effects of organic amendments and plants on the chemistry of acid sulfate soils under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 148(457-458), 185-186. https://www.royalsoc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/RSNSW_148-2_ Micheal.pdf The Royal Society of NSW
  15. Michael, P. S. (2018a). Effects of live and dead plant matter on the stability of pH, redox potential and sulfate content of sulfuric soil material neutralised by addition of alkaline sandy loam. Malaysian Journal of Soil Science, 22,1-18. https://www.msss.com.my/mjss/Full%20Text/vol22/V22_01.pdf
  16. Michael, P. S. (2018b). The roles of surface soil carbon and nitrogen in regulating surface soil pH and redox potential of sulfidic soil of acid sulfate soils. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 41(4), 1627-1642. https://w ww.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjtas/browse/regular-issue?article=JTAS-1347-2018
  17. Michael, P. S. (2018c). Comparative analysis of the ameliorative effects of soil carbon and nitrogen amendment on surface and subsurface soil pH, Eh and sulfate content of acid sulfate soils. Eurasian Soil Science, 51, 1181-1190. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318100083 ResearchGate+1
  18. Michael, P. S. (2020a). Co-existence of organic matter and live plant macrophytes under flooded soil conditions acidify sulfidic soil of acid sulfate soils. Tropical Plant Research, 7, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpr.2020.v7.11.004 ResearchGate
  19. Michael, P. S. (2020b). Management of acid sulfate soil under aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions revolves around organic matter and live plant macrophytes. Annals of Tropical Research, 41(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr4211.2020ResearchGate+1
  20. Michael, P. S. (2020c). Organic carbon and nitrogen amendment prevent oxidation of subsurface of sulfidic soil under aerobic conditions. Eurasian Soil Science, 53, 1743-1751. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320120078ResearchGate+1
  21. Michael, P. S. (2020d). Plants with modified anatomical structures capable of oxygenating the rhizosphere are threats to sulfidic soils under varying soil moisture regimes. Asian Journal of Agriculture, 4(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g040205ResearchGate+1
  22. Michael, P. S. (2021a). Role of organic fertilizers in the management of nutrient deficiency, acidity, and toxicity in acid soils: A review. Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology, 12(3), 19-30. Retrieved from https://ikprress.org/index.php/JOGAE/article/view/7286ResearchGate
  23. Michael, P. S. (2021b). Positive and negative effects of addition of organic carbon and nitrogen for management of sulfuric soil material acidity under general soil use conditions. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 54(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10. 17951/pjss.2021.54.1.71-87
  24. Pons, L. J. (1973). Outline of the genesis, characteristics, classification and improvement of acid sulphate soils. In H. Dost (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Acid Sulphate Soils: Introductory papers and bibliography (Vol. 1, pp. 3-27). International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement. https://edepot.wur.nl/183770
  25. Peláez-Vico, M. A., Tukuli, A., Singh, P., Mendoza-Cózatl, D. G., Joshi, T., & Mittler, R. (2023). Rapid systemic responses of Arabidopsis to waterlogging stress. Plant Physiology, 193(3), 2215-2231. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiad433Pub Med+1
  26. Rengel, Z. (2015). Availability of Mn, Zn, and Fe in the rhizosphere. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15(2), 397-409. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718 -95162015005000036
  27. Sauter, M. (2013). Root responses to flooding. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 16(3), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.013
  28. Soil Survey Staff. (2022). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/guides-and-instuctions/keys-to-soil-taxonomy
  29. Tilley, D. J., & John, L. St. (2012). Plant guide for common reed (Phragmites australis). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen, ID Plant Materials Center. https://plants/usda.gov/DocumentLibrary/plantguide/pdf/pg_phau7.pdf.
  30. Timotiwu, P. B., Agustiansyah, A., & Muslimahi, D. (2023). Effect of iron (Fe) heavy metal content at different pH on the germination of seven soybean varieties in Indonesia. SAINS TANAH Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology, 20, 199-209. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/tanah/article/view/70802
  31. Yang, J., Mathew, I. E., Rhein, H., Barker, R., Guo, Q., Brunello, L., Loreti, E., Barkla, B. J., Gilroy, S., Perata, P., & Hirschi, K. D. (2022). The vacuolar H/Ca transporter CAX1 participates in submergence and anoxia stress responses. Plant Physiology, 190(4), 2617-2636. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac375
  32. Yuan, C., Liu, T., Li, F., Liu, C., Yu, H., Sun, W., & Huang, W. (2018). Microbial iron reduction as a method for immobilization of a low concentration of dissolved cadmium. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 747-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.14.023
  33. Yuan, C., Na, S., Li, F., & Hu, H. (2021). Impact of sulfate and iron oxide on bacterial community dynamics in paddy soil under alternate watering conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 408, 124417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12 4417