Global trends in health services and health equity for older adults: Insights from a Bibliometric Review
Michele A. Calda
Abstract:
As populations age, it is crucial to understand the research landscape
on health services and health equity for older adults to inform policy,
practice, and future research. The growing number of elderly individuals
has become a significant global public health issue, emphasizing the
need to examine how research on care delivery and equitable access
has evolved across various disciplines.
Bibliographic records related to health services and health equity
among older adults were sourced from the Scopus database. Data were
analyzed using VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix package to identify
thematic clusters, methodological patterns, and conceptual networks.
Co-occurrence analysis was used to map keyword relationships, and
thematic mapping was used to categorize the field's dominant,
emerging, and declining topics.
The co-occurrence network revealed a multidisciplinary structure
anchored by demographic descriptors (e.g., human, female, male), which
formed core hubs linked to thematic clusters in psychology, aging
epidemiology, prevention, socioeconomics, and global health. The
cumulative degree distribution indicated a scale-free architecture,
suggesting that a small set of high-frequency terms dominates
conceptual connections. Thematic mapping identified demographic
terminology as central, while topics such as prevalence, risk factors, and
mortality were classified as emerging or declining themes. Integrative
concepts from psychology, qualitative research, and interview-based
methods connected epidemiological and methodological perspectives,
reflecting a gradual shift toward mixed-methods inquiry.
This bibliometric review highlights a diverse research landscape that
draws on public health, psychology, epidemiology, and social sciences to
better understand health service delivery and equity among older adults.
Demographic descriptors serve as conceptual anchors, reinforcing a
core–periphery structure that supports both continuity and thematic
growth. The field is increasingly emphasizing social determinants of
health and experiential aspects of aging, with evidence of methodological
diversification. These insights could guide future interdisciplinary
collaborations, research priorities, and policies to promote equitable
health services for aging populations
References:
- Adebusoye, L. A., Cadmus, E. O., Labaeka, E. O., Ajayi, S. A., Olowookere, 0. 0., & Otegbayo, J. A. (2020). Caring for older adults during the COVID pandemic and beyond: Experience from a specialized tertiary facility for the care of older persons in a low-resource setting. The Pan African Medical Journal, 35(Suppl 2), 99. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.24521
- Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R package for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
- Bloom, D. E., & Luca, D. L. (2016). The global demography of aging: Facts, explanations, future (IZA Discussion Paper No. 10163). Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/10163
- Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011). The social determinants of health: Coming of age. Annual Review of Public Health, 32, 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218
- Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
- Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A’Court, C., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R., & Shaw, S. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775 Krieger, N. (2020). Measures of racism, sexism, heterosexism, and gender binarism for health equity research: From structural injustice to embodied harm-An ecosocial analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 41, 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094017
- Lloyd-Sherlock, P. G., Ebrahim, S., Geffen, L., & McKee, M. (2020). Bearing the brunt of COVID-19: Older people in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ, 368, m1052. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1052
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Medicine; Committee on the Future of Nursing 2020-2030, Flaubert, J. L., Le Menestrel, S., Williams, D. R., & Wakefield, M. K. (Eds.). (2021). The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equity. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25982
- Sadarangani, T. R., Gaugler, J. E., Dabelko-Schoeny, H., & Marx, K. A. (2022). Adult day services, health equity for older adults with complex needs, and the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 112(10), 1421-1428. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306968
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
- World Health Organization. (2022). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization. https://www.knowledge-action-portal.com/en/content/ageing-and-health
ISSN 2704-3541 (Online)
ISSN 0116-0710 (Print)