Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 46 no. 7 (2025)

The Language of Influence: Discourse Patterns in Maria Ressa’s Speeches

Mylene Villapaña | Evelyn Cañete

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the morpho-semantic and persuasive strategies employed in the speeches of Maria Ressa, a prominent journalist and advocate for press freedom. Through a qualitative approach, the study revealed the morphosemantic features and rhetorical techniques employed in Maria Ressa’s speeches, which frequently address critical themes such as democracy, human rights, and the fight against disinformation. Employing discourse analysis, the research provided valuable insights into the mechanisms of influence within political communication. A major finding of the study indicated that Maria Ressa's speeches utilized compounding, a language technique that combines words to form clear and impactful meanings. Furthermore, the analysis of her speeches reveals that she primarily employed logos, or logical reasoning, to persuade her audience. By sharing factual information, statistics, and personal experiences, she establishes her credibility and supports her advocacy. In conclusion, this research highlights the role of deliberate language choices in effective persuasion, demonstrating how impactful communication can foster civic awareness and inspire meaningful social change.



References:

  1. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health.
  2. Akanya, J., & Omachonu, C. G. (2019). Meaning and semantic roles of words in context. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 7(2), 1-9.
  3. Alejandro, A., & Zhao, L. (2023). Multi-Method Qualitative Text and Discourse Analysis: A Methodological Framework. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(6), 461-473.
  4. Al-Hindawi, F. H., & Hussien, N. D. (2023). Persuasive Strategies in Imam Al-Hassan’s (pbuh) Preaches. AL-AMEED JOURNAL, 12(1).    
  5. Alsoraihi, M. H. (2019). Bridging the Gap between Discourse Analysis and Language Classroom Practice. English Language Teaching, 12(8), 79-88.
  6. Aporbo, R., & Concepcion, K. M. (2024). Linguistic Features of Legal Discourse: Genre Analysis of Police Reports. Linguistic Features of Legal Discourse: Genre Analysis of Police Reports, 148(1), 16-16.
  7. Balla, A. A. S. (2023). Discourse Analysis of Female Political Speeches: A Study of Linguistic Techniques and Devices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(12), 3208-3216.   
  8. Balod, H. S. S., & Hameleers, M. (2021). Fighting for truth? The role perceptions of Filipino journalists in an era of mis-and disinformation. Journalism, 22(9), 2368-2385.          
  9. Banguis-Bantawig, R. (2019). The role of discourse markers in the speeches of selected Asian Presidents. Heliyon, 5 (3), e01298.
  10. Bartlett, R. C., & Behnegar, N. (Eds.). (2023). Political Rhetoric in Theory and Practice: A Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.           
  11. Betti, Mohammed Jasim & Igaab, Zainab Kadim. (2021). Semantics in Linguistics.
  12. Benlamine, M. S., Villata, S., Ghali, R., Frasson, C., Gandon, F., & Cabrio, E. (2017). Persuasive argumentation and emotions: An empirical evaluation with users. In Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 19 (pp. 659-671). Springer International Publishing.
  13. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Analyzing Linguistic Features and Their Functions. In Register, Genre, and Style (pp. 51–84). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.        
  14. Brown, B. (2021). Atlas of the heart: Mapping meaningful connection and the language of human experience. Random House.
  15. Duran, E. L. L. (2023). An analysis of linguistic features in the speeches of president duterte on controversial issues. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 28(3), 39-47.
  16. Charnchairerk, C. (2022). Key Defining Linguistic Features in the Writing Performance of First-Year University Students across Different Language Proficiency Levels. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 858-891.
  17. Derin, T., Nursafira, M. S., Yudar, R. S., Gowasa, N. S., & Hamuddin, B. (2020). Persuasive communication: What do existing literature tells us about persuasive communication among students?. Utamax: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 2(1), 12-18.
  18. De Pano, J. C. G. (2021). Source Credibility Dimensions in Philippine President Duterte’s State of the Nation Addresses. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21(1), 14.
  19. Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., & Cardie, C. (2020). The role of pragmatic and discourse context in determining argument impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03034.
  20. Giaxoglou, K. (2020). Discourse and the Linguistic Landscape. Cambridge University Press EBooks.
  21. Goodliffe, J., Magleby, D. B., & Scanlan, J. (2025). The Political Power of Negative Motivations. Political Behavior, 1-23.
  22. Guison, R., & Macalintal, A. (2023, June). When Cyber Libel Restrains Press Freedom: The Case of Maria Ressa. In MediAsia2023 Conference Proceedings.
  23. Guna, S., Lehon, I. N., Sapong, M., Sambora, A. R., & Kurnianto, Y. T. (2024). An analysis of inflectional and derivational affixes of the students’ academic writing.
  24. Gustafsson, M., Ganobcsik-Williams, L., Celebi, H., & Powers, J. C. (2024). Demystifying Written Academic Discourse Through Structured Support Approaches. Journal of Academic Writing, 14(2), ii-iii.     
  25. Harutyunyan, G., & Yeghiazaryan, A. (2021). Persuasion strategies in political discourse. Foreign Languages in Higher Education, 25(2 (31)), 14-29.
  26. Herman, T. (2022). Ethos and pragmatics. Languages, 7(3), 165.
  27. Igiri, O. T., Awa, J. O., Ogayi, M. C., & Ngwoke, R. I. (2020). Pronouns and metaphors in Obama’s and Trump’s inaugural speeches: A comparative analysis through critical discourse analysis. UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities, 21(2), 134-147.
  28. Ivana, P. S. I., & Suprayogi, S. (2020). The representation of Iran and United States in Donald Trump’s speech: A critical discourse analysis. Linguist. Lit. J, 1(2), 40-45.
  29. Jones, R. H. (2024). Discourse analysis: A resource book for students. Taylor & Francis.
  30. Kakar, Z. U. H., Rasheed, R., Rashid, A., & Akhter, S. (2023). Criteria for assessing and ensuring the trustworthiness in qualitative research.
  31. Kortmann, B. (2020). Semantics: Word and sentence meaning. English Linguistics: Essentials, 143–171.
  32. Legros, J. D., Tijus, C., & Pudelko, B. (2022, May). The effect of knowledge about topic on metaphorical meaning. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1238-1238). Routledge.
  33. Lazurkina, A., & Chebotareva, E. (2020). Persuasive Strategies in Public Speaking.
  34. Lin, M. (2024). Review of Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 47(3), 514-517.
  35. Lin, W. A. N. G. (2019). Three modes of rhetorical persuasion. Sino-US English Teaching, 16(3), 106-112.
  36. Mabini, D. A. (2023). Improving persuasive speaking skills using a student-developed template in an online learning environment. Journal of Language Teaching, 3(5), 12-22.
  37. Mantasiah, R. (2020). Semantic Feature Analysis Model: Linguistics Approach in Foreign Language Learning Material Development. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 185-196.  
  38. Manzoor, H., Saeed, S., & Panhwar, A. H. (2019). Use of discourse analysis in various disciplines. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 301-309.
  39. McEntire, J. L. Guided by Emotions: A Pedagogy of Pathos for Persuasive Writing. The Journal of Literature in Language Teaching, 38.
  40. Menzel, K. (2024, May). Exploring Word Formation Trends in Written, Spoken, Translated and Interpreted European Parliament Data–A Case Study on Initialisms in English and German. In Proceedings of the IV Workshop on Creating, Analysing, and Increasing Accessibility of Parliamentary Corpora (ParlaCLARIN)@ LREC-COLING 2024 (pp. 57-65).
  41. Mirza, H., Mirza, C., & Bellalem, F. (2023). Ethical considerations in qualitative research: Summary guidelines for novice social science researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(1), 441-449.
  42. Mel’čuk, I., & Milićević, J. (2020). Semantics in Language and Linguistics. In An Advanced Introduction to Semantics: A Meaning-Text Approach (pp. 3–29). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339914726_An_Advanced_Introduction_to_Semantics_A_Meaning-Text_Approach
  43. Mohamad, H. A. (2022). Analysis of rhetorical appeals to logos, ethos and pathos in ENL and ESL research abstracts. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(3), e001314-e001314.
  44. Monderin, C., & Go, M. B. (2021). Emerging netspeak word choices in social media on filipino pop culture. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4 (6), 49, 61.
  45. Myllylä, K. (2019). Ethos, Pathos and Logos; a Comparative Study of the Rhetorical Strategies Found in CEO Letters in English Annual Reports of Finnish Companies after Desirable and Undesirable Financial Years (Master Thesis). University of Turku, Finland.
  46. Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research.
  47. Ngene, A. R. (2019). The Significant Contribution of Morphology to the Study of English Language.
  48. Nugraha, D. S. (2022). MORPHOSEMANTIC FEATURES OF MEMBUAT’MAKE’IN THE LIGHT VERB CONSTRUCTIONS OF INDONESIAN. LiNGUA, 17(2).
  49. ORUNGBEJA, B., & AJILORE, K. (2022). National speeches on notable political figures: A position paper on CDA studies. ESI Preprints, 7, 168-168.
  50. Paltridge, B. (2021). Discourse analysis (pp. 41-44). Springer International Publishing.
  51. Park, H. H., Zhang, K. J., Haley, C., Steimel, K., Liu, H., & Schwartz, L. (2021). Morphology matters: A multilingual language modeling analysis. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9, 261-276.
  52. Pietilä, A. M., Nurmi, S. M., Halkoaho, A., & Kyngäs, H. (2020). Qualitative research: Ethical considerations. The application of content analysis in nursing science research, 49-69.
  53. Rana, K., Poudel, P., & Chimoriya, R. (2023, October). Qualitative methodology in translational health research: current practices and future directions. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 19, p. 2665). MDPI.     
  54. Ressa, M. (2022, January). Remarks by Maria Ressa. In Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting (Vol. 116, pp. 109-116). Cambridge University Press.
  55. Rivas, A. S., Mohamad, H. A., Lumabao, B. B., Sinsuat, D. R. R., Sinsuat, R. S., & Rivas, A. S. (2022). Vlogging among Filipino youth: a discourse analysis. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal.
  56. Rød, B., Pursiainen, C., & Eklund, N. (2025). Combatting Disinformation–How Do We Create Resilient Societies? Literature Review and Analytical Framework. European Journal for Security Research, 1-43.
  57. Samaraweera, S G S. (2025). The Influence of Morphological Awareness and Vocabulary Depth on Academic English Writing Skills of Undergraduates. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities.
  58. Sichach, M. (2024). Ethos, Pathos and Logos As Foundations of Persuasive Writing. Available at SSRN 4971293.
  59. Sinek, S. (2019). The infinite game. Penguin.
  60. Szabolcsi, A. (2024). Cross-linguistic insights in the theory of semantics and its interface with syntax / 2024. Theoretical Linguistics 50, ½, 125–133.
  61. Thomas, F. B. (2022). The role of purposive sampling technique as a tool for informal choices in a social Sciences in research methods. Just Agriculture, 2(5), 1-8.
  62. Ting, S. H. (2018). Ethos, Logos and Pathos in University Students’ Informal Requests. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(1).
  63. Ugwu, Chinyere & Eze, Val. (2023). Qualitative Research.
  64. Ulfah, R., & Hidayat, D. N. (2020). A Critical discourse analysis of parts of speech from TED-Talk video: How language shapes the way we think. Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching, 2(1), 49-60.
  65. Vella, J. (2024). In pursuit of credibility: Evaluating the divergence between member-checking and hermeneutic phenomenology. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.
  66. Vishnevetskaya, N. V., Solyanko, E. A., V Vishnevetskaya, N., & A Solyanko, E. (2020). Significance Of Various Types Of Discourse In Intercultural Communication Training. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 95.    
  67. Wallace, S. M., Mutiti, Y., & Chimerah, R. (2019). The Art Of Persuasion: Pathetic Appeal VIS-À-VIS Ethical And Logical Considerations. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(10).
  68. Xu, W., Ishikawa, Y., & Legaspi, R. (2022, March). The Utility of Personality Types for Personalizing Persuasion. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 240-254). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic